Four strategies vital :
Protecting the wetlands
by Patali CHAMPIKA RANAWAKA
In 2007, in my capacity as the Minister of Environment & Natural
Resources, I had to attend a function as its chief guest, to mark the
launching of the National Wetland Directory of
Sri Lanka. At this
meeting, the well known Environmentalist, Dr. Sarath Kotagama pointed
out that our wetlands were rapidly shrinking due to human activities.
Prior to that observation, it was my perception that the main cause for
shrinking of wetlands had been due to deliberate filling and reclamation
activities carried out by people and institutions. However, Dr.
Kotagama’s observation at the meeting, convinced me to accept the fact
that soil erosion contributes much towards the natural shrinking of our
wetlands. Every time I visited cities and suburbs, I could see many
wetlands - both natural wetlands and abandoned paddy fields, being used
as waste dumping yards by individuals, institutions and some local
authorities as well. Those who are with vested interests, deliberately
dump garbage into wetlands and carryout earth filling on top.
They subsequently block out these filled land and put it up for sale.
Some valuable buildings like Hilton Hotel, Nawam Mawatha Buildings,
Maligawatta Housing Complex in Colombo have been built on (filled-up)
wetlands. Even the Blomendhal garbage mountain once had been an
abandoned paddy field and a marshy wetland. The dumping of Colombo
Municipal Council garbage at Blomendhal commenced in 1991, and the
motive behind that exercise would have been to make that wetland
saleable at a latter date. So, filling wetlands with garbage and its
subsequent selling have been a lucrative business in Colombo and
suburbs.
Sometime back, when I made a field visit to Bellanwila - Attidiya
sanctuary to ascertain the new eco system development on a waste dump,
the land owners of the sanctuary made representations and requested that
they be allowed to fill their respective blocks to make them saleable.
This area recorded in epics, written during the Kotte period, was a vast
paddy field prior to and in the 1970s. However, due to various reasons
these fields were abandoned and as a result, invasive plants like ‘Wel
Aththa’ had found their way in to them and it started spreading like a
cancer. Unfortunately, these valuable water retention areas and the bird
sanctuaries are now gradually vanishing.
The wetlands are kidneys of eco systems. Environmental services
provided by the wetlands are very important for the eco systems to
survive. When it rains, wetlands act as water retention and filtration
areas, raising the water table facilitating the people to tap fresh
water. Variety of flora and fauna thrive in wetlands and therefore, they
play a very important role in preserving biodiversity.
They also maintain food chains and these vast areas with vegetation,
naturally purify the air by absorbing carbon and releasing oxygen. On
the other hand they act as essential eco corridors for unsustainable
cities that are coming up rapidly. So it is very important to have
wetlands as open spaces and eco corridors as sustainable for eco cities,
which need to be built in the future. Unfortunately, as the services
rendered by wetlands to maintain the equilibrium of the eco system has
not been properly identified, their market values are comparatively low.
In order to get its market value enhanced, its owners opt to fill it for
monitory gains. It is profitable for various institutions including
local authorities to purchase low priced wetlands, reclaim and construct
buildings or other infrastructure facilities on them. Having set up the
Low Lying Areas Reclamation Board - a new arm of the then government,
the former President Premadasa pioneered the process of filling and
selling lowlands.
Unfortunately, he was so vociferous and took much pride in announcing
that he was converting abandoned marshy land to mini cities like
Maligawatta Flats and Nawam Mawatha Buildings, without realizing the
fact that his exercise would lead to adverse imminent environmental
problems. However, within a short period of time, the repercussions of
that ill-advised exercise was experienced by its proponents and many
others when several areas of Colombo and suburbs got inundated by
floods.
It is important to note that present day cities are totally
unsustainable.
