An Evening of Short Plays:
Food for thought as a social critique
by Dilshan Boange
A few months ago the 'Keti Naatya Sandyavak' (An Evening of Short
Plays) unfolded on the boards at the Lionel Wendt with four Sinhala
short plays written by Praneeth Chanaka Muramudali and Sanjeewa
Pathirage. They were brought to life as a production by creative
director extraordinaire, veteran theatre practitioner, Jerome L. de
Silva.
What can be said as noteworthy about the show was how it was
presented with a 'creative investment' to be a 'production' that
intended to give viewers more than their money's worth. It was in that
sense 'theatre' that offered some serious food for thought as a social
critique, while not bereft of the ingredients which mark a production as
one seeking to 'entertain' its audience.
The
four short plays were titled 'Jananige maranaya' (Janani's death), 'Yakku
kelambei' (The devils are stirred up), 'Mang athulata ennada? (May I
come in?) and Ethule yuddayak, (A war within). The first three were
written by Muramudali and the last by Pathirage. Each short play had a
different theme and setting. The first was in the strict confines of a
household where the sole duty of attending to an invalid mother had
fallen on the youngest child who seeks his own liberation from the
predicament he is in through perhaps the eventual demise of the mother.
How the different members of the family each have their individual goals
and aspirations as well as their frustrations and anxieties while being
conscious of their family bonds and responsibilities is brought out
while dealing with how the hierarchism of the household can be
oppressive in the name of filial, fraternal, and familial duties.
The story is a bold one and was brought out well with interplay
between dramatic expression of emotions and driving the story through
dialogue.
Dark humour
What unfolded in 'Yakku Kalambei' was a story that had dark humour
bound to strings of hilarity to touch the pulse of the Sri Lankan
theatre goer. The stagecraft devised for this play displayed a narrative
technique that was innovative and theatrically stimulating. Hunger and
starvation can drive people to the brink of madness, and insanity
becomes an internalised lodger that resists eviction. There is no
barrier of age when it comes to what hunger can drive people to do. The
two youths beleaguered by penury and persisting hunger represent in one
respect, a segment of the young generation that refuses to be manual
labourers to at least earn a meal, and may instead opt to 'qualify' for
prison so that they may at least 'escape starvation'.
The third play brought out a question pertinent to the present times.
What is the worth of education today? Education today in our country has
become a commercialised industry and relies to an extent on mass media
to be validated for its value. The television industry today by creating
endlessly diversified strains of 'reality shows' that are actually
highly controlled sensationalised talent competitions, misleads an
entire generation of youngsters. The
playwright has very perceptively caught onto how these two sectors
-'education' and 'television' as industrialised, crassly commercialised
spheres of business should be exposed for the duping they do to an
entire gullible generation of youngsters.
The creative direction of the director must be applauded for how the
stage and its physical space together with lighting and sounds were used
to create the scenario of the 'Refund Star', a reality game show that
became the ruse to decide whether in fact the student who demanded a
refund of the money he spent to 'earn' a degree really 'qualifies' for a
refund. A very heady topic that critiques the times we live in.
Price of liberation
The final play was one that had war, and the 'price of liberation' as
its theme. Not related to the separatist war that waged in our own
country, but set in something of an eastern European geographical
setting, the story nevertheless rang out a strong message about what
violence begets and how 'love' and 'sex' in times of war play out
between victors and victims. War, in some respects is all about the
prevalence of the will of a power hierarchy, and really having nothing
to do with winning justice
for the oppressed, is perhaps one of the propositions the play sought
to make.
Many years ago, during my undergrad days in Colombo varsity, I
watched Dhananjaya Karunaratne's 'Sihina Rangahala' at the Elphinstone
theatre.
That was my first experience of watching a collection of short plays
put on the boards as a 'theatre show'. While Sinhala theatre is
considerably much wider spread and robust in terms of the volume of
viewership in the island compared to English theatre, there is
surprisingly few attempts by mainstream Sinhala theatre practitioners
and drama producers to put on collections of short plays as shows. I
wonder if the genre of the short play has yet been assiduously explored
for viability among Sinhala theatregoers. The value of these kinds of
shows is that more than one playwright, director, would get to present
their works to audiences.
The lights, the costumes, the level of acting talent on stage, all
indicated that a commendable degree of effort had been behind Keti
Naatya Sandyavak, and therefore The Workshop Players and its captain
-Jerome L. de Silva should be lauded for putting on a production that
hopefully will encourage more shows of this nature to come alive on
stage in the future to enable short plays scripted on paper to gain
colour, form, flesh and motion as 'theatre'. |