End of global LTTE network imminent - Prof. Rohan Gunaratna
by Manjula FERNANDO
In an exclusive interview with
the `Sunday Observer’, Prof. Rohan Gunaratna, Head,
International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism
Research in Singapore focuses on efforts to dismantle the LTTE’s
international network and argues the case for reaching out to
LTTE leaders and cadres living overseas to obtain their support
for rebuilding the Nation. An author of several books on Sri
Lanka he is constantly sought after by foreign States during
investigations for his expert knowledge on LTTE international
affairs. When the LTTE ship “MV Princess Easwary”/”MV Ocean
Lady” was detained in Vancouver in October 2009, Professor
Gunaratna was appointed by the Government of Canada to provide
advice on the origins of the ship.
|
Q: The Government today announced the seizing of three ships owned
and operated by the LTTE leader Tharmalingam Shanmugam Kumaran alias
Kumaran Pathmanathan (KP) who is now in State custody. What is the
background to this development?
A: The Secretary of Defence Gotabhaya Rajapaksa understood that even
if the LTTE is defeated in Sri Lanka, peace is not sustainable unless
Sri Lanka dismantles the LTTE infrastructure overseas. Sri Lanka faces a
risk of terrorism every day as long as the LTTE infrastructure is intact
and the LTTE remains active outside Sri Lanka. As such, the Sri Lankan
government worked with their foreign counterparts building platforms to
monitor, detect and disrupt LTTE cells overseas that posed a threat to
national security.
Even before Prabhakaran was killed, working with a small team of
specialists, the Defence Secretary masterminded the operation to bring
home KP, the designated successor to Prabhakaran. Since then, the Sri
Lankan government has adopted a pragmatic approach of working with both
KP and former LTTE leaders to abandon the LTTE’s violent ideology and
build long- term peace.
Q: Were the LTTE ships seized and crew detained?
A: The LTTE ships were not seized. They were handed over after an
intensive dialogue between the Sri Lankan Government and former LTTE
leaders living overseas who see the futility of continuing the war. It
was a voluntary act by former LTTE leaders who are pragmatic and do not
want a return to violence. They want to contribute to the national
development of Sri Lanka, build the broken bridges between the Tamils
and the Sinhalese, and contribute to peace and stability. It is
paramount for Sri Lanka to treat them with due care and give them a role
in developing the North and the East that has suffered most.
Q: What was the use of the ships to the LTTE ? Did the tasks change
after its battleground defeat? Reports said the LTTE ships formerly used
for gun running were later used to smuggle out LTTE cadres?
A: The human smuggling activity is led by Kanagarajah Ravishankar,
the head of the LTTE shipping network. A long time member of the LTTE,
Ravishankar organized Princess Easwary (masquerading as MV Ocean Lady)
that transported 76 LTTE members and others to Canada in October 2009. A
recently naturalized Canadian citizen of Sri Lankan origin, Ravishankar
studied navigation in Canada in 2003. The ships under Ravishankar’s
control were responsible for receiving the weapons from North Korea and
other supplies off Sri Lanka and discharging them to LTTE fast craft.
There are a few such LTTE leaders who are interested in criminality.
Some are driven only by personal profit and others by both personal gain
and perpetuating the fight. Even the LTTE political leaders overseas
find it hard to control them. With the LTTE military defeat in Sri Lanka
in May 2009, the LTTE lost central control of its international network.
Even KP who was appointed as the successor to Prabhakaran could not
control the entire LTTE international network. Today there is a segment
of criminally oriented LTTE leaders overseas engaged in human smuggling,
financial fraud (credit card, bank and cheque fraud) and a range of
other illegal activities.
Q: KP said to have owned five vessels including the ships on their
way to Sri Lanka, where are the other two? What has happened to the
Agents of the seized craft? This is deemed as the second biggest blow to
the terrorist outfit since the dismantling of its military wing and
decimation of its leadership in May? How was this major feat
accomplished?
A: For a period KP was sidelined in 2003 and LTTE shipping and
procurement was given to Ponniah Anandarajah alias Aiiyah. Evading
arrest in Asia, Ponniah Anandarajah is a US citizen and a double
accountant and a former student of KP. Ponniah Anandarajah mostly
purchased ships out of Japan and used the ships to bring weapons from
North Korea to the equator where the goods were transferred in small
ships and subsequently small fast boats.
When KP was reappointed by Prabhakaran in early 2009, KP could not
take control of the entire fleet. By that time Prabhakaran had
decentralized LTTE activities overseas and KP had limited authority.
