Buddhist confessional poetry:
Narratives of self-conversion
[Part 7]
The Therigatha represents one of the earliest examples of poetry
inspired by feminist desires. These poems may not conform to all the
preferences and priorities of modern feminism; however, they stand out
as interesting examples of early feminist thinking. These poems were
written against a background of strong patriarchal thinking and
patriarchal practices. The fact that these confessional poems come out
of a deeply religious traditions makes their commitment to and
innovativeness in female agency even more compelling. At a time when
most religious thought, predictably enough, was strongly influenced by
androcentric agendas, the fact that these Buddhist nuns in their verses
were able to go against the grain of contemporary thinking and acquire a
sense of agency in their determined quest for spiritual liberation is
indeed highly laudable.
The Theirigatha represents the efforts of nuns, drawn from all walks
of life, who gave up household life and decided to devote their time and
energy to the attainment of spiritual enlightenment. They came from
diverse backgrounds, old and young, rich and poor, nobles and
prostitutes, widows, wives, mothers, daughters. They were all united in
their determination to give up domestic pleasures, shatter the bonds of
patriarchal practices and enter the Buddhist order. These female
renunciates exemplify one important aspect of feminist thinking. They
carved out for themselves an alternate life style that went against the
dominant thinking of the time; it emerged and gathered momentum in an
unmistakably male-dominated society that placed manifold impediments.
Visions
The institutions, practices, cultural discourses, religious visions
during this period were heavily inflected by patriarchal impulses. What
these Buddhist nuns who composed these confessional poems collected in
the Therigatha sought to demonstrate was that women should have the same
opportunity that men had for achieving spiritual liberation; that
religious thinking (dharma) made no distinctions between males and
females. Some of the statements of these nuns clearly attest to this
fact. In addition, the Buddhist order that took shape, allowing the
entry of women reflects the strength, solidity and the size of the
women’s order. This was a severe blow to the kind of thinking prevalent
at the time which tended to minimize the role and importance of women.
Some critics and adversaries at the time raised questions about the
intelligence, stamina, self discipline of women to carry out the rigors
of Buddhist religious practices and secure total detachment from worldly
pleasures. The verses contained in the Theirigatha stand as an open
rebuke to that line of retrogressive thinking.
Many poems in the Therigatha illustrate the depth of feeling and
revulsion against domesticity that impelled these nuns towards
renunciation. For example, the following poem by an anonymous nun
manifests this deeply felt antipathy:
Sleep well
Little sister
Wearing dresses
That you yourself stitched.
Your desires are put out
Like wilted vegetables
In a cooking-pot.
What is interesting about this short poem is the way the poets has
invoked an image drawn from domestic life to clinch her point. The life
that the nun turned her back on as away of attaining spiritual
enlightenment is captured beautifully in this image. The following poem
by the nun Mutta dramatizes powerfully the indifference she felt towards
household life.
I am well released
Truly released from
Three crooked things –
The mortar, the pestle
And my husband.
I am released from the wheel
Of life; the spinner of
Rounds and rounds of being
Has been conquered.
Disenchantment
The disenchantment with worldly life is deeply etched in the verbal
texture of the poem. In some of the poems in the Therigatha, the nuns
are able to stand up to the demands of men and whole their ground. Their
steadfastness, we are allowed to see, emanates from deeply held
religious convictions. In the following poem, death in the form of a
young man seeks to seduce the nun Khema .
You are young and radiant
I am young and handsome
Listening to the five fold harmonies
Let us seek our ecstasy
To this request, the nun Khema replies fervently in the negative.
My body is vile, ashamed of it
It is a site of decay and disease
I have rooted out desire
Sensual pleasures are like
Swords and daggers
Ingredients of life are
A chopping block for them
What you see as sensual ecstasies are
To me the exact opposite.
The strength of the response indexes her agency. In some of the poems
we see how the nuns pursued their spiritual goal with unswerving
determination in the teeth of sever odds but also were able to direct
others along the path of righteousness and allow them the opportunity to
enter the Buddhist order.
