Typhoon Haiyan roars through Warsaw climate crisis summit
Typhoon Haiyan heightened calls to urgently tackle climate change
and its adverse effects.
Typhoon Haiyan’s trail of devastation in the Philippines prompts
three groups of developing countries to call for climate compensation
scheme to be rolled out. The call came at the 12-day UN Climate Change
Convention’s 19th Conference of the Parties (CoP) that began on November
11, 2013 in Poland's capital Warsaw.
The typhoon devastated Philippines dominated the first day of the
Warsaw climate crisis meeting as the country started to count the human
cost of one of the most destructive typhoons on record.
Though no major decisions are expected at the conference, the level
of progress could be an indicator of the world's chances of reaching a
deal in 2015, which is the new landmark year in the UN-led process after
a 2009 summit in Copenhagen ended in discord.
In an emotional speech the lead climate change envoy of the
Philippines Yeb Sano said he would fast until he saw a sign of real
ambition at the negotiations.
He said the violence of the tropical storm demonstrated the need for
a climate compensation mechanism, which could help countries affected by
extreme weather events.
“Developed country emissions reductions targets are dangerously low
and must be raised immediately, but even if they were in line with the
demand of reducing 40-50 percent below 1990 levels, we would still have
locked-in climate change and would still need to address the issue of
loss and damage,” he said.
Yeb Sano said: “We can stop this madness. Right here in Warsaw. “It
is not natural when people continue to struggle to eradicate poverty and
pursue development and gets battered by the onslaught of a monster storm
now considered as the strongest storm ever to hit land.
It is not natural when science already tells us that global warming
will induce more intense storms. It is not natural when the human
species has already profoundly changed the climate.
Poorest people
“Disasters are never natural. They are the intersection of factors
other than physical. They are the accumulation of the constant breach of
economic, social, and environmental thresholds. Most of the time
disasters is a result of inequity and the poorest people of the world
are at greatest risk because of their vulnerability and decades of
maldevelopment, which I must assert is connected to the kind of pursuit
of economic growth that dominates the world; the same kind of pursuit of
so-called economic growth and unsustainable consumption that has altered
the climate system.
“This process under the UNFCCC has been called many names. It has
been called a farce. It has been called an annual carbon-intensive
gathering of useless frequent flyers. It has been called many names. But
it has also been called the Project to save the planet. It has been
called “saving tomorrow today”. We can fix this. We can stop this
madness. Right now. Right here, in the middle of this football field.
“Can humanity rise to the occasion? I still believe we can.” Sano’s
words were echoed throughout the opening ceremony. Following Sano’s
intervention, three groups representing just over half of the countries
involved in the CoP issued a call for immediate talks on the development
of a loss and damage mechanism.
The G77 + China, Least Developed Countries and Alliance of Small
Island States said this was now a priority for their members in the wake
of the Philippines disaster.
“It’s unacceptable that some continue to sideline this issue, or fob
it off as a ‘research agenda’ item,” said G77 lead negotiator Juan
Hoffmaister.
Negotiators will face a host of recurring stumbling blocks, including
money to help poor countries convert to cleaner energy sources and adapt
to a shifting climate that may lead to disruptions of agriculture and
drinking water, and the spread of diseases.
Developed nations, who fear being landed with bills running into
hundreds of billions, indicated they were willing to discuss a
‘mechanism’, but would not be drawn on what its powers could be.
The USA’s deputy climate negotiator Trigg Talley told a press
conference there were “technical and political” challenges to accepting
any form of compensation scheme, suggesting they would consider a
process that “takes advantage of current institutional infrastructure
and allows countries to understand how to minimise risks linked to loss
and damage.”
There are fears among some parties that a heavy focus on climate
compensation in Warsaw could come at the expense of other aims, notably
agreeing financial targets and a roadmap for a 2015 climate deal.
UN climate chief Christiana Figueres urged countries to clarify the
levels of finance available to drive low carbon development.
Japan and Sweden are set to reveal new climate finance pledges this
week, but there remains a substantial gap between what developing
countries say they need to adapt to climate change and what has been
delivered.
Lasting legacies
Addressing loss and damage, and progressing with a mechanism to make
such payments operational, has potential to be one of the “lasting
legacies” of the Warsaw conference, said the delegate from Nepal,
representing the Least Developed Countries group, who face some of the
worst impacts of climate change. He adds that there is still the
opportunity to halt global warming at 1.5C, although this opportunity is
fading fast.
The Alliance of Small Island States representative also pushed for an
ambitious approach to the negotiations.
Panama, speaking on behalf of the System for Central America
Integration group, said that although their region is one of the most
vulnerable, they are already using their “scanty resources” to make a
difference.
Saudi Arabia, on the other hand, speaking on behalf of the Arab
Group, steered its presentation away from talk of legally binding
targets, focusing on the need for voluntary commitments from developing
countries, which should be supported by developed countries.Despite
being the second largest oil producer in the world, Saudi Arabia is
still counted as a developing country by the UN’s climate body.
It has a history of trying to block ambitious action on climate
change, intervening in discussions taking place last May to say that
tough mitigation targets would be “highly political” and leave a “bad
taste.
Climate deal must be “tailored” to fit USA and China Mat Hope writes
in Carbon Brief: Sixteen years ago in 1997, 192 countries signed an
agreement to cut their greenhouse gas emissions, but the Kyoto Protocol
was hamstrung from the start, because it failed to get the backing of
two major emitters.
It’s clear that new negotiations will need to be tailored towards the
demands of the US and China if a deal is to be struck.
- Third World Network Features
|