That is why when KP was captured in Malaysia in August 2009, the entire
LTTE fleet was not under KP’s control. Today, Sri Lanka has developed a
dual approach: one of hunting LTTE leaders unwilling to abandon violence
and second of engaging and working with LTTE leaders willing to
cooperate. With this initial victory, it is important for Sri Lanka to
adopt a position of offering an amnesty to anyone in the LTTE willing to
abandon violence and engage in developing Sri Lanka especially the war
affected North and the East. After a careful and a detailed study of the
LTTE, I had proposed to the government that for those who abandon
violence, Sri Lanka should grant an amnesty, assure immunity from
prosecution, and facilitate their active participation in the
development of Sri Lanka. Such a move will demonstrate that government
and the Sri Lankan President is genuine about winning the peace. Such an
incentive is paramount to encourage others who are on the fence and
sidelines to join the mainstream.
Q: How did the LTTE come to own such a large shipping fleet? What was
their strength at its peak? What can we do to dismantle the fleet
entirely?
A: The blue water shipping fleet was much bigger than the Sri Lankan
national security community anticipated, Since the LTTE purchased its
first ship Cholan in 1984, the LTTE procured over 50 ships and managed a
fleet of two dozen ships at any given time. While most of the time these
ships transported general cargo, on occasion they were used to move
arms, ammunition, explosives and other dual user technologies to the
LTTE. While the Sri Lankan navy has periodically destroyed LTTE ships in
the lead up to final phase of the campaign, the other vessels both cargo
ships and trawlers have come under the scrutiny of the international
intelligence community.
The owners and managers of these ships are under pressure from the
international security and intelligence agencies. Although they are
registered perfectly and operated according to rules and regulations,
governments overseas now know the identities and the front companies of
those who manage the LTTE ships. In such an environment, the Sri Lankan
government should engage them. Secretary Defence Gotabhaya Rajapaksa has
now created a path even for those who advocated, supported and
participated in LTTE activities to abandon that road and usher in an era
of national development. In moving towards genuine disengagement from
violence, this informal process of mainstreaming those in the margins
should be strengthened by legalizing it.
Q: Can the Sri Lankan Government seek legal redress from the
countries the ships have been registered?
A: Yes, Sri Lanka should embark on a robust process to litigate
against countries, institutions and individuals that knowingly supported
terrorism.
The first step is to bring a law that makes this possible and makes
it mandatory. This will deter those who support, advocate and
participate in violence, even from a distance, liable.
There are such laws in the US and recently even other countries have
adopted this practice.
Counter terrorism litigation is a very powerful instrument and it
must be used by governments worldwide to create a counter terrorist
environment.
Well versed on terrorism, the Sri Lankan Attorney General’s
department under its very able Attorney General Mohan Peiris should look
into the feasibility of adopting this powerful tool to fight terrorism.
Q: As far as Sri Lanka was concerned who were our biggest allies in
dismantling the LTTE shipping network?
A: The Sri Lankan Navy dismantled the LTTE shipping network but with
precise intelligence from the Sri Lankan military and initial leads from
the U.S., and the Australian governments. To a limited extent, India and
mostly the Indian navy helped.
Although some segments of these countries were lobbied by the LTTE,
especially in the lead up to the final phase, Sri Lanka must not forget
them. Many countries are working together with the Sri Lankan Government
to monitor the remaining LTTE ships, their companies and individuals
behind them. It is a question of time that the Sri Lankan government
working with their counterparts will dismantle the entire network.
Q: Minister Keheliya Rambukwella said KP’s interrogation revealed the
presence of 600 unidentified bank accounts. Have you any idea what is
the total value of these accounts? Where are these accounts
concentrated?
A: Most of the LTTE funds were collected in Canada, Europe, and
Australia but were transferred through accounts in East Asia for
procuring weapons from North Korea. Several million dollars worth of
weapons were procured every year. The financial information has helped
to track the donors upstream and the operational cells and activists
downstream.
Under the guise of negotiating peace, the LTTE duped several NGOs and
Western governments.
A very cunning organization, the LTTE used the goodwill of the West
to build a vast infrastructure that enabled and facilitated a campaign
of terror and violence in Sri Lanka. The LTTE raised more money during
the peace process than when fighting. The LTTE procured and transported
more weapons during the peace process than when fighting.
When the LTTE knew that militarily they had limitations, the LTTE
diverted a proportion of funds to fund the campaigns of US and other
politicians. The LTTE also created a special budget for human rights
work - that is the LTTE used its activists to lobby Human Rights Watch,
Amnesty International and UN organs! That is how LTTE propaganda and
data ended up in US and EU and other reports.
Q: Was KP the only individual who had access to LTTE funds ? If not
who are the other custodians?
