Local Government elections:
The current scenario
By Jaliya WIJEYEKOON
Local Government election fever is gradually and steadily hotting up
in all parts of the country with barely a month away for the grand day
where the present rulers expect to consolidate their position and the
people in opposition camp strive hard to attain power and set up new
local government bodies.
Local Government bodies had been in existence even prior to the
independence in the country and they were known as Village Councils,
Town Councils, Urban Councils and Municipal Councils. Urban Councils and
Municipal Councils still operate under the same names but with wider
powers vested in them with the introduction of the 13th Amendment to the
constitution in 1987. VCs and TCs were done away with the introduction
of the 13th Amendment and replaced with Pradeshiya Sabhas.
The administrative areas were re-demarcated based on the population,
strength of the economy and number of Grama Niladhari Divisions and
every Pradeshiya Sabha area is covered by a Divisional Secretary, a SLAS
officer appointed by the Central Government.
Prior to 1987 the formation of these local bodies was quite deferent.
All local bodies had a Ward System, From Municipal Council down to
Village Councils, all had a set of Wards which were represented by party
members and sometimes by independent individuals. Any local body which
wins the majority number of members from one party elect its Chairman
and take over the administration for a specified period of four years.
During those olden days, the whole election process of the local
bodies was very simple and there were hardly any election related
violence reported. Candidates from different political parties and
independent individuals contested every ward in the local bodies and
whoever who gets the majority number of votes gets elected as the member
of the ward. The party which secure the majority number of members
elects the Chairman. There had been occasions in the past where the
single independent member was elected as the Chairman of some village
councils with the support of majority party members.
Unlike the present day when the elections are announced and
nominations called for, the provincial party leaders nominate their
candidates for every ward in their respective councils and they
virtually nominate the Chairman of the council also to lead the election
campaign. So the struggle for the chairman post didn’t arise those days
very much except in few occasions.
Every ward of the council had a separate polling station and even the
counting of votes was done at the same place by the Presiding Officer in
the presence of candidates and declares the official results before
darkness falls.
During those early days only the people with standing calibre and
respectable backgrounds who commnded the respect of the area people,
took part in local politics with the pure intention of discharging an
honourable service. There had been instances in the past where some ward
members were elected uncontested and became the Chairmen of the Village
Councils. Local bodies were the breeding ground of promising politicians
in the past in this country. Statesmen like S. W. R. D. Bandaranaike, J.
R. Jayewardene and Ranasinghe Premadasa rose to the zenith of the
political career starting their political life as Ward Members of
Colombo Municipal Council. In addition to the above there was a large
number of Senior Ministers who read ABC in politics as Village Council
members in their respective areas and who rendered an invaluable service
to the country at latter stages of their political careers.
During those olden days no regular monthly salary was paid to the
Council Members or to the Chairmen, but a nominal fee for every sitting
in the council.
Pradeshiya Sabhas
However, with the passage of time lots of changes took place and
specially with the introduction of the 13th Amendment to the
Constitution, Pradeshiya Sabhas came into being replacing VCs and TCs
and local Authority Elections Act was also changed and it was further
amended by Act No. 25 of 1990.
Elections for Local Bodies were held under the new system for the
first time in 1991 and elections in March 2011 would be the fifth
occasion when the elections are conducted under this system.
Quite apart from those by gone days politics have now become a
lucrative profession and all parties are equally interested in winning
the election by any means to establish their political empires
provincially. Candidates are even more anxious to attain power and
resort to every mean tactic since they are sure of enjoying the perks,
power and privileges when they are elected as members.
Rejected nominations
Rejection of Nomination lists submitted by political parties and
Independent groups is not a new phenomenon in the election history of
Sri Lanka after the new preferential voting system was introduced by the
13th Amendment to the constitution for the local Government elections.
But most unfortunately it had happened in an unprecedented scale this
year with the rejection of over 75 nominations lists submitted by major
political parties and independent groups. Now both major parties are
seeking legal redress for their rejections which is very unlikely to
attain their desired ends. If they had properly scrutinized the
nomination papers before submitting to the returning officers this
unfortunate situation could have been avoided.
However, now it is quite evident that both the major parties, UPFA
and UNP and communally based parties such as SLMC and TNA have already
launched their local election campaign to woo the support of the masses
for their camps.
Strategy of minor parties
SLMC is contesting in certain areas of the country under its symbol
and for some other bodies SLMC is contesting with the UPFA. It had been
the practice of minor parties to join one of the main parties to contest
polls in order to get a certain percentage of members for them. There
are nearly twenty parties which have joined the UPFA this year to
contest local polls. JVP is the only other party which contests Local
Government Elections 2011 without entering into an alliance with any of
the major parties.
In the meantime some political parties tried to persuade the
government to postpone the election due to the adverse climatic
conditions which prevailed in the county during the last two months
causing havoc over certain districts with severe inundations, However,
elections department is quite confident of holding the election
uninterrupted since the weather has improved at present.
The run-up to the election campaign began with the promulgation of
allotted numbers to the candidates and now it is becoming hotter and
hotter in some parts of the country with only a less than a month to go
for the crucial day. A few election related violence have been reported
already and invariably there will be attacks, counter attacks and
numerous conflicts when the campaign is at its peak within the next few
weeks.
Government stance
UPFA is extremely confident of winning the local government elections
2011 due to a number of reasons. Their main argument is that the people
are now enjoying the real freedom after the protracted war which ravaged
the country for over 30 years. The United National Party is in a mess
with its leadership struggle and no proper program of work has been put
forward by the party to attract the masses to their fold. Further when
the UPFA is the governing party and also the provincial councils are
dominated by them and the support of the entire minority communities are
also with the government, how can the UNP win any of the local bodies?
is the argument of UPFA stalwarts.
Besides, the government has already fulfilled a number of its
previous election pledges and taken steps to improve the living
standards of the people according to the Central Bank figures in respect
of per capita income and the increased development growth rate of the
country during the last two years.
UNP claims
The United National Party has got a new lease of life after their
annual convention held two months back. At present the UNP platform has
become vociferous and openly challenges the government over the
forthcoming Local Government elections. The UNP also suffered the
rejection of their nomination lists for some councils but comparatively
it was very much less than what Government party suffered. Therefore the
UNP stalwarts are of the strong belief and claim that they are already
ahead its rivals in the fray.
The UNP platform is very critical of the Government for not
appointing the Independent Commissions, very high cost of living,
violation of human rights and media freedom, non availability of
essential food items and the unprecedented degree of corruption taking
place in all so called development projects and the failure of the
government to address the grievances of the IDPs in time and further
inability to look after the welfare of floods stricken victims in 17
districts. UNP has spearheaded the election campaign mainly based on the
above allegations against the government and they are quite confident of
convincing the people and win a majority number of Local Government
bodies at the forthcoming elections.
|