SL UPR: Good foundation for March sessions
By Manjula Fernando
The progress Sri Lanka has shown in the Human Rights front after the
end of the conflict has been acknowledged by over 80 per cent of the 99
countries that spoke at the Universal Periodic Review on Sri Lanka held
at Room XX at the Palais des Nations in Geneva on November 1.
Geneva, SWITZERLAND: Special envoy of the Sri Lanka’s President
for Human Rights, Minister Mahinda Samarasinghe (2nd L)
addresses the United Nations (UN) Human Rights Council to face a
periodic review of the human rights situation in Sri Lanka on
November 1, 2012 in Geneva. -AFP |
President’s Special Envoy on Human Rights, Minister Mahinda
Samarasinghe said, a record 99 countries inscribed and all of them took
the floor during the three and a half hour time allotted to Sri Lanka’s
HR review session.
”The Sri Lankan team was highly taken up by the enthusiasm shown by
the world community to get updated on the developments taking place in
post conflict Sri Lanka”, speaking on the phone from Geneva on Friday,
Minister Samarasinghe said. The 99 countries that spoke included 37 HRC
members and 61 observers.
Minister Samarasinghe opened the debate with a speech, presenting one
by one, the great strides the country has made following the defeat of
terrorism and explaining what it hoped to do in addressing the remaining
issues. “On other occasions we have only three to four minutes to put on
record our side of the story, but at the UPR we had 70 minutes and we
took our time and explained in detail all what we have done at ground
level.”
He tabled specific examples of the areas the country has completed in
implementing the national action plan of the LLRC. “One of the
criticisms levelled against Sri Lanka was the failure to implement the
LLRC recommendations. I showed the international community specific
examples of what we had done and questioned if they did not see them as
progressive. This was very effective.”
The Minister pointed out, one of the key pledges at Sri Lanka’s first
peer review in 2008, a National Action Plan for the Promotion and
Protection of Human Rights (NHRAP) have been completed and begun
implementing.
Pointing out that Sri Lanka, a small country in the world map, like
any post-conflict polity, faced challenges of a magnitudinal scope that
were truly daunting, had been able to fulfil most of its obligations in
a short span of time. These included a massive 300,000 population being
resettled, a challenge even a developed country would have struggled to
fulfil.
Among the achievements that the international community hailed at the
UPR were: setting up of the Task Force to monitor and implement the LLRC
recommendations, launching of the NHRAP, efforts to resettle IDPs and
progress made in normalising the situation in the country since 2009,
steps taken to rehabilitate and reintegrate child soldiers, efforts to
achieve the MDGs, particularly in the area of poverty reduction, primary
education and child and maternal mortality and the de-mining program
which has cleared over 90% of mined areas.
The Minister said the UPR session was a good ground preparation for
the UN Human Rights Council sessions in March 2013. “The countries were
clearly informed that we had come a long distance”. The Minister
supported by the team replied to the concerns raised by some of the
countries including the US, UK, Canada, the Netherlands, Australia,
Pakistan and China.
The minister in response to a question by the US on the impeachment
motion on the Chief Justice responded that what had been done is
strictly in accordance with the Constitution.
Citing the relevant sections in the Constitution he explained how a
motion can be prepared by the members in Parliament and be presented to
the Speaker and how it will be proceeded by a Select Committee with
representation from both sides of the House.The Secretariat of the Human
Rights Council is currently compiling the outcome report on Sri Lanka
assisted by the Rapporteurs, India, Spain and Benin. Sri Lanka is
interacting with the Secretariat and the Troika. On Monday the report
that will reflect the countries that spoke and their recommendations
will be presented to the Council.
The Minister said Sri Lanka is still considering whether they would
want to make voluntary pledges to the 2012 UPR report. Last year there
were a number of voluntary pledges replacing some of the recommendations
the other States made which Sri Lanka was not ready to accommodate in
toto.
The Minister said the report will be presented to the Council for
Adoption in March and Sri Lanka had time till then to submit voluntary
pledges.
Among the concerns raised included, full implementation of the
recommendations of the LLRC; respecting the independence of the
judiciary, policies and programs to ensure the protection of women and
children and steps to protect the rights of human rights defenders and
journalists. Some of the countries offered recommendations to improve
the situation on the ground, they included: Implementing fully the
recommendations of the LLRC and investigating fully the alleged grave
breaches of international humanitarian law during the conflict,
establishing a central register for all persons missing or in custody
accessible to family members and legal representatives, continuing
efforts to combat impunity in relation to the past conflict and Ensuring
that those responsible for crimes against children, including
recruitment of child soldiers, were brought to justice. According to the
Minister these recommendations are to be accommodated in the final
report if Sri Lankan is agreeable to take them on board.
It will be presented to the Council for adoption in March. Therefore
we have time till March to send amendments on voluntary pledges by the
country.”The outcome report on Sri Lanka prepared by the Troika and the
Secretariat will be presented to the Council on Monday, the Minister
said.
Minister Samarasinghe acknowledged the contribution and commitment
made by the Ambassador in Geneva Ravinatha Aryasingha and the delegates
who were part of his team. The Sri Lankan team from Colombo comprised
six members representing, the Foreign Ministry, Justice Ministry,
Attorney General’s Department and the military. |