Changing growth trends carry new spillover risks - IMF survey
As the global economy shifts from crisis to recovery mode, the
changing growth patterns --- with advanced economies generally
recovering and emerging markets slowing on a broad basis - carry new
spillover risks, the IMF staff report said.
The 2014 Spillover Report, which assesses the impact of policy
actions in one country on others (spillovers) and the possible
consequences for the original spillover source economies themselves
(spillbacks), analyses the implications of two key trends.
First, interest rates are expected to rise as some major advanced
economies begin to unwind their extraordinary stimulus as recovery takes
hold. With policy rates near zero and large Central Bank balance sheets,
these Central Banks face complex challenges in achieving a smooth
unwinding, the IMF staff report said.
Yet, with recovery uneven across countries --- faster in the United
States and the United Kingdom than in the euro area and Japan ---
normalisation will be 'asynchronous', that is, proceed at different
times. This has possible spillovers implications.
Second, emerging market economies are slowing in a synchronised and
protracted manner, and average emerging market GDP growth is projected
to decline from 7 percent during the pre-crisis period (2003-2008) to 5
percent over the next five years. This trend carries sizable spillovers
to the rest of the world through trade and finance, and also has
substantial influence on other emerging markets and developing economies
through 'neighbourhood' effects.
These two risks could intersect and interact with each other, the
report said.
"Markets may reassess growth prospects in emerging markets if there
are renewed bouts of financial turbulence as advanced economies
normalise monetary policy," said Hamid Faruqee, chair of the task force,
which produced the report.
Such a reassessment by markets could, in turn, generate further
stress, he said.
One of the downside scenarios, according to the report, is that
tighter financial conditions combined with further weakening of emerging
market growth could lower global output by as much as 2 percent.
Not all spillovers are negative, said the IMF staff report, which
said that the reason why financial conditions tighten plays a key role
in determining the spillover effects. When advanced economies normalise
monetary policy as their economic outlook improves, interest rates (and
thus global yields) will rise.
While this will tighten financial conditions across the globe, the
accompanying boost to growth should potentially offset any negative
spillovers resulting from the higher interest rates. In other words,
faster growth in advanced economies - which translates into higher
external demand - could be good for other economies, if managed well.
On the other hand, if the tightening of monetary conditions is not
driven by higher growth but is instead triggered by, for example,
financial stability concerns, spillovers could have a negative impact on
growth elsewhere, especially in vulnerable emerging economies.
Similarly, asynchronous adjustment in advanced economies --- for
instance, continued easing in the euro area and Japan and tightening in
the United States and the United Kingdom --- may result in larger swings
in exchange rates of major currencies, potentially causing problems for
economies with balance sheet vulnerabilities and foreign exchange
exposures.
In terms of impact, spillovers from monetary policy normalisation in
advanced economies will likely differ across countries. Past experience
suggests that those with relatively strong fundamentals --- that is,
lower inflation, higher current account balances and reserves and deeper
financial markets --- can better minimise spillovers from higher
interest rates abroad.
The staff report said that the effects from global shocks are milder
in these economies, and credibility gives them more policy space to
respond to the shock itself.
While growth in some advanced economies is rebounding, emerging
markets are slowing down on a synchronised basis from their highs before
the crisis. Here, growth is expected to be below post-crisis rates and
longer-term historical averages over the next five years.
"Two features stand out when comparing the current slowdown with
other such episodes: medium-term forecasts have been revised down
continuously since 2010, and a slowdown in productivity is more visible
this time around," said Faruqee.
"The slowdown thus appears to have a large structural component," he
said.
Given the significant and rising contribution of these economies to
the global economy over the past few decades, such a protracted slowdown
will weigh on global growth through trade and finance channels.
The report estimates that a one percent slowdown in emerging
economies lowers growth in advanced economies by 1/4 percentage point,
on average.
Other important channels where slower emerging market growth could
carry spillovers include through global commodity markets and through
banks exposed to emerging market borrowers.
The staff report also highlighted local spillovers from emerging
markets to other emerging and low-income countries, or the 'neighbourhood'
effect. For example, a slowdown in China and Brazil would impact
emerging Asia and Southern Cone countries, through trade.
Russia would have an impact on its neighbours through remittances,
while Venezuela would affect its neighbours via potential changes in the
provision of favourable financing through energy cooperation agreements.
Geopolitical tensions in Russia and Ukraine could spill over to other
parts of the world, from major disruptions in production or
transportation of natural gas or crude oil. |