Let religion and philosophy co-exist
There have been numerous philosophers and philosophies since the
pre-Socratic era. We have discussed many philosophies in these columns
only to show that no philosophy is foolproof or valid for all times.
What Socrates taught his pupils have been challenged by later
generations. Aristotle differed from the philosophical views held by his
guru Plato. It is the nature of philosophy. Certain philosophical truths
are in vogue and valid only for a limited time. Like everything else in
the world, philosophical ideas are also subject to change from time to
time.
The position of religious truths appears to be quite different. What
the Buddha, Jesus Christ or Prophet Mohammed taught some millennia ago
remain true even today. In such a scenario, is there a necessity for
people to indulge in Philosophy? The answers may differ from person to
person. However, the fact remains that philosophers will be born in
every age and they will have a following as well.
The curiosities of Western philosophy are endless. A survey of the
debates between philosophers and religious leaders, mainly in the
Western world, shows that no system of philosophy is perfect. At the
beginning Absolute Idealism was thought to be a comprehensive system of
philosophy.
However, after some time it proved to be defective. Yet, down the
centuries, philosophers never hesitated to come up with novel theories
about life and the universe. Then people flock to them thinking that
their theories would unlock every door.
Rationalists
But this never happens. What happens in philosophy is that someone
stumbles upon something that has long been ignored by others. For
instance, the Rationalists of the 17th century promoted clear thinking
through rational demonstration.

Philosophers believe that religious laws are necessary
political arts.
- Averroes |
Two centuries later the Idealists veered away from it and felt the
need to relate the whole experience to an ultimate spiritual cause.
Soren Kierkegaard exposed the falsity of theories expressed by the
Idealists.
Simply because philosophy is something that is always challenged by
later generations, it does not render itself a useless subject. On the
contrary, we have learnt many great philosophical ideas and we have
become critical thinkers over the years. Just as there is no single
person, except the Buddha or God who knows everything, no philosophy is
all-embracing. The philosophical theories and approaches are tentative
and provisional. By exposing ourselves to philosophical ideas, we become
wiser.
Ibn Rushd, popularly known in Europe as Averroes, was a rare
philosopher who tried to reconcile religious and philosophical truths.
He thought that only educated people are capable of thinking
philosophically and that remains true even today. He said the Holy
Qur’an provided a poetic approximation of the truth as far as the
universe was concerned.
This was something intelligible to the people. However, he said that
highly educated people had a religious obligation to use philosophical
reasoning. In essence, he believed that philosophy and religion are not
incompatible.
Unorthodox
Averroes was interested in Aristotle’s philosophy and he paraphrased
some of the latter’s work. His unorthodox philosophy did not appeal to
the public. As a result, his books were banned and he exiled himself in
1195.
Although he was shunned by his fellow Muslims, his works have been
translated into Hebrew and Latin. The translations influenced Jewish and
Latin scholars who accepted Aristotle as interpreted by Averroes as the
truth according to reason.
Colin Brown in Philosophy and the Christian Faith has warned people
to be on their guard against aligning Christianity too closely with any
one particular philosophy. However, some thinkers find it fashionable to
reinterpret Christianity in the light of philosophy.
One of the great values of secular philosophy is the stimulus it
gives to religious thinkers to rethink their position. The wisest course
of action is to take a cool, hard look at every new trend in philosophy
and evaluate it in the light of our experience and faith. In such a
situation religion and philosophy will co-exist in harmony.
|