Doublespeak of the West
Gomin Dayasri
Doublespeak is a double barrel name for Western Foreign Policy. Lets
examine the varying stands shown to the LTTE and the Talibans-Sri Lankan
and Pakistan civilians by the West.
Hillary Clinton says (in a bout of doublespeak?) she “deeply regrets
Afghan casualties” in the Afghanistan theatre of war due to overhead
bombing by US fighter planes.
Pakistan has declared war on the Taliban militants at the bequest of
America. The fighting on the edge of Swat Valley has led to the inflow
of nearly 500,000 refugees from the war zone.
It is a war designed by United States with active participation and
heavy funding against ethnic Pashtun tribesmen in the North West
frontier carried out by Pakistan on the instructions of White House.
These are the tribes that sheltered Osama bin Laden and the Talibans
after the attack on the Twin Towers which led to the invasion of
Afghanistan.
CIA funding
It was America that assembled the Talibans as an effective fighting
formation to be their proxies in their war against the occupying Soviet
forces, with CIA funding. The madrasas (Islamic schools) in Pakistan
which is alleged to breed terrorism in the Islamic world was created by
funding originating from US, Britain and Saudi Arabian sources.
To the United States, the terrorists in Pakistan and Afghanistan on
the borders of the North West frontier must be mowed down by helicopter
gun ships and heavy armour. Otherwise it is detrimental to Western
interest.
Taliban must be eliminated comprehensively, is the Western military
anthem.
Yet Miliband or Kouchner have not opted to visit the devastated
regions in Pakistan and make a humanitarian plea to save the civilians
trapped in a war zone where heavy weaponry and air strikes are the order
of the day. They have not made an appeal on behalf of the civilians who
cannot flee due to a round the clock curfew. The West is not seeking
Pakistani military assistance to save the civilians from a war
situation. They show no concern for civilians unlike in Sri Lanka.
The Pakistanis or the Afghans do not have a vocal Diaspora with a
vote catching machine to deliver voters in the West on polling day.No
Western Power is seeking an amnesty for the Islamic militants.
Instead there is rendition to torture camps to elicit confessions. It
is conducted on foreign soil to escape from the due process of the law
under American territorial jurisprudence.
No calls for ceasefires
There are no calls of ceasefires from America instead the Prime
Minister of Pakistan and the President of Afghanistan are summoned to
Washington and demanded the war be intensified to wipe the Talibans from
the face of the Earth.
The West is calling on Sri Lanka to enable the LTTE to surrender to
an international third party. In Afghanistan more Western fighting
forces are inducted to fight the Talibans-there is no call for a pause
for negotiations or opportunity to surrender to a friendly force.
The Nordic countries are not sending emissaries to talk peace.
Instead efforts are being made to enlarge the fighting contingent and
arming them with modern sophisticated weaponry.Are we stupid as the West
to create Madrasas and Talibans and bin Ladens as surrogates and then be
the target of attack and undergo a metamorphosis after 9/11 and then
declare war? Is it smart foreign policy that in the American backyard
the bulk of the Latin American nations are electing by popular vote
administrations hostile to the US? Did not America have to bail out of
Vietnam and Laos?
In the humanitarian lexicon is there a difference between Sri Lankan
refugees from Wanni and the Pakistan refugees from the SWAT Valley? They
are civilians by status and the West sadly is not sending emissaries to
speak on their plight.
Why not a call for a ceasefire for those innocent civilians in the
SWAT Valley on whom the West has turned a blind eye and are instead
firing to kill? Indeed Hillary Clinton admits US helicopter gun ships
had targeted innocent civilians. How many children and women died in
these attacks? In fact America is persuading the Pakistanis and the
Afghans to intensify the attacks.
Has the west forgotten we are providing food and medical facilities
to the civilians including the terrorists for the last 25 years during
the entire course of the War? Has the West carried on a war while
supplying provisions free to the enemy? The bottom line is what is good
for America is not what is best for Sri Lanka.
Interfering West do not have our interest in their agenda. We have to
steer our ship to suit our voyage.
The West will sail with the flag of skull and bones to navigate any
country to dangerous waters to extract the best for themselves. We must
be circumspect to work on the lines of our priorities.
National Interest of two countries can never be the same.
Courtesy: defence.lk
|