
Celebrity culture
Assumption: Wicky and Micky don’t have much in common. One dresses in
red meat; the other doesn’t even eat the stuff. One writes lyrics like
“I want your ugly, I want your disease, I want your everything as long
as it’s free.” The other writes philosophy. But they are both cultural
celebrities, and the media gravitates to them for comments. And they
both have used this celebrity status to weigh in on all issues under the
Sri Lankan sun. A celebrity culture is the structure that influences
those deemed to be celebrities. Any medium can be viewed as a vehicle
for creating a celebrity culture.
The famous religious books of the world’s faiths are replete with
examples of individuals who are well known by the general public. Some
of the pharaohs of ancient Egypt set in motion devices to ensure their
own fame for centuries to come. Celebrity culture, once restricted to
royalty and biblical/mythical figures, has pervaded many sectors of
society including business, publishing, and even academia.
Profile
With every scientific advance, names have become attached to
discoveries. Especially for large contributions to humanity, the
contributor is usually regarded honourably. Mass media has increased the
exposure and power of celebrity. A trend has developed that celebrity
carries with it increasingly more social capital than in earlier times.
A celebrity is a person who has a prominent profile in the media and is
easily recognised.
If one is famous, then he is considered a celebrity. Celebrity status
might be associated with certain professions and frequent appearances in
the media. People may become celebrities in a wide range of ways: from
their professions, following appearances in the mass media, or even by
complete accident or infamy. The term “instant celebrity” describes
someone who becomes a celebrity in a very short period of time.
In some place, someone who achieves a small amount of transient fame
(through, say, hype or mass media) may become labelled a “B-grade
celebrity”. Often the generalisation extends to someone who falls short
of mainstream or persistent fame but who seeks to extend or exploit it.
In the 21st century, public fascination with celebrities and demand
for celebrity gossip gave rise to the gossip columnist, tabloids,
paparazzi and celebrity blogging.
Early recorded instances of celebrity include the winners at the
Olympic games in ancient Greece. Winners of the games promoted their
fame by commissioning hymns praising their exploits.
In ancient Rome, portraits of powerful men appeared stamped on coins.
Works of art bearing their likenesses further enhanced their fame.
Gladiators could also gain considerable fame as news of their victories
spread by word of mouth.
In the 16th and early 17th centuries repeated performances of
Shakespeare’s plays contributed to his fame. Writers gained recognition
as literacy levels improved and reading became a form of entertainment.
Many consider Lord Byron the archetype of the modern day super stars
of the film world. On the success of his first long poem, Childe
Harold’s Pilgrimage Byron stated “I went to bed one night and simply
woke up famous.”
In the Victorian era authors such as Charles Dickens built up their
popularity by publishing their work in newspapers and magazines.
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the explosion of mass
reproduced images made it possible for people of lower spheres of
culture, e.g. the popular entertainment industry, to become huge
celebrities. Growth in the number of media channels in the late 20th
century led to increased exposure for celebrities. In the early 21st
century there are more celebrities than previously.
Scope
The rise of international celebrities in acting and popular music
originates in large part in the scope and scale of the media industries,
enabling celebrities to be viewed more often and in more places. Most
cultures and regions have their own independent celebrity systems, with
distinct hierarchies of popular film, television and sports stars. A
person who garners a degree of fame in one culture may be considered
less famous or obscure in another. Some nationwide celebrities might
command some attention outside their own nation.
Some professional activities, being highly paid, exposed and in which
it is difficult to excel are likely to confer celebrity status in
themselves.
For example, movie stars and television actors with lead roles in
prominently scheduled shows are likely to become celebrities.
High-ranking politicians, businessmen, national television reporters,
radio personalities, daytime television show hosts, “supermodels”,
successful athletes, porn stars and chart-topping musicians are also
likely to become celebrities.
A few humanitarian leaders such as Mother Teresa have even achieved
fame because of their charitable work. Some people have achieved fame
online and thus are Internet celebrities. While some film and theatre
directors, producers, fashion designers, artists, authors, trial
lawyers, scientists, journalists and dancers have achieved celebrity
status, celebrity is not a necessity for success in these fields.
In Sri Lanka we do have a few real celebrities though we have many a
clowns from many a field who consider themselves celebrities. We have
celebrities who are that for being more infamous than for any
illustriousness; and, in fact, the profession of politics is the best
example where there is an extraordinary concentration of such
celebrities.
A common complaint of modern celebrity culture is that the public,
instead of seeking virtues or talents in celebrities, seek those who are
the most willing to break ethical boundaries, or those who are most
aggressive in self-promotion. In other words, infamy has replaced fame.
The social role of the town drunk, the court jester, or the sexually
indecent are not new, but arguably, the glorification of these
individuals is. One possible explanation of this trend is that an
artificial i mportance has been created in order to promote a product or
a service, rather than to record a purely biographical event.
As more new products are launched in a world market that is
constantly expanding, the need for more celebrities has become an
industry in itself. Another possible explanation is that this
exaggeration of modern celebrity culture is created out of a need for
drama and spectacle. Celebrity involvement in local and global affairs
is nothing new. Mark Twain, for instance, spoke out against the genocide
in the Belgian Congo at the turn of the century.
Helen Keller was a prominent anti-war activist. But it seems that
over the past decade, more and more celebrities have gotten involved in
all kinds of nonsensical affairs. It’s almost as if they’ve been
instructed, like beauty contest aspirants or rising high school juniors,
to add some gravitas to their resumes by choosing an issue to become
passionate about. But how many of our celebrities do get involved in
issues that require dissent.
Noble
There is something inherently noble about the celebrity dissident,
but there is something slightly ridiculous about the celebrity wonk.
It’s when celebrities do what comes naturally to them ‘cuddling up to
power’ that they become slightly ridiculous. Power and popularity are
the lifeblood of celebrity culture.
Only if cultural icons go against the grain and risk unpopularity do
they engage in an inherently noble enterprise. Alas, Sri Lanka is barren
in that respect. See you this day next week. Until then, keep thinking,
keep laughing. Life is mostly about these two activities.
For views, reviews, encomiums and brick-bats : |