A concentrated effort to: Deny and destroy diversity
by Sanjana Hattotuwa
Sinha-le, a campaign primarily promoted over social media both in Sri
Lanka and abroad, can also be seen on stickers adorning three-wheelers
and other vehicles. The campaign is essentially racist, mixing elements
of violent xenophobia, Islamophobia, racial slurs and hate speech in
what is promoted as a campaign signifying love for country and patriotic
zeal.
Perusing
through a Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/groups/536506036516951/)
group, one of many others, established in support of the campaign, one
encounters outrageous content of a nature the careful observer will
immediately recognise as exactly what was promoted by similar pages,
groups and sites aligned with the Bodu Bala Sena (BBS). Fringe lunacy
has a place in a democracy, as precisely that.
The danger under the previous government was that extremists, like
the BBS, were allowed the space to thrive and operate in conditions of
near total impunity. In comparison, the Sinha-le movement is as yet
nascent. Aside from inspiring one act of vandalism, it has yet to grow
into the monstrosity that was the BBS and other chauvinistic forces
aligned to it, especially online. The enduring danger is that Sinha-le
and similar movements that crop up in the months ahead are black swan
events - spontaneous mechanisms created to instigate communal unrest
over a specific instance, individual or location, but go viral and
develop a life of their own, ending up by spilling over into violence in
the real world. Not unlike the appeal of the Islamic State (ISIL)
through online social media, the racism, intolerance and violence of
Sinha-le is rendered invisible to its vocal proponents.
The fans and followers create echo chambers, where radicalisation is
fostered by the production, publication, dissemination and discussion of
deeply racist material. Almost exclusively in Sinhala, this content
passes under the radar of platforms like Facebook and policies in place
against content that instigates communal violence, racism and hate
speech. The catch-22 is around how best to respond to Sinha-le.
Also using social media and in Sinhala, the pushback has been very
creative, sardonic, significant and widespread. It is unclear however
the degree to which the more liberal, progressive and democratic voices
are able to infiltrate the well-springs of the Sinha-le movement, and
engage with, to the extent possible, its proponents. Some propose
strategic inaction - hoping these movements will die down after a period
of time. The danger around this approach is that the opposite will
happen, and by the time policymakers take note, adequate, timely
responses are significantly more complex to generate. As Sri Lanka
embarks upon constitutional reform and other major projects this year,
involving the whole of government and reshaping how we see our country,
I expect Sinha-le to be the first salvo in what will be many more
movements, on similar lines, that attempt to deny, destroy and decry the
essential diversity in our country. The litmus test will be around how
we respond to extremism, and what measures can be proactively taken to
combat the growth of these movements amongst young adults - the future
leaders of Sri Lanka. |