'All UK must be on DNA database'-Justice Sedley
The whole population and every UK visitor should be added to the
national DNA database, a senior judge has said.
Lord Justice Sedley said the current database, which holds DNA from
crime suspects and scenes, was "indefensible" because it was unfair and
inconsistent.
He told BBC News an expanded database would also aid crime
prevention. Four million profiles are currently held.
Critics say those who commit certain offences should have their
details removed after a set period.
The DNA database - which is 12 years old - grows by 30,000 samples a
month taken from suspects or recovered from crime scenes. It is the
largest in the world.
The data of everyone arrested for a recordable offence - all but the
most minor offences - remains on the system regardless of their age, the
seriousness of their alleged offence, and whether or not they were
prosecuted.
It includes some 24,000 samples from young people between 10 and 17
years old, who were arrested but never convicted.
Sir Stephen Sedley, who is one of England's most experienced appeal
court judges, said: "Where we are at the moment is indefensible.
"We have a situation where if you happen to have been in the hands of
the police then your DNA is on permanent record. If you haven't, it
isn't... that's broadly the picture.
"It means that people who have been arrested but acquitted, some of
them because they are innocent, some of them because they are just
lucky, all stay on the database.
"It means where there is ethnic profiling going on disproportionate
numbers of ethnic minorities get onto the database. "It also means that
a great many people who are walking the streets and whose DNA would show
them guilty of crimes, go free."
He said reducing the database would be a mistake. He knew of cases
where a serious offender who had escaped conviction had ultimately been
brought to justice by DNA evidence that may have been otherwise
destroyed.
'Going forwards'
He said the only option was to expand the database to cover the whole
population and all those who visit the UK.
"Going forwards has very serious but manageable implications. It
means that everybody guilty or innocent should expect their DNA to be on
file for the absolutely rigorously restricted purpose of crime detection
and prevention."
But Professor Stephen Bain, a member of the national DNA database
strategy board, warned expansion would be expensive and make mistakes
more likely.
"The DNA genie can't be put back in the bottle," he said.
"If the information about you is exposed due to illegal or perhaps
even legalised use of the database, in a way that is not currently
anticipated, then it's a very difficult situation."
Tony Lake, chief constable of Lincolnshire Police and chairman of the
DNA board, said there needed to be a debate. "If people have been
convicted or have been arrested for offences which involve violent crime
or offences of a sexual nature, I think there is an argument [that DNA]
should stay on the database for life," he said.
"If we are talking about very minor offences... I don't think that
it's a problem to say let's have a means by which we would reassess if
we want to keep that DNA."
BBC |