Constitutional reform - the panacea for all ills - Rohitha
Bogollagama
by Manjula Fernando
Former Foreign Minister and SLFP organiser for Kotte Rohitha
Bogollagama in an interview with the Sunday Observer said the 13th
Amendment is no sine qua non for all ills for Sri Lanka and the time is
opportune for the country to bring in much-needed constitutional reform.
"Any reform must come within the community. The international
community will come to respect the mandate of any given country. They
will only be concerned in the event it is used either to subjugate,
deny, suppress or destabilize a section of society."
Excerpts of the interview:
With the introduction of the 13th Amendment Sri Lanka managed power
devolution, but the 13th Amendment by itself, has earned the apathy of
the people of the country because it is not something the country wanted
instead it's something that has been forced on us.
From Prime Minister J.R. Jayawardene's administration, R. Premadasa
to the then main opposition party - SLFP, and the JVP outrightly opposed
the 13th Amendment.
However, it has become part and parcel of our Constitution. It went
through because there was force used to get the Jayawardene
administration to yield and with two thirds in hand, the 13th Amendment
it went through. If at that time President Jayawardene did not have a
two thirds majority, we would not have seen the colour of the 13th
Amendment under whatever dictat or force.
There was resistance by President Premadasa, Lalith Athulathmudali,
Gamini Dissanayake and a large section of the then government. But it
was simply steamrolled. That exercise need not be repeated merely
because there are concerns expressed by outside sources.
We have to evaluate that after 25 years since it became part and
parcel of our Constitution, people's impressions and sentiments have
been much to the contrary of the purpose of the 13th Amendment.
Can we use the 13th Amendment as a vehicle towards addressing
problems of the North and East for which it was introduced? At the time
India thought it best that its introduction will address the needs of
security and integration of all communities in Sri Lanka by devolving
power within the ambit of the 13th Amendment.
But it has not been accepted by a larger section of the people as now
seen from the sentiments expressed including that of the TNA.
Therefore I think the time is opportune for us to work towards an
indigenous system of integrating our society, thereby we should bring in
constitutional reform that can address the fundamental core aspirations
of our people for greater integration, security, trust, confidence and
the economic advancement of our nation.
If one thinks that the 13th Amendment is a sine qua non for all ills
of Sri Lanka, that is a big mistake. For twenty five years it has not
proved to be so. It has got the registered name today as a white
elephant.
Why do people call it a white elephant because the amount of money
that has been voted for provincial councils, has not been able to yield
adequate positive results. I am told that Rs. 200 billion it spent
annually in terms of the provincial council administration, out of which
only 15% is spent on capital expenditure.
It is a waste of national resources. In replacing the 13th Amendment,
we have to find alternative measures that can cater to our core needs,
integration of our society, equality for all nationality and economic
advancement of our country.
Therefore we need those to be brought in as our main objective in
replacing the 13th Amendment.
I think the Government should look at constitutional reform. And
President Mahinda Rajapaksa is best suited for that. He has the
leadership to offer the needed reforms.
Repeatedly the Government had been looking at various options and
alternatives. And one such option I could suggest is to have District
Development level Councils and use the local government agencies in the
country to strengthen their administrative framework and devolve more
power for administrative work so that each of those units become a
viable, and productive unit, catering to the basic and continuing needs
of our society at the periphery.
Then you have the district council without making a heavily loaded
political assembly, you can have a district level minister who can guide
the envelopment agenda at the district level with administrative
secretaries or district secretaries.
At the centre you must have a 'bicameral system' where you have a
Senate that can look at the regional representation further strengthened
at the centre, where the rights of all communities can be protected and
equality administered.
There are a lot of systems currently working in the world where we
could get ideas. If you take the extreme European system, like the
Swiss, at the grassroots level there is devolution. If you take the
bigger countries like India, at a different level there is devolution.
In India you have the Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha, In Japan a Senate
and the Parliament, in Australia you have the House of Lords and
Parliament, In UK you have the Upper House and the House of Lords, in
Canada you have the Senate and in US a Senate and the House of
Representatives.
All these countries have different races, varying districts,
provinces but they have at the Centre a very unified national agenda
being maintained, for an integrated society. What we too need is
integration not segregation.
The Government must have the mandate of the people. Any reform must
come within the community. The international community will come to
respect the mandate of any given country.
They will only be concerned in the event it is used either to
subjugate or deny, suppress or destabilize a section of society. But if
you usher the fundamental values of democracy, and fairplay for all
people, no outside force or country can express any dissent and it is
not important. What is needed is a national agenda acceptable to all
people.
The SLMC is a weak policy maker. Their policies change from night to
day. We cannot attach credibility to the concerns they have expressed on
the abolition of 13th Amendment. |