Tracing the pattern of cricket’s mosaic
By Sharm DE ALWIS
CRICKET: It is with exquisite pleasure that I pick every
pattern that is of the fine mosaic of A. C. de Silva’s weekly recall of
the deeds of cricketers of yore. In truth theirs, certainly, was the
stuff of legends and how they performed with bat or ball would only be
confined to the receptacles of memories, never to be repeated on turf.
Our peers had told us glowingly of George Headly, the Black Bradman,
of Eddic Paynter, of Ranji who preferred to play for England rather than
for his own country because he felt by virtue of godles of wealth he was
primus interpares with the Brits, of Jack Hobbs and of Clem Hill and
Trumper, of Maurice Leyland and the versatile C. B. Fry who not content
with captaining England at cricket, turned his attention to rugger which
also he would have captained if not for a delayed arrival from a cricket
tour, athletics at the Olympics, football, diplomat, poet ad playwright
who wrote the delectable TIGER AT THE GATES, of Stan McCabe of whose
certain innings Bradman said he would have been happy to lay claim, Jack
Fingleton of whom it has been said that “the very blades of grass bowed
in obeisance as he arrived at the crease.
And on the other side of the 22 yard divide where immortal men hurled
the red cherry were Hedley Verity, Wilfred Rhodes, Syd Barnes, Maurice
Tait, Kenneth Farnes, prematurely killed in an air crash - they never
belonged to an age but to eternity.
As we came of age and came to grips with this noble game our heroes
were no lesser mortals - Lala Amaranath, Vijay Merchant, Vijay Hazare,
Vinoo Mankad, Majid Kham, Richard Hadlee, Basil D’Oliveira, Dennis
Lillee, Weekes, Worrell and Walcott the three names to be spoken of in
the same breath, of Rohan Kanhai of the pulsating strokes of beauty, of
Peter May, Ted Dexter and Colin Cowdrey of bulky frame but mighty deeds.
Alright, they may have been slightly lesser gods but we deified them and
in every corner of our collective soul we had altars erected for fervent
worship.
Who will not make me perish if I were to forget Cyril Washbrooke or
David Shepherd returning to the crease in answer to a desperate prayer
of the selectors to bring dignity back to England’s batting and they
both spread honour and valour as they scored near centuries, each of
them.
Denis Compton - golden boy
The Golden Boy of cricket in the period was Denis Compton who at 17
years of age dared and ousted yet another Middlesex immortal in Patsy
Hendren. If Keith Miller was the Byron in flannels, of Compton it has
been said that “his genius was romantic and individual,” Miller and
Compton were peripheral twins but oceans apart.
There was for us Ales Bedser who got better like fine wine as he
trundled along from 1950 to share a massive haul of wickets. What about
the wily spin and fluent batsmanship of Richie Benaud and his astute
captaincy? Are we then to forget Frank Tyson who struck the fear of
Moses into the hearts of Australian batsmen and who was shrieked at by
Gabba “take a taxi!” because of his extra-ordinary run up to the crease?
The mercurial Neil Harvey stormed the bastion as an 18 year old
prodigy and rubbed shoulders with the giants in the team, Bradman,
Miller, Barnes and Morris. And he kept his promises for many years.
There was another child prodigy in Brian Close, stout-hearted like a
modern day King Arthur.
There was the checky bravura of Sid Barnes who faced the first ball
of England’s tear-away with a miniature bat which he had carried in his
hip pocket. He would shield from Bedser his bunny. Arthur Morris until
Morris found his rhythm on his way to yet another century.
There was Stonewall Trevor Bailey of whom Miller complained that when
he died and his heart was opened, TREVOR BAILEY would be etched firmly
on it. Sotdgy Mackay was termed in a twist of Slasher Mackay.
Sobers 4-in-1 cricket
Garfield Sobers had a feline stride even as he crossed between
wickets at the end of an over as though there were springs in his heels.
Sobers began his stupendous career as a 17 year old in 1957 against
England and I saw him score 17 and 66 in the Lords’ Test and 39 and 42
in the Oval Test both of which England won by innings. He has been
considered the 4-in-1 cricketer for his medium pace, spin, batting and
electric fielding.
The elegance of Tom Gravency was not for Hutton whose batsmanship, it
has been said, was like him, Yorkshire born and bred and he would score
a ‘walking hundred’ which were of essence only to the purists. The
thrift followed him from the crease to the bar-room whereof he once
admitted.
I have bought a drink but not too often.” It has also been said that
his batsmanship was solitary and inspired admiration rather than love
which was the divine right of Compton and Edrich, of Graveney and
D’Oliveria who often batted ‘just for fun’. But then Hutton had the
marauding, Lindwall and Miller to contend with and so remained a goose
who never became the swan. He was, like Scrooge, an accumulator.
These were men with the gift of skill and they oozed charisma and
spectators thronged. Neville Cardus, Alan Rose, Johnny Moyes and John
Arlott wrote in italics when they described the scenes of glory.
Invariably 360 runs were scored within a day’s play.
There is none to fill the boots left in the dressing rooms by these
gallant warriors and that is precisely the reason for the lack of
interest in Test cricket. No one fires the imagination like a Brian Lara
or a Viy Richards.
Inversely, Limited Overs cricket is having a field day. It commenced
internationally in January of 1971 and at the close of the first thirty
years 1,739 ODIs were played as against 1,551 Tests since 1877. |