Patience exercised for over a decade paid dividends - Minister
Naveen Dissanayake
By Ranil WIJAYAPALA
Naveen Dissanayake, a politician hailing from a renowned political
family was one of the two MPs appointed to the Cabinet of President
Mahinda Rajapaksa when he made a Cabinet reshuffle after taking oaths
for his second term.
It was the patience he exercised for more than a decade that brought
him to this position, the new Minister of Public Management Reforms,
Naveen Dissanayake said.
Speaking to the Sunday Observer at his residence at Alfred House
Gardens whilst preparing to leave home (after having Kevum and Kiribath
along with well-wishers), to assume duties at this Ministry, Minister
Dissanayake said that he would have been a very unhappy and frustrated
MP today if he did not take the decision to support the Government to
end the war in 2007.
He said the country will see a change in all sectors with the
President's decision to put the country on the right track. The Minister
has been entrusted with the task of making the required changes in the
public sector to achieve that end.
Following are the excerpts of the interview:
Q: What are the functions, the role and scope of the Public
Management Reforms Ministry?
A: The Public Management Reforms Ministry was created during
the last Cabinet reshuffle to make the public service more efficient,
more transparent and more people-friendly. The Public Service involves
the Gramasevakas, the Samurdhi Niladharis, the Water Board, Ceylon
Electricity Board and so many government institutions. We have 1.3
million public servants and we want to target, the majority of them to
see that they will fast track the projects and the policies of the
Government. And also to see that the people feel when they visit a
public office that they are being served well. The scope of the Ministry
is wide. It has not been defined. It is up to the Minister and the
Ministry Secretary and the people to make sure that the public service
makes these reforms so that everyone in the country will benefit.
Q: How do you plan to work according to the extended version
of the Mahinda Chinthana?
A: Anyway this is very much part of the Mahinda Chinathana
Idiri Dekma. Without having a good public service you really can't have
a efficient Government. So we want to make sure that even in the North
and East, where the civil war disrupted the public service, that proper
mechanism are put in place to ensure the people in the North and East
are being served without any discrimination. So that they can go to any
public office, Kachcheri or local government office to get their work
done.
Q: You mentioned the public service in the North and the East.
Do you have an idea of bridging the language disparity?
A: Actually we haven't looked into this yet. We must improve
the language efficiency of the first two layers of public servants for
the Sinhalese to have a fair knowledge of Tamil and Tamils to have a
fair knowledge of Sinhala. We can't make it mandatory. Instead of making
it mandatory we will give them the options to learn basic language
skills.
Q: The President exhorted Ministers and Deputies to cut down
on wastage and corruption. What will you be doing to ensure this?
A: In my Ministry of course there is no wastage or corruption
in terms of finance. We must look at the other institutions in the
Government sector such as District Secretariats and Divisional
Secretariats and other institutions. They should be enlightened on how
to eliminate wastage. I don't think that public sector employees are
corrupt. A large number of public servants are honest. There are a bad
eggs. It's there in any system. So we must find a system to minimise
wastage. We must have a committee system in place, a good accounting
system to achieve this. We must have a private sector approach to the
management of the public sector. The perception of the public sector is
that once you get a job you look for a eight hours of work, salary and
pension. In the private sector if a person gets a job, it's on contract
and not on a permanent basis. Make him permanent in his position based
on performance. The idea of giving a permanent job straight away should
be considered critically.
Q: What is your opinion of the public service?
A: People have a negative perception on the public sector.
Because I have been a Minister and a Deputy Minister, what I have
experienced with the public sector is satisfactory. It was after putting
a lot of pressure and a lot of demands that I get things done.
The issue is for the people. The issue is for the public and their
normal experience with the public sector. The feedback I get from the
people is that it is very difficult to get things done in the public
sector. This, we have to change.
Q: You are originally from the United National Party. You
along with 17 strongmen from the UNP decided to join the government due
to the war efforts of the President. People like Karu Jayasuriya, your
father-in-law decided to go back to the UNP. What is your opinion now?
A: Since we achieved peace, now it is really a matter of
consolidating the peace. The next six years is about change,
development, reforms, whether it is the private sector or public sector,
in the financial sector, in the education sector.
I think the President is taking the country towards the right
direction. So we have to support the Government.
Q: You joined the UPFA in the year 2007. What would be your
current position if you had remainend with the UNP?
A: I would be a very frustrated MP just sitting there and
hoping that things would change, when things would not.
Q: Some MPs like Sajith Premadasa and some other groups are
trying to bring about changes in the UNP. Do you think they would
succeed?
A: I think the whole idea of change is not about individuals.
It is about policies and principles. When I was there we also started to
talk about changing the constitution and the changing the way the party
should go. I don't know how far this group will focus on these things.
Whether they are going to succeed or not we have to see. I wish them the
best, because we should always have two parties. We must have a viable
Opposition. So I hope they will succeed.
Q: You were a Deputy Minister and non-Cabinet Minister. After
the last general election you became just an MP. What was your reaction?
