MR lying low? :
SLFP infighting continues, TNA faces dissent
Sunday Politics with Rasika Jayakody
By taking part in the Sri Lanka Freedom Party’s 64th anniversary
ceremony at President Maithripala Sirisena’s hometown, Polonnaruwa,
former President Mahinda Rajapaksa showed that he is more thick-skinned
than most politicians of his era.
On the one hand, the anniversary ceremony was held in the hometown of
President Sirisena. As if to drive a point home, the organisers invited
as keynote speaker Professor Sarath Wijesuriya, a staunch critic of the
Rajapaksa administration and a key member of the Puravesi Balaya
(Citizens’ Power) organization which backed Sirisena at the last
Presidential election.
By inviting Prof. Wijesuriya to deliver the keynote address at the
event, the SLFP wanted to indicate to its supporters that the party was
repairing its ties with the civil society, which it lost due to the
repressive politics during the past five years of the Rajapaksa
administration.
Rajapaka’s presence at the SLFP anniversary ceremony gave a strong
indication that the former President was attempting to engage in
‘reconciliatory politics’ with President Sirisena. At present, the
former President has no other option but to embrace President Sirisena’s
leadership of the party.
The Rajapaksa family and close associates are keenly aware that they
face a number of investigations on the anti-corruption front. Clearly,
Mahinda believes that reconciliatory politics is the only way-out of the
present crisis.
That was one reason why Rajapaksa, who desperately attempted to
regain his position as the Chairman, UPFA and the SLFP in the run-up to
the recent Parliamentary election, did not seek to become the Opposition
Leader of the new Parliament.
Over 50 UPFA MPs, who gathered at Parliamentarian Prasanna
Ranatunga’s Colombo residence soon after the Parliamentary election,
urged Rajapaksa to accept the Opposition Leader’s post.
However, some advisers close to Rajapaksa warned that accepting the
post of Opposition Leader would only expedite inquiries against
Rajapaksa and his family members. This advice, apparently, encouraged
him to lie low and kept him out of the race from the beginning.
CBK avoids
Former President Rajapaksa gave the first indication of his interest
in ‘reconciliatory politics’ when he took part in the swearing-in
ceremony of Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe. Former President
Chandrika Kumaratunga, a key figure in the anti-Rajapaksa campaign at
the Parliamentary election, did not take part in the event possibly
because she shrank from sitting alongside her one-time successor.
When the SLFP anniversary was held on Wednesday, former President
Kumaratunga was in India, taking part in an international conference.
Therefore, she was saved from having to share the stage with Rajapaksa.
At the SLFP event, Rajapaksa’s seat was next to that of President
Sirisena and the two were seen having a congenial discussion. For a
moment, party supporters forgot the unpleasant exchange of letters
between their past and present leaders ahead of the Parliamentary
election, crippling the UPFA coalition’s campaign during the last stage
of the election.
Former Opposition Leader, Minister Nimal Siripala de Silva, who said
he was ready to give up his Prime Ministerial hopes to make way for
Rajapaksa, sat next to his former leader at the Polonnaruwa event.
In his keynote speech, Prof. Sarath Wijesuriya highlighted some key
issues that the SLFP needed to rectify before facing the next national
level elections.
While acknowledging the service rendered by Rajapaksa during the
final phase of the war, Wijesuriya said the former President’s move to
lift ‘constitutional limitations’ on the executive presidency had a
disastrous impact on the party.
He said it was similar to former Prime Minister Sirimavo
Bandaranaike’s move to extend her term by two years under the
constitution of 1972, plunging the party into the opposition for 17
years.
When Prof. Wijesuriya openly criticized the conduct of the former
President, Rajapaksa looked at President Sirisena, wearing a typical
Cheshire cat smile on his face. The crux of the keynote speech was the
need for transforming the party into a democratic and pluralistic
political movement that cuts across all communities of the country.
During Rajapaksa’s tenure as the party Chairman, the SLFP gravitated
towards an exclusively Sinhala-Buddhist nationalism, alienating almost
all other ethnic and religious communities in the country. That was one
key reason why Rajapaksa lost two national level elections in a row,
within nine months.
President Sirisena, addressing the anniversary ceremony of the SLFP,
made it clear that the party should be subjected to radical
transformation aiming at winning the next elections.
“This is the right time for implementing the necessary and timely
changes for the SLFP.
The SLFP should be subjected to a complete transformation to create a
disciplined and people-friendly party, which will be embraced by all
segments of the people,” the President said. While making this
statement, he also alluded to the reasons leading to the UPFA’s defeat
at the last Parliamentary election.
Highly placed party sources told the Sunday Observer that the SLFP is
designing a restructuring program under President Maithripala Sirisena’s
direction. Under this plan, President Sirisena will visit party
supporters in every district to discuss key problems faced by them.
