Casteism: the fishermen's dividing line
by a Special Correspondent
Rising casteism is threatening the unity of Tamil Nadu fishermen - a
division which could affect their bargaining power vis-a-vis North Sri
Lankan fishermen in the never ending dispute over fishing rights in the
Palk Strait and Palk Bay.
 |
Rising
casteism threatening unity of Tamil Nadu fishermen
pic: courtesy imgkid.com |
 |
‘Futile to
divide Tamil Nadu fishermen on caste lines’
pic: courtesy nagapatinam.tn |
Though the term 'caste' is avoided to be politically correct in a
State which is wedded to the egalitarian Dravidian ideology, it has been
brought in by the backdoor through the concepts of 'traditional' and
'non-traditional' fishermen.
By 'traditional fishermen' it is meant fishermen from the traditional
fishing castes, and the term 'non-traditional fishermen' refers to those
who are drawn from other castes.
The distinction between traditional fishermen and non-traditional
fishermen has been revived or reintroduced by M.Ilango, a former member
of the Puducherry (Pondicherry) Legislative Assembly and the current
President of the National Fishworkers' Forum (NFF). In a statement on
the allegation that Tamil Nadu fishermen are smuggling drugs into Sri
Lanka, made by a popular Tamil Nadu daily *Dinamalar* and the Indian
Coast Guard in a case before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court,
Ilango said that this charge must be investigated by the Central and
Tamil Nadu governments and the 'fair name' and innocence of Tamil Nadu's
traditional fishing communities should be established.
He later told a Chennai-based English language daily that
'traditional fishermen' would not indulge in smuggling but
'non-traditional fishermen' could, because of differing value systems.
The issue of drug smuggling camp up when *Dinamalar * said that as
per reports from Jaffna, the six-man Indian fishermen's delegation which
met Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena in Colombo on May 12, had
a smuggler in it. Ilango indirectly gave credence to this charge when he
said
that the delegation was led not by traditional fishermen, but by
non-traditional fishermen.
He pointed out that N.Devadas and B.Yesuraj, who led the delegation,
are non-traditional fishermen drawn from other castes.
They are Thevars. He also pointed out that S.P.Anthonymuthu, Advisor
to the Indo-Lanka Fishermen's Welfare Forum, who took the fishermen to
President Sirisena, does not belong to a fishing caste.
Ilango's suspicion is that leaders from other castes may have other
interests and may not represent the fishermen's interest faithfully or
may use the fishermen for their own ends, political and non-political.
Answering this charge, Yesuraj told the media that it is regrettable
that the Tamil Nadu media and a fellow fishermen's leader should cast
aspersions and ignore the singular achievement of meeting the Sri Lankan
President informally and getting 37 Tamil Nadu fishermen released.
"President Sirisena had urged the resumption of talks between
fishermen's associations and we are confident that the fourth round will
be held," Ilango said.
"We see an end to the entire problem," Devadas added. "The allegation
that we took a smuggler with us to the negotiating table is made by
anti-social elements who want to break the unity of fishermen. We could
not have taken a smuggler as we went with the knowledge of the Indian
and Tamil Nadu governments and with valid visas," Yesuraj said.
Caste configuration
Explaining the caste configuration, Consultant to the South Indian
Federation of Fishermen's Societies, V. Vivekanandan, said that while
fishermen in Nagapattinam and Karaikal (Puducherry) areas belong to
traditional fishing castes like Paravar and Mukkuvar, those in
Rameswaram are from the Thevar group of non-fishing castes.
Vanniars have also entered fishing, he pointed out. While Ilango
belongs to a fishing caste, Devadas and Yesuraj belong to one of the
Thevar castes, which are mainly agricultural. Vivekanandan argued that
in this day and age, it is futile to divide Tamil Nadu fishermen on
caste lines because over the years, due to the introduction of
mechanized boats and trawlers in the 1970s, fishing has become a highly
profitable commercial activity attracting people from various castes and
communities. These days, both boat owners and fish workers (who go out
to sea) are drawn from a variety of castes.
One-upmanship
Asked why casteism has raised its head now, Vivekanandan said that it
is a product of 'one-upmanship' developing in a field which has become a
political playground.
People like Ilango resent that Devadas, Yesuraj and Anthonymuthu had
got together and had unofficially met President Sirisena to get the 37
fishermen released.
And the 37 happen to be from the Nagapattinam-Karaikal area, Ilango's
home turf. Yesuraj and Devadas said that they did not go to Sri Lanka to
meet President Sirisena but to attend the ceremonial induction of
Anthonymuthu's son into the priesthood.
When Anthonymuthu casually said that he could arrange a courtesy call
on President Sirisena through his links with Ministers D.M.Swaminathan
and Mahinda Amaraweera, the guests from Tamil Nadu agreed. At the
informal meeting, to their amazement, the President accepted their
request to release the fishermen. In fact, he released them within a few
days. But Ilango pooh poohed this achievement, saying that fishermen had
been released by Sri Lankan Presidents earlier too. There was nothing to
coo about in the release of the thirty seven men now, he said.
Vivekanandan said that there had been one-upmanship on the part of
Anthonymuthu, if not Devadas and Yesuraj. In fact, his one-upmanship is
resented by North Sri Lankan fishermen too. K.Rajachandran, President of
the Ambal Fishermen's Cooperative of Karainagar in Jaffna, doubted if
Anthonymuthu really represents fishermen. He is seen as a person trying
to build a political career using the fishermen's issue without being a
fishermen himself. Rajachandran even declared that North Sri Lankan
fishermen will not participate in meetings in which non-fishermen
represent real fishermen. |