A: I was very clear in my thinking. I told the President that
I had the experience of serving as a Deputy Minister and Non-Cabinet
Minister and if I didn't get a good Minister to work with, I would be
wasting my time, just enjoying the perks the office, diesel vouchers and
all other facilities. If there is nothing to do, there is no point in
becoming a Deputy Minister.
So I told the President about my position and my experience as an MP
of ten years. Out of respect to him I would prefer to be just an MP. He
understood. This time he took only two MPs as Cabinet Ministers Vasudeva
Nanayakkara and me.
Q: This is your first appointment as Cabinet Minister. How do
you look at it?
A: I feel good. I have worked right throughout to achieve
this. When Ranil Wickremesinghe was Prime Minister, some juniors in the
party were made Cabinet Ministers. Sajith and I. I think we must have
patience.
Q: Do you think the decision you took in 2007 was correct?
A: Not being a Cabinet Minister I supported the President in
his efforts to end the war. The President wanted my help. I felt that
the President was taking the country on the right track. He had taken a
very clear position against the LTTE with the right people in the right
positions. His brother gave him support as Defence Secretary to continue
with the war effort.
The determination to eliminate terrorism was with the Government. I
put the idea to the UNP that we should extend our help to the Government
to finish the war. They did not do that. They signed an agreement and
supported the Budget in 2006, but made various statements against the
agreement.
That is why I decided to join the Government, and not because it
expected a position in the Government. The President gave us those
positions as a legal cover. I am happy because I contributed in some way
for the Government to finish the war.
Q: You have said that the younger generation in this country
is not getting enough chances in politics. Now opportunities are
available for youngsters to enter politics. What is your opinion?
A: The President wants to bring in a lot of young people to
the Provincial Councils. Women also were given opportunities to enter
politics. I think it should happen naturally.
The female population is not properly represented in Parliament. If
women are voting for women there should be more women representation in
the Parliament. Political parties field women candidates but people do
not vote for them. We have to bring in young blood to takeover from the
old.
Q: Are you happy about present representation of the young in
the Parliament?
A: There are a lot of good young MPs in Parliament. In ten
years time when they come into leadership they will have a lot of
experience and they will have a lot of ideas about development, because
the situation has changed.
A lot of funding is coming for development projects compared to the
last 10 to 20 years. For the past 10 to 20 years people were frustrated,
the country was stagnating. The situation is now changed.
Q: Your name was mentioned that you were to join the
Opposition again. Why was this?
A:It was during the Presidential election in which Sarath
Fonseka was contesting that the issue came up. My brother supported
Sarath Fonseka at the election.
But I never wanted to support him. I only supported the President.
That was why my name came in.
Q: Have you had problems due to different opinion on politics
among family members ?
A: One should not entertain family relations when dealing with
politics. My brother's views on politics are different from mine.
Q: What is your opinion on the development drive launched by
the Government ?
A: It is a massive development drive - ports, highways, power,
education, Gama Neguma and Jathika Saviya. All those are excellent
ideas. A few years back there was not even a single tar road in the
villages of the Nuwara Eliya district. The villages in the district see
a massive development. It is a positive sign.
Q: Are you happy with the development in the Nuwara Eliya
district ?
A: I am happy. If you ask my satisfaction level I would say
it's five to six out of ten. I am not hundred per cent happy. I haven't
got funding. But during my lifetime I will do my best for the district.
Q: What is your plan for the Nuwara Eliya district ?
A: My plan is to develop the infrastructure in the district. I
want to develop the Nuwara Eliya town, the school Gamini Vidyalaya and
the hospital. In the villages I want to see infrastructure developed. I
want to see roads developed. That is the sort of development I want to
see there.
Q: During the budget vote the Tamil National Alliance
abstained from voting. Is this a positive sign ?
A: I think the TNA also understood the gravity of Sri Lankan
politics. As far as the President is concerned there is no point of
trying to stop him or block him all the time, because he will be the
President for another six years. There is a possibility that he may
continue for a further six years also. It is good to courage the
President and be constructive instead of trying to block him.
When you come to a certain point, you can listen to him and he can
listen to you. I think the TNA has understood that. They also want
something positive for their people. They want development, education
and all what is going to other areas in the country to come to their
people also. The President wants to do that, because we all are Sri
Lankans.
Q: Do you think that the Government can address the issues of
the minorities in the North and East ?
A: It is not a question of the government can or government
will. It has to be addressed. Because we must understand the root
causes. Why a person like Prabhakaran came into existence, why a
movement like the LTTE came into existence. If we don't understand and
push this under the carpet and say that it was just a law and order
issue that is not the case. I am not saying this because they killed my
father. The LTTE was a ruthless and brutal terrorist organisation. You
cannot justify the existence of an organisation like that.
Q: What is your aim in your political career ?
A: My aim is to get as much as resources for the people in the
Nuwara Eliya district to develop the district and its people. |