Complex
When discussing the complex relationship between feminism and these
early confessional poems by Buddhist nuns it is important to bear in
mind the fact that some of the nuns opted to follow the path laid out by
the Buddha after much deliberation. At a time during which the
intelligence of women were held in low esteem, some of the nuns were
clearly able to display their sharp powers of reasoning and balanced
judgment. For example, the nun Bhadda was initially associated with the
Jain community; she enjoyed a wide reputation as an able teacher. She
once entered into a debate with the reverend Sariputta and was forced to
accept defeat. Subsequently, she decided to enter the Buddhist order.
This is how the actual ordination is captured in the poem.
With my head shaven
Wearing dust, with one robe,
I roamed imaging a blemish
Where there was none,
And not seeing the blemish
When it was clearly there
Leaving my space of refuse
In Mount Gijjakuta
I happened to see the blemishless
Buddha, surrounded by monks
Having fallen at his feet
Having paid respects
I stood in awe before the Buddha
Come Bhadda he uttered
And I was ordained.
Similarly, the poem by the nun Nanduttara illustrates the
independence of mind displayed by these nuns. She hailed from a Brahmin
background and had later entered the community of Jains. She was a
prominent member of the collective spearheaded by the famous Nighantha
Nathaputra. She adhered to the strict rules, regulations and practices
endorsed by Jainism. One day, she chanced to hear a sermon delivered by
the venerable Mahamoggallana. She was totally persuaded, and chose to
become a Buddhist nun. This is the poem by the nun Nanduttara.
I worshipped the fire, moon and sun
And other divine beings.
I visited river-banks and ritually
Dived into the waters.
Undertaking vows
I shaved my head
The earth became my bed
I abstained from food at night.
Exulting in finery and ornaments
Through bathing and massaging
I ministered to my body.
Urged on by sensual desire
Then receiving faith
I entered the houseless state
And saw the body as it was
I have put out the desires
For sensual pleasure
Defeating rebirth
Eliminating desire
Free from all bonds
I have attained perfect peace
So what we see in the confessional Buddhist nuns are a number of
vital strands that comport with feminist thinking as it has developed in
modern times. The ideas of female agency, the willingness to take charge
of their lives, the strength of character needed to fight for what they
think is right and just, the capacity to think independently and being
unafraid to challenge certain interdictions of patriarchy are among
them. This is not to suggest that there is a perfect congruity between
the vision emanating from these poems and the formulations of modern
feminism as put into circulation by Western thinkers. Therefore, let us
first consider the essential outlines of modern feminism,
Modern feminists seek to focus on the complex ways in which power
relations pertaining to gender are constituted, reproduced, affirmed,
and contested in modern societies. Therefore, the aim of feminists is to
bring about a transformation in power relations between males and
females in day to day living. Modern feminists, quite rightly in my
judgment, focus on the nature of patriarch and how it works to oppress
women. In patriarchy men exercise power in ways that serve to keep women
in bondage. This arises from the ways in which social discourses are
constructed and naturalzed based on physiological sexual differences. As
a consequence, the attitudes related to the behavior, roles, working
conditions of women are defined in accordance with long-established male
norms. It is this mode of thinking that modern feminists seek to
challenge and displace.
It is important to bear in mind that there are different schools of
feminism despite that fact that all are united by a passionate
conviction that women should be granted parity of status as free
citizens and the patriarchal structure that underwrites the manifold
injustices against women need to be eliminated. Commentators on this
subject have identifies such groups of feminists as liberal, radical,
socialist and women of color. It is indeed the declared aim of liberal
feminists to obtain parity of status and equality of opportunity for
women in diverse spheres of activity without seeking to bring about a
fundamental change in the existing social and political systems. Radical
feminists envision a society in which women will not be under the
dominion of men and full individuality of womanhood will be guaranteed.
In order to achieve this goal, it is argued, that the true femininity of
women has to be re-discovered and this entails the upending of
patriarchal structures in society. It is the considered judgment of
socialist feminists that patriarchy as an oppressive social system is
closely related with racial and class oppressions. Consequently, the
aims of feminists can be attained only by a restructuring of the social
system that gives equal attention to issues of gender, race and class.
