Addressing the dengue crisis
Mosquito-borne
diseases have always been prevalent in Sri Lanka, but the ongoing battle
with dengue is perhaps the most serious challenge faced by Sri Lanka's
health system. Worldwide too, dengue infects at least 50 million people
every year - second only to malaria. In Sri Lanka, however, malaria has
taken a backseat to dengue in recent times.
Nearly 160 people have succumbed to the mosquito-borne disease this
year while 21,677 cases have been reported so far. A surge has been
observed this month with 20 deaths reported in the first three weeks.
Children seem to be especially vulnerable.
These are alarming numbers by any standard and urgent action is
required at national level to prevent more deaths. The Government has
declared a Dengue Prevention Week in August to widen awareness on the
disease and to step up prevention efforts. It is our belief that every
day should be a 'dengue prevention day'.
The authorities must also resolve the BTI (Bacillus thuringiensis
israelensis) bacteria issue without delay so that prevention efforts
could move into a higher gear. The aerial spraying of BTI has been a
success in countries such as Cuba, which has been cited as a source for
importing BTI. Such biological control has the potential to be a
long-term viable solution, with none of the environmental problems
associated with chemical (spray) control.
In this country, there is a tendency to blame the authorities for
everything that goes wrong. The dengue epidemic is no exception to this
norm. There have been many calls for the resignation of those at the
helm of the health service on the dengue issue. Yes, there are areas
where the authorities could and should have fared better, but their
stepping down would not necessarily solve the dengue problem. The wider
society should turn the searchlight inwards to probe the very roots of
this serious problem.
The dengue epidemic has exposed a lot of shortcomings in a variety of
sectors. But at least part of the blame should go to local bodies and
householders who do not clean up. The truth is that we have neglected
the upkeep of our surroundings, at a personal level. Mosquitoes are
allowed to breed in every nook and corner, giving rise not only to
dengue but malaria and filaria as well. It is clear that neglect on the
part of certain provincial and local authorities to clear garbage dumps
and mosquito breeding sites has also contributed to this status quo. The
Local Government authorities should get their act together if they are
honestly committed to eradicate dengue and other such diseases.
Individual residents and owners of business premises too must be held
responsible. Many householders have neglected cleaning their compounds,
which have turned into ideal breeding sites for disease carrying
mosquitoes. Public cooperation is essential to minimise, if not
eliminate, mosquito-borne diseases. The regular cleaning of household
compounds and throwing away water accumulating in bottles, pots and used
tyres are just two of the steps that can be taken without almost any
cost to minimise the risk of dengue. The dengue vector mosquito has an
affinity for clear water and daylight hours. Taking protective measures
only at night will be of little help.
The public should be vigilant. Those who experience fever even for a
day or two should undergo blood tests for dengue at the nearest public
or private hospital, though it is advisable to seek treatment at a
public hospital. It should be borne in mind that if detected in the
early stages, dengue can be cured easily. Any delay in seeking
medication could thus prove to be fatal. Children are especially
vulnerable and it is up to parents to rush their children having fever
to the nearest medical facility. It is better to be safe, rather than
sorry. The health authorities must provide all necessary facilities for
the hospitals to address the heavy influx of dengue cases. An
extraordinary crisis deserves an extraordinary response, after all.
Is there any other hope on the horizon ? Yes, a dengue vaccine is on
the way. But production is not due to begin at least until 2013, after
extensive clinical trials which are now under way. But widespread use
may be many more years away. Our universities and research institutes
too must be involved in vaccine research in collaboration with the World
Health Organisation (WHO). The Third World must initiate collective
vaccine research programs, as some vaccines manufactured by
multinational drug companies are very expensive.
We have seen reports of another development. We may one day spend
less time swatting mosquitoes if researchers succeed in their efforts to
produce a repellent that works longer, with less odour, than most of
today's sprays and lotions. Scientists produced 23 new compounds after
teaching a computer to recognise which chemicals would do the best job
of warding off mosquitoes. Ten of the compounds gave almost 40 days'
protection, more than twice the amount from DEET, the most common
product in repellents. In other words, the new repellants will give 24
hours protection if worn on garments as opposed to the 12 hours possible
with today's best ones. More regional and local companies must be
involved in efforts of this nature. In fact, a Sri Lankan company now
produces a treated mosquito net.
In the meantime, nothing works better than tried and tested
preventive measures such as clearing garbage, stagnant water, blocked
water etc. These cost little or no money and often a Shramadana effort
can show positive results. Stern action must be taken against local
authorities and householders who do not clean their environs. The media
must play a pro-active role in educating the public on the benefits of
such steps. Public cooperation and participation will be vital in
eradicating dengue and other such diseases. If the public is not keen on
keeping disease at bay, we cannot expect the authorities alone to do it
for us. It should be a collective effort of the authorities and the
public. |