Playing God
Genetic
engineering has become a generic term for altering the existing gene
structure of any living organism. Attempts are even being made to
genetically revive extinct species such as mammoths through this
process. However, there still are many ethical and moral considerations
that should be taken into account when deciding to alter the genetic
sequence (genome) of any living organism. This is even more crucial when
the species in question happens to be Homo sapiens.
Scientists around the world are working with the human genome
possibly with one aim in mind - to ‘make’ better humans.What if you
could identify a potentially life threatening disease in an embryo and
remove it through a genetic process? What if you could end blindness and
deafness, at least when they are genetically inherited? What if you
could cure deadly diseases in children and adults though a bit of
genetic engineering? And what about that ultimate quest – immortality?
And we are yet to come to the most controversial topic of all - human
cloning. And last but not least, how do you work with embryos? When
exactly do embryos get a ‘life’?
Now scientists and governments want to make things a bit clearer as
research in this area has intensified with no apparent rules guiding the
process. This should ideally be a universal exercise where the rules are
applicable to all scientists and research centres around the world so
that humanity benefits in the end without any disastrous consequences
for the future survival of our species.
Genome

Pic courtesy: ZenGardner.com |
We are informed that as issues regarding the altering of humans
continue to rise, scientists in the USA and elsewhere will be working
together to settle on a set of ethical guidelines about the principles
of altering the human genome. The disturbing revelation that researchers
in China had successfully altered genes within human embryos in April
prompted the action. A group of scientists led by Junjiu Huang, a
researcher in genetics at Sun Yat-sen University in Guangzhou, used
non-viable embryos, which cannot result in a live birth, that were
obtained from fertility clinics. They managed to inject embryos with an
enzyme that can be programmed to target a specific gene. The team
attempted to modify the gene responsible for ?-thalassaemia, a
potentially fatal blood disorder, using a gene-editing technique known
as CRISPR/Cas9. Researchers at the Alliance for Regenerative Medicine
and other scientists around the world have called to stop such
controversial experiments. “Given the significant safety and ethical
implications of modifying the DNA of human reproductive (germline)
cells, this research is highly premature,” the Alliance said in a
statement to AFP. Of course, there are scientists and governments who
disagree with this view. They say that some of the diseases that could
eventually be cured by this technique are far more dangerous and
distressing than genetic mutations in an embryo that was never going to
develop anyway. In theory, genetic editing can rid humanity of
sickle-cell disease, haemophilia and a host of less well-known diseases.
Summit
In the light of this incident, scientists are planning to hold an
international summit to raise awareness on the subject and formulate a
set of guidelines on the genetic modification of the human genome
(called “editing” in scientific jargon) at any stage of life.
Although it appeared that the embryos were incapable of life, it
urged the US National Academy and the National Academy of Medicine to
come up with a rule book which will be regarded scientifically
acceptable in the use of the gene altering system known as the
CRISPR-Cas9 that enables the changing progression of DNA to be taken
from a fertilised ovum. Since 2013, the CRISPR/Cas9 system has been used
for gene editing (adding, disrupting or changing the sequence of
specific genes) and gene regulation in species. It is even possible to
use CRISPR to build RNA-guided gene drives capable of altering the
genomes of entire populations.
The date for a meeting has not yet been known yet a suggestion from
Marcy Darnovsky , the director of the Center for Genetics and Society in
Berkeley, California, that the talk should not only include those with
the technical and specific knowledge of genetics. The meeting should
also involve politicians, religious groups and human rights
organisations who are also part of this fast-approaching field of
possibilities as it literally leads to shape the face of humanity,
Darnovsky says.
Illegal
As many would come to agree internationally, the issue as to when,
what and whose DNA that scientists would be permitted to ‘play god’ will
certainly be respected. The altering of the human embryo is illegal in
many countries but can be performed in most part of the US if the
government is not involved in financing.
The human genome used to be a mystery. Not any longer. And you can
even access it easily. What used to take years now takes months: after
buying a bunch of sequencers in 2014, Sweden’s Uppsala University has
published a human genome sequence under the Creative Commons license.
The data has been posted at Sweden’s Uppsala University’s Website. It’s
not the world’s only open-source human genome project - for example,
there is the ongoing Encode Project, which is also working towards
building “a comprehensive parts list of functional elements in the human
genome”. Thus scientists even in developing countries have access to
this information which was previously restricted.
Technique
New advances are being made in this field all the time. For example,
Scientists at the University of North Carolina say they have developed a
technique for finding where DNA repair happens throughout all of human
DNA. It is a very exciting field which promises much for the human race.
If genetic engineering can eliminate deadly diseases and create perfect
humans, there is nothing wrong about in theory. But it is not so
straightforward - there are many dangers and pitfalls that could
potentially be very damaging to our human race. Better technology may
evolve in the future, but we might have to go slow when it comes to
playing God. |