The SLFP, at this juncture, desperately needs to regain the voter
base which it has lost not to the UNP, but to the coalition partners of
the UPFA. At the recent Parliamentary election, it became crystal clear
that minor stakeholders of the UPFA alliance, including the National
Freedom Front led by Wimal Weerawansa, had penetrated into the
traditional voter base of the SLFP.
For instance, former UPFA General Secretary Susil Premajayantha was
the only ‘original’ SLFPer, who managed to find his way into Parliament
from the Colombo district. All the other UPFA MPs, who got elected to
Parliament from Colombo, were either members of minor parties of the
UPFA or members who crossed over from other parties. This showed that
the SLFP, as a political entity, has lost its strength, despite the
UPFA’s significant ‘share’ in Parliament.
That is one reason why the party is exploring the possibility of
distancing itself from the UPFA coalition in a bid to stand on its own
feet at the forthcoming local government election. Standing alone,
needless to say, is not an easy task for any political party especially
after a defeat at a national level election. However, the majority of
SLFP seniors are of the belief that it is the only way of strengthening
the party for the future.
“Our next target is the local government election. It is a good
opportunity to find young and popular leaders from the grassroots level
who can take the party forward at the next national level election.
Therefore, it is important to identify potential leaders and field them
as contestants at the local government polls.
That is one aspect of the party’s restructuring process,” a senior
Parliamentarian of the SLFP told the Sunday Observer.
Some local government members of the UPFA came under much criticism
over the past few years due to their misconduct. Sampath Vidanapathirana,
the former Chairman of the Tangalle Pradeshiya Sabha, was sentenced to
20 years’ imprisonment last year in connection with the murder of a
British tourist who was enjoying his holiday in Sri Lanka.
Several local government members of the UPFA have been charged with
rape and other criminal activities, clearly showing that the party had
given nomination to the ‘wrong people’ to contest on the UPFA ticket at
the last local government polls. It is important to rectify such errors
as part of the restructuring process.
Opposition Leader race
Apart from the swearing-in ceremony of the new Cabinet on Friday, the
most important development in the political sphere last week was the
appointment of R. Sampanthan as the Leader of the Opposition. A senior
Parliamentarian and a seasoned politician, Sampanthan was unanimously
selected for the position by the Tamil National Alliance which has 16
seats in the new Parliament.
Sampanthan was the first Tamil Opposition leader who represents the
country’s legislature after A. Amirthalingam who held the position in
1977. Amirthalingam and all other TULF MPs boycotted Parliament from the
middle of 1983 for a number of reasons: they were under pressure from
Tamil militants not to stay in Parliament beyond their normal six-year
term; the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka required them
to swear an oath unconditionally renouncing support for a separate
state; and the Black July riots in which up to 3,000 Tamils were
murdered by Sinhalese mobs. After three months of absence, Amirthalingam
forfeited his seat in Parliament on October 22, 1983. Rajavarothiam
Sampanthan was among the 16 MPs who represented Parliament with
Amirthalingam from 1977 to 1983, a tumultuous period in the country’s
political history. Sampanthan represented his hometown, the Trincomalee
electorate, in the 1977 Parliament.
Although he only represented the aspirations of Tamils in the North
and the East in his four-decade-long political career, the TNA Leader is
familiar with the problems of other communities, as he received his
secondary and tertiary education in the ‘South’. Sampanthan, who is five
years younger than Amirthalingam, is often dubbed as the last
personality of the ‘Chelvanayagam era’ in Tamil politics.
After forfeiting his seat, Sampanthan re-entered Parliament as an MP
from Trincomalee after his colleague A. Thangathurai was assassinated by
the LTTE in 1997. He lost his seat at the Parliamentary election in 2000
but managed to re-enter in December, 2001. Over the past 14 years,
Sampanthan has represented the country’s legislature continuously,
despite grave threats to his life. When the LTTE was at the height of
its military power, the TNA, of which Sampanthan was the leader, came
under immense pressure from both sides in the war.
Before naming the Leader of the Opposition, Speaker Karu Jayasuriya
had several rounds of discussions with prominent legal experts with
regard to the legal basis of the appointment.
He also received a letter from Professor Vishwa Warnapala, General
Secretary of the UPFA, that the party did not wish to nominate a member
for the Opposition Leader’s position. When this was announced by the
Speaker, many UPFA MPs of the MR faction got angry and frustrated as
they handed over a letter to the President on Tuesday, requesting to
name Kumara Welgama as the Leader of the Opposition. The letter was
signed by 57 MPs of the UPFA mostly known to be Mahinda loyalists.
Not serious
However, the MPs did not take measures to inform the Speaker that
they wanted to function as an independent group in Parliament and wished
to appoint Kumara Welgama as the Leader of the Opposition. Instead, by
submitting a letter to President Sirisena who had distanced himself from
the process of appointing the Opposition Leader, the UPFA MPs seemed to
have hinted that they were not too serious about their request.
