The fall of the Roman Empire:
A great mystery of history
by Nagalingam Kumarakuruparan
Why Rome fell remains one of the greatest mysteries of history.
Historian Edward Gibbon attempts to tell this story in his monumental
work, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. It is considered as one
of the greatest works of history. Gibbon believed that it was his
destiny to be a historian and to chronicle the theme of Rome's fall.
The evidence about the ancient Rome is of two main types. First,
objects which have been left by its ancestors. They are usually
described as archaeological evidence. Secondly, there are the written
records of the ancient civilisation.
He admired the achievements of the Roman Empire at its height. The
imagery of ancient Rome has frequently been invoked by more recent
states for its association with the ultimate heights both of power and
civilisation. It also serves as a warning to humanity. The emperors who
built the great monuments and waged wars, all died like other human
beings. Eventually their empire also came to an end.
Tiber valley
Archaeologists believe that the ancestors of the Romans moved into
the fertile Tiber valley from the North-East about 1000 BC. They and
other groups spoke the language which was later to develop into Latin.
According to Roman legend Romulus and Remus founded Rome in 753 BC.
From then until 509 BC the Romans lived under the rule of Etruscan kings
and then in 509 BC the Romans expelled the much hated ‘Etruscan king
Tarquin the Proud’ from the city and established the Roman Republic. The
Etruscans were the strongest and most civilised people in Northern
Italy. They controlled Rome for two or three generations during which
time the town grew fast as a trading centre. The Etruscan power began to
decline between 520 BC and 500 BC.
Between 509 BC and 264 BC Rome became the most powerful city in
Italy.
In the years that followed the Roman power expanded throughout the
Italian peninsula. During Julius Caesar's time Rome was a well
established empire with overseas colonies. The Roman Empire was so large
– No other power has ever controlled all the lands around the
Mediterranian.
A powerful army was the key to the success. The Romans were able to
translate military success into political and diplomatic security. They
proved generous victors. They shared with other Italian cities political
power and degrees of citizenship. The Romans summed up their political
existense in a single phrase, ‘The Roman Senate and the People'.
Challenges
The real genius of the Romans lay in the fields of politics and law.
They realistically met challenges and created institutions, magistracies
and legal concepts to deal with practical problems. Moreover, the Roman
Constitution was not a single written document but a set of traditional
beliefs, customs and laws. The greatest institution of the Republic was
the Senate, a council of noble elders who advised the king. The Senate
advised the Consuls (Chief Magistrate or Protector) and other
Magistrates because the Senate sat year after year, while Magistrates
changed annually, providing stability and continuity. It also served as
a reservoir of experience and knowledge.
Technically, the Senate could not pass legislation, it could only
offer its advice. Because of the Senate's prestige its advice had the
force of law.
Romans created several assemblies through which the people elected
Magistrates and passed legislation.
Law
The development of law was one of the Romans most splendid
achievements. Roman Law began as a set of rules that regulated the lives
and relations of citizens. The spirit of the Law aimed at protecting the
property, lives and reputations of citizens; redressing wrongs and
giving satisfaction to victims of injustice. During the overseas
conquests the Romans came into more frequent contact with foreigners.
They had to devise laws to deal with disputes between Romans and
foreigners and among foreigners living under the Roman jurisdiction.
Another important aspect of early Roman history was a great social
conflict, usually known as the ‘struggle of the orders’, which developed
between Patricians (Nobles) and Plebians (Commoners). What the Plebians
wanted was real political representation and safeguards against
Patrician domination.
The Plebians’ efforts to gain recognition of their rights are the
crux of the struggle of the orders. The struggle of the orders resulted
in a Rome stronger and better united than before. It could have led to
class warfare and anarchy, but again certain Roman traits triumphed. The
values fostered by their social structure predisposed the Romans to
compromise. Important, too, were Roman patience, tenacity, and a healthy
sense of the practical. These qualities enabled both sides to keep
working until they had resolved the crisis.
The struggle of the orders ended in 287 BC with the new concept of
Roman citizenship. All citizens shared equally under the law.
Theoretically, all could aspire to the highest political offices.
Patrician or Plebian, rich or poor, Roman citizenship was equal for all.
The Roman Empire is often seen as very modern and highly
sophisticated. No other State would construct such a massive network of
all-weather roads until the 19th century and in many countries such
roads would not be built until the 20th century.
Collosseum
Spectacular monuments-the collosseum and pantheon in Rome as well as
theatres, aqueducts, villas and road dotted throughout the provinces.
This makes Rome's fall all the more remarkable. Its fall is memorable
because its empire lasted for so long, moreover governing Rome was not
an easy task.
There had been many serious disagreements over how Rome should be
governed since the Republic had been set up. On the one hand was the
Senate representing the nobility, on the other the Assembly which spoke
for the ordinary people.
Bureaucracy and regulation continued to grow apace, while the basic
efficiency of institutions declined. Rome also had its golden era.
Edward Gibbon, said the 100 year's leading to the death of Emperor
Marcus Aurelius in AD 180 ‘The period in history of the world during
which the condition of the human race was most happy and prosperous'.
When Commodus succeeded his father Marlus Aurelius as Emperor in AD
180 it was the beginning of 100 years of bad government. The main
interests of Commodus were circus and lion baiting. According to Dio
Cassius who lived at the same time, he was a greater curse to the Romans
than any epidemic or crime.’After 12 years of incapable yet cruel rule
he was assassinated. He was followed by many other wicked or weak
emperors.
They were usually chosen by the army. Julianus who succeeded
Commodus, did so simply because he offered more money per soldier than
his rival. The importance of the bureaucrats and soldiers well
understood by Serverus, who got rid of Julianus and made himself
Emperor. Between AD 235 and AD 285 there were more than 20 Emperors.
They reigned on average two-and-a-half years and almost all died
violently.
Many people feel that they can see clear similarities between ancient
Rome and modern world. Gibbon acknowledged that Britain and countries
across the channel all owed their origins to the various Barbarian
groups that had carved up the Roman Empire.
Many states have been compared to the Roman Empire. Not long ago the
most natural comparison would have been with Britain, and nowadays, it
is with the United States of America. Any close look at the Roman Empire
will soon reveal massive differences with any modern state. Gibbon's
work is about the collapse of the Roman Empire, which vanished in the
West and East. His aim is to understand the history on its own terms and
in its own context. |