Without fossil fuels we are unable to maintain sky scrapers, flyovers
and fuel guzzling transportation etc., It is reported that the first
commercial oil well was found by one DRAKE in 1859 and it is predicted
that the last drop of oil in the last well will be exhausted by 2059. We
are presently experiencing the much awaited oil peak, and if we look far
ahead for the sake of our grand children, we have to look for ways and
means of introducing new energies to sustain built environments. On the
other hand burning of some fossil fuels cause heat pollution. Green
House Gases with carbon cause solar radiation accumulation and it
results in the rising of global mean temperature. Global warming and
climate change would seriously threaten the mere existence of humanity.
So, the depletion of oil resources and its destructive pollution effects
would force us to choose a new paradigm or trajectory for sustainable
development.
In order to achieve sustainable development, a new concept called
Green Economy has been introduced. Green Economy is based on renewable
energies and the built environment should essentially be Eco friendly
and self sustainable. Generally Sri Lanka’s priority for development is
to enhance its infrastructure facilities like road network, electricity
and transportation etc. The IMF, the World Bank and the other lending
agencies and partners of development aid should focus on this as their
top priority.
But as per green economic policies, a new concept called Green
Infrastructure has emerged. Multi faceted global crisis promoted this
green new big deal and development of green infrastructure. One of its
main themes is conservation and the restoration of low lands and
wetlands.
As mentioned earlier, the market based value system has failed to add
the desired values to the ecosystem services rendered by wetlands or
other similar systems. Therefore, the government or the public sector
should intervene and introduce new schemes to protect and enhance value
of the eco system services. Generally there are four accepted strategies
for protection and enhancement of eco services.
(i) Direct intervention by the government by way of direct funding on
restoration projects.
(ii) Introducing a fee or a tax on people or institutions which cause
damage to ecosystem services. This restoration levy will compensate the
damage done.
(iii) By subsidizing the private parties for the steps they take to
conserve and enhance the ecosystem services. For example the government
can pay the land owners to improve their private property which act as
water retention or watershed areas.
(iv) Creating new markets by way of introducing trading systems. This
is a widely accepted mechanism which provide a price on Ecosystem
services.
Governments do this by allocating trading permits or property rights
in ecosystem services and then allow other parties to purchase these
permits or rights.
To get the best out of this trading system which could be applied to
enhance the value of wetlands, we have to study its practical
implementation. In 1995 the city of Eugine in Oregon, USA, established
the wetland trading permit system to protect cities of wetlands. They
knew very well that their wetlands provided valuable ecosystem services
such as water filteration, flood control and species habitat.
A new law was introduced so that any private developer who wanted to
build on existing wetland, had to agree to mitigate the impact by
creating or protecting other wetlands. That means a developer who wanted
to build on a wetland had to meet that requirement either by creating
new wetlands or purchasing a wetland trading permit process by someone
else.
The city of Eugine also established a Wetland Mitigation Bank. This
Bank had a dual purpose where those who owned wetlands could store or
deposit their certified wetland credit in that Bank and those who wanted
to mitigate the damage caused by their building on wetlands could
purchase those credits. That could produce new value to the wetland
owners. On the other hand new green businesses enhancing green
infrastructure by way of creating new wetlands could promote
entrepreneurs and also it would discourage developers to build on
wetlands in order to keep their mitigation cost low.
These four strategies should be introduced to protect wetlands in Sri
Lanka as well. It is fortunate that The Sri Lanka Land Reclamation &
Development Corporation (LRDC) has now launched new projects with these
objectives in mind. Presently our Ministry of Environment and Natural
Resources is in collaboration with The LRDC to explore the feasibility
of implementing these strategies in Kelaniya, Mudunella wetlands, while
preserving the flood control and water filteration capability of new
developed land for the waste management systems of the area.
The market values of Muthurajawela, Aththidiya and various other
lowlands could also be enhanced if we apply these new strategies. The
public should be made aware of these strategies before unnecessary
politically motivated petty protest campaigns are staged jeopardizing
these valuable projects and proposals even before they are put into
operation.
The writer is the Minister of Environment and Natural Resources
|