From the Speaker’s perspective, Jayasuriya had to consider several
factors. The UNP and the SLFP, the main constituent of the UPFA, had
just entered into an agreement to work together within the framework of
a national unity government. The Speaker was not in a position to
identify internal factions within political parties when appointing the
Leader of the Opposition.
His only option was to invite the third largest political party in
Parliament to nominate a member for the post.
The third largest political party in the eighth Parliament is the
Tamil National Alliance which has sixteen seats. Therefore, the Speaker
announced the TNA’s nominee, R. Sampanthan, as the Leader of the
Opposition.
The biggest challenge confronting Sampanthan, at present, is to earn
the confidence of Sinhala and Muslim communities in the country.
He will have to transcend ‘ethnic boundaries’ and project himself as
a ‘national leader’ acceptable to all communities in Sri Lanka.
Sampanthan’s appointment also gives a great opportunity for the TNA to
position itself as a national political party that understands the needs
and aspirations of people across the country.
Speaking to BBC Sandeshaya soon after his appointment, Sampanthan
said he would do anything that a Sinhalese Opposition leader would do to
serve the Sinhalese community in the country. He categorically said that
the TNA would not allow any party to divide Sri Lanka and they were not
supportive of ‘separatist policies’. Sampanthan’s statement can be
understood as a move to allay the fears of the Sinhala-speaking
community over his appointment.
Sampanthan fired his first salvo at the government when he criticized
what he termed as the excessive number of ministers in the national
unity government. Raising his objections over the motion, he said the
culture of having an excessive number of ministers must end.
However, he was careful enough not to criticize the move to form a
unity government by the two largest political parties in Parliament and
his opposition was only directed at the ‘excessive’ number of ministers.
“The two main parties working together could be in the national
interest. This is the first time in the country’s history that the two
main parties have decided to come together to constitute a government,”
the TNA Leader said.
Wigneswaran
While the TNA leader and his parliamentarians strive to move towards
national politics, Northern Province Chief Minister C.V. Wigneswaran
seems busy projecting himself as the torch-bearer of hardcore Tamil
nationalism. Tamil political circles were somewhat disconcerted last
week by the US government’s decision to present a motion at the
forthcoming UNHRC session in Geneva backing a domestic inquiry conducted
by the Sri Lankan government.
The Northern Provincial Council last week unanimously adopted a
resolution pushing for an international investigation on alleged war
crimes during the final phase of the war in Sri Lanka. They said only an
international investigation could put Sri Lanka on the path of
‘meaningful reconciliation’.
A part of the resolution adopted by the Northern Provincial Council
is as follows: “This Council wishes to emphasise that Sri Lanka’s
descent into grave human, political and social rights’ violations was
precipitated and reinforced by the failure of key pillars of State which
were meant to protect and serve its citizens. The prolonged decline in
the political culture and political will of the State and the failure of
key institutions of justice, law and order, i.e. judiciary, police and
the armed forces, ensured that impunity became the new norm in Sri
Lanka. The Tamil community bore the full brunt of this new norm at all
levels of its existence.
The prejudice among the members of the Judiciary against the
minorities has been well recorded both by international organizations
such as the International Bar Council and by Sinhalese lawyers such as
Jayantha de Almeida Guneratne, Kishali Pinto Jayawardene and Gehan
Gunatilleke in their publication ‘The Judicial Mind – Responding to the
Protection of Minority Rights’.
Similarly, the International Independent Group of Eminent Persons (IIGEP)
who were nominated by international donor countries and the government
of Sri Lanka and vested with a wide mandate to observe all
investigations and inquiries conducted by and on behalf of the
Commission of Inquiry into 17 atrocities, on resigning, cited reasons
which aptly captured the long history of failures on the part of the
State and the entrenched institutional flaws. The reason cited by IIGEP
included the lack of political will, transparency and timeliness in the
proceedings, non-co-operation of state bodies and lack of victim/witness
protection among other things as reasons for its failure.
For these reasons, the Council calls upon the International community
to set up an international tribunal to try those alleged to have
committed international crimes against the Tamils in Sri Lanka.
We urge the new leaders of the Sri Lankan government to be courageous
enough to work with the International community to set up a credible
international mechanism which will deliver justice and put this nation
on a path of meaningful reconciliation.”
Parallel to the resolution, a signature campaign was launched in
Jaffna on Friday calling for an international accountability mechanism
to examine what they termed as mass atrocities committed during the
final stages of Sri Lanka’s armed conflict.
Representatives from the Tamil National Alliance, Tamil National
People’s Front, Religious leaders, civil society representatives, Jaffna
University lecturers and students took part in the campaign and the
signatures were collected by activists at the Jaffna Central bus station
and other places.
These developments indicate that the present political situation has
compelled the Tamil National Alliance to focus on two battlefronts - in
the North and in the South. While Opposition Leader Sampanthan will lead
the battle in the South, former Supreme Court Judge and NPC Chief
Minister Wigneswaran, who remained ‘neutral’ at the last Parliamentary
election, will lead the battle in the North. |