Is employee turnover bad for organisations?
Attracting and retaining talent is a never-ending quest for
performance-driven employers. Even the best employer in the world has to
deal with employee turnover, therefore, having a handle on it is
important.
Whether it is a result of talent being sought by competitors,
employees seeking career advancement elsewhere, or simply replacing bad
hires and low performers who aren't pulling their weight - every
business inevitably needs to deal with employee turnover.
Is employee turnover bad for organisations? It's important for
organisations to have a healthy turnover. However, whether or not that
'number' is healthy depends more on who is leaving rather than the
percentage of employees leaving.
The amount of internal instability that occurs when there is a large
number of departures, and how that instability affects the company as a
whole, largely depends on your organisation, your industry, and the core
competencies needed for the incumbent position. Dealing with all these
challenges proactively and positively can ease the transition for
everyone and ensure 'departure fever' doesn't spread to other valuable
members of your corporate community.
Warning signal
Leaders and managers who look solely at the employee turnover numbers
may assume a low turnover rate is an indication of great management
practices. But low turnover can be a warning signal too.
That's why the right HR practices are paramount to prevent the
organisation from becoming a ward for poor or mediocre performers. Those
outside of human resources may see any turnover as bad news.
From a HR standpoint, we know that there's bad, good and neutral
turnover, and to categorise it all as a reflection of organisational
management isn't necessarily a fair assessment.
When determining whether or not specific instances of turnover are
bad or good, there are many factors to measure. These include employee
performance, skills and contribution to the company, how difficult it
will be to replace those, reasons for leaving, where they go after they
leave you? Is it to your competitor and how critical their role is to
the success of the business? It goes without saying that losing a top
performer is never a good thing. It may be neutral depending on certain
factors, such as his motivation for leaving coupled with how easy it is
to replace them.
However, beyond the top performers it can get a little hairy. The
question is how do you manage employee turnover so that it's beneficial
to your organisation and ensure it doesn't negatively impact the
performance of your top-end performers?
Impact
The organisation actually benefits when some categories of employees
leave it. Such as, a poor or low performer who brings the average level
of team performance down, an employee who doesn't fall in line with the
organisation culture that disturbs the rhythm of the organisation, an
employee who has 'grandfathered' into his position, ceased to provide
value, an employee known to offend others and only make complaints.
These are a few examples of what good turnover looks like. Remember
that turnover is a valuable way to measure your HR department's and your
key leaders people management performance as long as you don't get
caught up in the numbers and forget to look at the impact, whether
positive or negative, that each 'loss' had on your organisation.
Costly
When it comes to employee retention, most organisations make use of
counter-offers and exit interviews to try to keep their most valuable
employees and to uncover the unknown facts. But I advocate, with my long
years of people management experience, the use of 'stay interviews' as
an effective retention tactic, and the variety of efforts that aim to
increase employee satisfaction and engagement.
Regardless of whether it's healthy or not, employee turnover can be
costly. Replacing top-level positions needs substantially more financing
relative to lower levels, extensive training and adjustment, and a high
element of risk - as new management can drastically alter the status
quo.
But turnover at every level means recruiting, training, workload
balancing and cultural shifts. It's critical for your organisation's
financial and overall health to manage turnover effectively. My mantra
for HR and functional leaders and managers is; ensure good turnover and
minimise bad turnover. Proactively manage it to raise the overall
performance of your team to improve the quality and speed of solutions
to the ever growing business challenges.
|