Iran to revise nuclear ties with U.N.
Iran's parliament voted to urge the government to re-examine its ties
with the U.N. nuclear agency following a Security Council decision to
impose sanctions against Tehran over its disputed nuclear program.

Deputy chief of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, Mohammad Saeedi,
center, attends an open session of parliament in Tehran, Iran,
Wednesday, Dec. 27, 2006. Iran's parliament voted Wednesday to urge
the government to "revise" ties with the U.N. nuclear agency but
stopped short of recommending a severing of relations. -AP |
The move Wednesday signalled that Iran was likely to reduce its
cooperation with the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency.
Iranian state radio predicted that once the bill came into effect,
"the agency will become an ineffective and weak body."
The vote came four days after the Security Council voted to impose
limited sanctions on Iran for its refusal to cease enrichment of uranium
- a process that produces the material for either nuclear reactors or
bombs. The United States and its European allies suspect Iran's civilian
nuclear program is a cover for developing a nuclear bomb. Iran says its
program is strictly for generating electricity.
The White House criticized the parliament decision, with U.S. Deputy
Press Secretary Scott Stanzel saying it would "worsen the situation in
the eyes of the world." "It's hard to see how such a downward spiral is
in the interest of the Iranian people. We hope, therefore, that the
Iranian regime will set aside threats and confrontation and immediately
cooperate with all the requirements of the Security Council," he said.
France said the vote was "not what we expected from Iran." French
Foreign Ministry spokesman Denis Simonneau said the U.N. resolution
requires Iran to cooperate fully with the IAEA.
The vote also came as Iran's foreign minister delivered a letter from
hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to Pope Benedict XVI at the
Vatican discussing the U.N. sanctions, Iran's state-run IRNA news agency
said. Details of the letter were not released, but the Vatican said the
pontiff stressed his apolitical role in his brief meeting with Foreign
Minister Manouchehr Mottaki.
National interests
The bill passed by parliament said the government was "obliged to
accelerate the country's peaceful nuclear program and revise its
cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency based on
national interests."
The bill was quickly approved by the Guardian Council, a
constitutional watchdog controlled by hard-line clerics, said deputy
speaker Mohammad Reza Bahonar. It will take effect 15 days after it is
signed Ahmadinejad, an ardent champion of Iran's nuclear program.
A special committee was formed to determine how to implement the law,
but it was unclear what steps Iran would take. Legislators and
newspapers have speculated that Tehran might restrict IAEA inspections
of its nuclear facilities, cutting the number of inspections and barring
inspectors from certain sites.
"Today, Iran's Supreme National Security Council formed a committee
to study aspects of the law and make decisions based on the situation,"
Ali Larijani, Iran's top nuclear negotiator, was quoted as saying by the
IRNA official news agency.
Members of Iran's ruling hierarchy had repeatedly urged the
government to cut ties with the IAEA if the Security Council imposed
sanctions.But Speaker Gholam Ali Haddad Adel said the bill would not
bind the government to a particular course of action.
"The bill gives a free hand to the government to decide on a range of
reactions - from leaving the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty to
remaining in the International Atomic Energy Agency and negotiating," he
said during the debate in parliament, which was broadcast live on state
radio.
He said 161 out of 203 legislators present voted in favour of the
bill, 15 voted against and 15 abstained.
The opponents and abstainers were reformists and moderate
conservatives. Some Iranian legislators had pushed for a bill that took
a more aggressive line against the IAEA, which they accused of being
dominated by the United States.
"The draft is not appropriate to the United States' animosity to
Iran," legislator Hassan Kamran said. "This is a weak draft. It should
be stronger." But other legislators said the bill should be thrown out.
Although the nuclear program is supported by all political factions
in Iran, opposition to the bill showed there are those who believe
authorities are pursuing a policy that is unnecessarily confrontational.
"There is no need for the bill. We should lessen tensions," said
legislator Noureddin Pirmoazzen.
BBC
|