Exams: Questions to ponder
They say that two things cannot be avoided in life; death and taxes.
There is another thing that you cannot avoid in modern society - some
sort of education. And with education come exams, those dreaded events
which send a chill down many a student’s spine.
But examinations are necessary to gauge the progress of students.
There are few other ways for teachers and educationists to know how
their students are faring. All over the world, Governments and education
authorities conduct examinations to determine whether the students are
literally up to the mark and whether they deserve to pursue higher
education.
In Sri Lanka, there are three major school examinations which often
determine the fate of students, education-wise. They are the Year 5
Scholarship Examination, the General Certificate of Education (GCE)
Ordinary Level (Year 10/11) and GCE Advanced Level (Year 12/13). These
three examinations have become entrenched in our education system to the
extent that most students think of nothing else. Passing exams has
become the primary goal of education for most students and parents,
because each exam ladder represents, in today’s scenario, an entry
ticket to the next step in education.
Statistics
We pen these words in the light of the recent release of the GCE O/L
results by the Examinations Department. The media also highlighted
several revealing facts and statistics with regard to the examination.
Nearly 60 per cent of the (school) candidates have qualified to enter
GCE A/L classes; nearly 900 students have obtained A passes for all
subjects; the failure rate for mathematics has decreased; around 12,000
students have failed all subjects; results of 463 students have been
withheld for various reasons; among the students with best results
islandwide are those from outstation schools.
These statistics should be considered in the context of the entire
education system which is gradually seeing reforms in line with the
latest educational trends in other countries.
It is commendable that 60 percent of students have qualified to enter
GCE A/L classes, but our focus should also be on the 40 per cent who did
not. Granted, some of them will repeat the exam this year and get
through, but the vast majority will have to look elsewhere.
This story is repeated at the A/Ls, where only around 20,000 students
with good results can actually enter universities each year.
It is too drastic to term this situation as a failure of the
education system per se, but other avenues have to be found for the rest
of the students. The re-introduction of job-oriented vocational subjects
can help. Some schools regularly conduct career guidance fairs for the
benefit of students which point the way towards future prospects.
There is a tendency among some teachers and parents to propel
students towards particular educational streams, although the students’
real talents may lie elsewhere.
If a child loves music, it could be better to nurture that instinct
instead of pushing him or her to study science. If he or she fails in
that stream, two chances are generally lost - it could be too late to
pursue a career in music as well.
Schools should address the failure rate for subjects such as English,
vernacular languages and mathematics, in addition to tackling the vast
numbers of students who fail all subjects. Are there new ways to make
some of these subjects more enticing and exciting? Can they be more
aligned with, and relevant to, life skills? What are the alternative
avenues that can be opened for students who fail all or some subjects at
the two major exams? These are questions that deserve attention.
Another news item related to the GCE A/L examination shocked us to
the core. A girl had taken her life apparently because she failed the
exam.
Incident
This is a very tragic incident that should not be viewed in isolation
as a one-off. Similar events have happened earlier. Due to the
‘rat-race’ nature of the education system, our students are under
intense pressure to perform even beyond their expectations and abilities
at exams.
Parents and teachers unduly pressure all students to gain top marks
at exams, because that is the gateway to more educational opportunities.
But as we have seen, not all can get through.
As this tragic episode illustrates rather well, some students are ill
equipped to deal with the aftermath of failure.
They think that parents and teachers will shun them and the society
will have no use for them. But this need not be the case.
Parents and teachers must clearly show that life means more than
passing an examination. If we analyse the lives of some of the greatest
individuals in world history, a common streak is that they have not been
all that brilliant on the education front. The message is that you can
shine even if you fail an exam. It is up to the society and authorities
to provide such students with more opportunities.
The tuition trap is another hallmark of our education system.
Incredibly, there are tuition classes even for students in Year One! It
is baffling as to what extra material they could learn from a tuition
class. Parents should assess whether it is worthwhile sending such young
children to so-called tuition classes.
The idea of extra classes only makes sense in the upper classes and
even then, students must ask themselves whether their school learning
experience for a particular subject is inadequate before opting for
tuition.
The authorities are keen on addressing one other problem which has
perhaps given rise to the tuition system in the first place: Not all
schools are equal. Many schools, especially in rural areas still lack
various facilities and teachers. In fact, this is why there is a
scramble for ‘good’ schools at Year One and Year Six (following the
Scholarship Exam) among parents.
The simplest solution is to have equally good schools all over the
island, which will obviate the need to hunt for leading schools.
The fact that some rural schools have reported very good results at
the GCE O/L points to a future where every school will be a ‘good’
school.
|