The women of color constitute a different group. They would argue
that the experiences and hence the agendas, of women who were subjected
to colonial subjugation are not the same as women of the industrially
advanced countries. Their subject-positions and historical experiences
are different. Therefore, their understanding of feminism cannot be the
same as that of white feminists. While recognizing that all feminists
share certain features in common, it is argued that there are certain
differences and they have to be recognized and folded into the equation.
Feminists also argue that in order to understand the true complexity
of their predicament and find efficacious ways of eliminating
oppressions and injustices, theoretical sophisticated approaches,
methodologies, strategies have to be forged. Newer vocabularies of
analysis have to be fashioned. This means that paying solely to women’s
experiences is not adequate. Experience is indubitably important; and
transforming social relations demands urgent attention; at the same
time, it needs to be recognized that the nature of knowledge production
and how best to understand it are equally important. This is where
sophisticated theory enters the picture. It is no accident that some of
the most far-reaching analyses in humanities and social sciences have
come from the theoretical explorations of feminist.
What some modern feminists are saying is that while the idea of
experience is certainly important, it should not be treated
unproblematically. It has to be theorized so that we can fully
understand its ramifications. It is through these theoretical
inquisitions that we will be able to map the complex intersections
between representations of experience, social dynamics, power and
resistance. It is in these explorations that we will be able to
comprehend the ways in which social structures, social discourses shape
and contain experiences. In other words this understanding should give
equal emphasis to the material and discursive dimensions. One very
important site of these deliberations that is increasingly becoming
important is that of language. In order to understand the deeper
meanings of femininity, feminine experiences and feminine agendas, we
need to pay close attention to how language has become a site for
construction and negotiation of meaning.
The theory of femininity that modern thinkers are working towards
encompasses the interplays between language, power, subjectivity and
social structure. As women’s movements have spread across the globe
issues of control of the female body, acquiring a sense of agency,
sexual division of labor, equality of access to work and social power,
representations of women’s experiences have assumed an ever greater
importance. These issues are vitally connected with language.
As our primary focus is on feminism and literary textuality, this
focus on language and the theorizations on the determinative role of
language becomes important. Language is the site where social structures
and social processes are produced; in addition it is the site where our
subjectivity, our understandings and images of ourselves are produced.
Moreover this subjecthood is not unified, self-contained and harmonious
but fragmented and fissured. These divisions are both reflected in and
shaped by language.
It is for this reason that modern feminist theorists, in their
different formulations, have been quick to give pride of place to the
central role of language. The term discourse has assumed a significant
space in modern analysis. And discourse which is produced through
language points to the diverse and rival ways in which we attribute
meaning to society and the world. If we examine the writings of leading
feminist theorists such as Julia Kristeva, Helene Cixous, Luce Irigaray,
Gayatri Spivak, Judith Butler, Monique Wittig, Shoshana Felman we begin
to perceive the centrality of language. When we attempt to locate the
poems gathered in the Therigatha in the framework of modern feminist
analysis we need to keep in mind the crucial role of language. As we are
dealing with literary texts, this imperative becomes doubly significant.
Literary critics who choose to be influenced by feminism are
interested in examining the ways in which gender is constructed and
represented in literary texts. What feminist scholars are invested in is
not only the question of recognition the salience of women’s writings
but also in the need to rethink and re-imagine the whole enterprise of
literary study itself. This necessitates a focus on the intricate
relationships between language, power, subjectivity, ideology. Certain
theorists, among them like Irigaray and Cixous, have sought to identify
differences that exist between males and females in their deployment of
language using some of the concepts of the eminent poststructuralist
psychoanalyst Jacque Lacan’s related to the symbolic order. It is with
newer conceptual developments such as these in mind that we need to
examine the nature of feminist thinking inscribed in the Therigatha..
I pointed out earlier some facets of the poems in Therigatha such as
the acquisition of agency, challenges to the patriarchal order, the
willingness to defy convention in the interests of larger social and
spiritual goals, the privileging of independence of mind, which conform
to the basic thinking of feminism which should command our attention.