A: No, KP hardly handled LTTE money after 2003. There are many others
and many of them are worried for their past deeds. The chief
international accountant of the LTTE still lives in Europe. The chief
LTTE international procurement officer lives in Asia. The chief LTTE
shipping officer lives in North America. Many of them will be placed in
Interpol red notices in the coming months. Sri Lanka needs to do a lot
more work in collaboration with foreign governments to dismantle the
LTTE network.
Q: How strong are the fund raising activities of the LTTE now?
A: LTTE fundraising has diminished. Many Tamils who took loans on
interest from banks and contributed to the LTTE are now asking the LTTE
fund collectors to return their monies. They want to send their children
to school, care for their parents, help brothers and sisters in Sri
Lanka, and save some funds for their retirement. They curse the LTTE
fund collectors living in multi-story homes with three garages.
Nediyawan in Norway wants the fund raising to continue. Nediyawan
believes that if he adopts the political track of Rudrakumaran, Tamils
will not give him money. So, Nediyawan is still peddling the Tamil Eelam
story and re-living Prabhakaran! On November 26-27, 2009, Nediyawan’s
network from Canada to London, France to Germany, Switzerland to
Scandinavia and from Australia to New Zealand raised funds.
Sri Lanka should strengthen the Financial Intelligence Unit of the
Central Bank to work with their counterparts to track the funds. Counter
terrorist financial investigations are a very powerful tool in the fight
against terrorism. Investigations so far have revealed that the LTTE
hired lawyers, retired diplomats, PR companies and journalists including
in the US, UK, Australia, Canada, and in other countries. The LTTE of
the future will continue to do this until its superstructure is
dismantled and its activists and fronts are prosecuted.
Until the LTTE superstructure overseas is dismantled, LTTE will
survive both as an ideology and an operational group overseas. The
investigative and intelligence agencies of the Sri Lankan government
that had an inward focus should now focus overseas - the threat to Sri
Lanka is coming from overseas.
Entrepreneurs
Q: What has happened to LTTE International since LTTE Domestic was
defeated in May 2009? What is the thinking and strategy of the
government on defeating LTTE International?
A: With Prabhakaran’s death and KP returning home, the LTTE
International split. The LTTE Intellectual Faction led by Rudrakumaran
in the US and the LTTE Criminal Faction led by Nediyawan in Norway
developed serious differences.
While the end goals of both these factions are to create a separate
state, Nediyawan driven by financial motives is still projecting
Prabhakaran’s image, the Tiger flag and an armed struggle.
Although Nediyawan wants a return to violence, most Tamils are tired
of fighting and see through the risk of joining these politically and
economically motivated reckless ethnic entrepreneurs. Today, at least
half of the LTTE leaders and activists overseas want to return to their
home country and prevent another round of violence.
The Government of Sri Lanka approached and succeeded in convincing
key LTTE leaders to participate in the social and economic development
of the North and the East.
Instead of being trapped by the vicious ideology of the LTTE, some of
these pragmatic Tamil leaders have decided to hand over the LTTE assets,
including the ships, under their control. They do not see a point in
contributing to another cycle of violence. Without any delay, Sri Lankan
Government should give them an amnesty, assure immunity from
prosecution, and facilitate their active participation in the
development of Sri Lanka.
It is a bold political step essential to bring long-term stability
and peace to Sri Lanka.
Q: Will some Sri Lankans fail to understand and disrupt this process
of reaching out to segments of the Tamil community from abandoning Eelam
and joining the economic and political mainstream?
A: Emerging from three decades of cruel violence, most Sri Lankans
will be suspicious of former LTTE leaders who genuinely want to abandon
their violent past. Some Sri Lankans will not understand why a
Government that has militarily defeated the LTTE must take such a bold
step of extending the olive branch.
We cannot continue to fight everyday. An eye for an eye will make the
whole country blind. Without being trapped by Prabhakaran’s legacy of
hatred, Sri Lanka should take a risk of working with every segment of
society.
Unless Sri Lanka embraces those sons and daughters of Sri Lanka who
want to enter the mainstream, we will always have an extreme, Unless Sri
Lanka engages, works and facilitates their return home to rebuild the
country that has suffered, the LTTE will co-opt them.
With this initial gain, every Sri Lankan must work hard to reach out
to other communities. Without being trapped by the narrow ethnic
nationalism in them, they must develop a Sri Lankan mindset.
If Sinhalese only speak for the interests of the Sinhalese and if
Muslims only speak for the interests of the Muslims and if Tamils only
speak for the interests of Tamils, there will be no Sri Lanka, let alone
a united Sri Lanka.
There should be an unwritten code of conduct that politicians should
not speak for their community alone but for the entire country. Unity of
the Sri Lankan nation should not be taken for granted. In no country
will unity come naturally. |