Post-coloniality and Cultural Difference
In this week's column I wish to further examine the post-coloniality
and Cultural Difference. Previously, I wrote that the scope of
'post-colonial' and 'post-coloniality' have been widened up to include
not only the narrative, representational and political strategies of
newly independent Asian/African nations but also modes of negotiations
adapted by African Americans /Asian American and Asian British in
dealing with legacies of colonialism, cultural imperialism and cultural
identity.
Homi. K Bhaba, one of the theoretical gurus of post -colonial theory
describes this phenomenon of contesting oppressive structures as the
post -colonial criticism formulate their critical revisions around
issues of cultural difference, social authority, and political
discrimination in order to reveal the antagonistic and ambivalent
moments within the "rationalisation" of modernity. In other words, what
Bhaba suggests is a common platform for all who have paid a price for
their 'difference' from the Euro-American, white or dominant culture.
Cultural difference
In further exploring this aspect of post-coloniality, Bhaba states
that "contemporary post-colonial discourses are rooted in specific
histories of cultural displacement, whether they are 'the middle
passage' of slavery or indenture, the 'voyage out' of the civilizing
mission, the fraught accommodation of the Third World migration to the
West, or traffic of economic and political refugees within and outside
the Third World." In this regard, post-coloniality also concerns about
the cultural and artistic practices negotiating with colonial histories,
globalization and neocolonial contexts.
Duncan Ivison in his book, Postcolonial Liberalism explores the
challenges to liberal understandings of justice, citizenship, and
democracy posed by the situation and the demands of indigenous peoples
in contemporary democracies. Ivison suggests, the post-colonial state
should be based primarily on three liberal values; Individuals and
people are equal, they are free and that social and political
arrangements be such as to promote the well-being of individuals and
groups in the manner that they conceive of it.
It is obvious that Invison's post-colonial liberalism is aimed at
formulating a 'form of mutually acceptable co-existence between
indigenous and non-indigenous people'. Ivison asks :"How could a
philosophical and political creed of individual rights and human dignity
not find favour with those suffering from racial or cultural
discrimination and economic and political marginalisation?"
The core values of the post-colonial liberalism underline that a
post-colonial state should be committed to rights and dignity.
Interestingly such a situation offers both challenges and opportunities
for indigenous people. One of the challenges for the indigenous people
is to contest the legitimacy of the state, particularly in the context
of state sponsored violence against tribal people including aborigines
in Asian and South American nations, and nominative concept of justice,
equality and freedom. For instance, it has been observed that in
countries such as Australia, the nominative concept of equal citizenship
has been used to justify coerce assimilation of the Aborigines.
Post-colonial writing
Like the developments in the socio-economic sphere in the
post-colonial context, a distinct development in literature negotiating
with the legacies of colonialism, cultural imperialism and cultural
identity can be defined as post-colonial writing. Pramode K Nayar
defines post-colonial writing as "the textual/ literary processes
through which formerly colonised people assert their difference from,
resistance to, and negotiate with, European colonial masters and
cultures while attempting to develop similar strategies to tackle
contemporary globalising and neoclonising processes of Euro-American
powers."
In one of the founding theorisations of 'post colonial literature',
Australian academics; Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths and Helen Tiffin
define the term 'post-colonial' "...to cover all the cultures affected
by the imperial process from the moment of colonization to the present
day. This is because there is a continuity of preoccupation throughout
the historical process initiated by European imperial aggression. We
also suggest that it is most appropriate as the term for new -cross
cultural criticism which has emerged in recent years and for the
discourse through which this is constituted."
Commonwealth literature
The wider recognition of the post-colonial literature and writing can
be traced back to 'Commonwealth literature', a term widely applied to
literature and writings emerging from former British colonies or in
other words, from Asia, Africa, Australia, South America and Ireland.
Primarily the term came into usage in the 1950s to describe writings
from Africa, Asia and South America and it has also been associated with
writers from formerly colonised nations such as Chinua Achebe (Nigeria)
and R. K. Narayan (India) and writers from white settler communities
including Australia. Although the term signifies certain equality of
former colonised nations, Salman Rushdie has pointed out in
"Commonwealth Literature - Does not Exist". Rushdie said that it compels
people from diverse countries, cultures and colonial experiences to put
into a 'ghetto' where the term indicates 'unreal, monstrous creature'.
The term Commonwealth literature has been used until it is replaced with
'Post-colonial literature'.
The dominant themes of post-colonial literature in the 1950s -1960s
were nationalism and the triumph of decolonisation. Following the
political independence, writers, artists and intellectuals who lived in
Europe returned to their nations in Asia and Africa. The early phase of
post-colonial literature, writers such as Wole Soyinka and Chinua Achebe
of Nigeria dealt with themes such as bi-culturalism (Europeans and
natives), nationalism, local and tribal identities as opposed to the
notion of universal humanism, usable history and generating a discourse
about the nature of postcolonial identity.
These themes are among the themes expounded by writers such as Raja
Rao, R. K. Narayan, George Lamming, Patrick White, and Derek Walcott in
the early phase of post-colonial literature. During this phase,
prominent among the major themes were cultural assertion and cultural
nationalism. In the 1970s, the discourse primarily focused on
overarching impact of colonialism on native cultures. Writers such as
Bhabani Bhattacharya, Kamala Markandaya (India), V.S. Naipaul
(Caribbean) and Chinua Achebe and Nggwa Thiong'o (Kenya) have further
explored these anxieties.
|