However, when judging them as feminist literary texts we need to draw on
the newer thinking inspired by the revelations of language as a central
site of the construction of meaning and subjectivity. Let us consider
some stanzas from the long poem by the nun Sumedha
Sumedha was born in the city of Mantavati as the daughter of King
Konca. As she attained womanhood, her parents wished to give her in
marriage to a prince named Anikaratta. However, she had other ideas in
mind. From childhood, she was in the habit of visiting the Buddhist
nuns’ quarters along with other princesses. There she was introduced to
the teaching of the Buddha and she had resolved firmly to put an end to
the cycle of birth and death. When Sumedha heard about the decision of
her parents, she told them that she was not interested in household
life. Their efforts to dissuade her failed; she cut of her hair,
concentrated on physical decay; she attained spiritual enlightenment.
These are a few stanzas from this long poem that holds up to indictment
the attachments to sensual pleasure.
Sensual pleasures are like
A butcher’s knife and a chopping block.
Sensual pleasures are like
Like the head of a snake.
They smolder like a fire-brand’
They are like a bony skeleton.
Sensual pleasures are volatile
They generate pain, are poisonous
They are like heated globs of iron
The root of evil with pain as fruit.
Sensual pleasures are like swords and spears
A pestilence, a tumor, root of evil
Like a furnace of coal, the root of evil, fear, destruction.
These passages draw attention to a number of interesting features of
the poems in the Therigatha. All of them are vitally linked to the
verbal texture, the linguistic weave, of the poem. First the
self-positioning of the nun Sumedha is important. She recounts the story
from a position of spiritual strength; she has triumphed over sensual
living and realized spiritual enlightenment. The way she addresses her
parents and Prince Anikaratta even before she became a nun reflects that
position of strength. There is a role reversal here. This is connected
to the feminist structure of feeling that I was referring to. Normally
women would meekly submit to the dictates of the father or the husband;
here the situation is different. She stands up for her passionate
convictions and thereby underlines the importance of female agency.
The poem is full of vivid images that call attention to the folly of
clinging onto sensual pleasures. What is interesting about these images
is that not only are they striking but they are also deeply
male-centered; the activities indexed by the images are largely those
associated with males and male activities.. Here Sumedha employs them as
a woman and in the process undercuts the power of the patriarchal
discourse. She deploys the very rhetorical underpinnings of androcentric
domination to subvert them. I said earlier that the idea of role
reversal is central to the rhetorical architecture of the poem, and this
move further strengthens this.
The entire poem is structured on rhetoric of persuasion; this is
indeed a trait discernible in many other poems contained in the
Therigatha. Sumedha from the vey beginning seeks to persuade her
parents, Prince Anikaratta, of the importance of renunciation.
Ultimately, this is what the poem seeks to accomplish in terms of the
readers – to persuade them of the need to re-examine the nature of
worldly existence and to resolve to pursue a path of spiritual renewal.
The narrative structure of the poem, the tropes, the locutions, and the
clear didactic passages, serve to reinforce this point.
The pervasive image that emerges from this poem is that of a nun who
is deeply committed and unwavering in her resolve to enter the Buddhist
order. Qualities such as firmness of conviction, independence of mind,
decisiveness, the ability to influence others, self-confidence and
critical intelligence are normally associated with men. However, in this
poem the nun Sumedha displays all these virtues and wins our moral
sympathy. Another reason, then, why this poem by the nun Sumedha should
be regarded as a poem with feminist leanings is because of this
usurpation of male-associated qualities to advance her own agenda. What
I have sought to do in my discussion is to train a critical gaze on the
verbal texture of the poems in Therigatha, drawing on the cumulative
insights of modern literary theory. This is indeed a task fraught with
peril, but it can also bring in its train indubitable advantages.
As we examine the idea of confession that finds articulation in the
Therigatha, it is important to bear in mind that feminist thinking is
also culturally-inflected; how cultures address feminist issues is a
topic of inordinate interest.
( to be continued)
|