Govt. stumped by coal fraud :
SLFP leaders get tough on Paada Yaathra
The
Paada Yaathra, organised by the UPFA rebel group last week, was a hot
topic among SLFP seniors over the past few days with the party Central
Committee deciding to initiate stern action against those who violated
party discipline.
Before the SLFP Central Committee meeting on Thursday night, a group
of SLFP seniors held several rounds of discussion with the President
over the party’s future course of action in the light of the rebel
group’s Paada Yaatra.
The primary focus of their discussions was to assess the real
strength of the rebel group and how it would affect the SLFP at the next
Local Government election.
“We all know that the Rajapaksa group is good at showing crowds and
manipulating media. They showed crowds before the Presidential election
but it did not translate into votes. The same trend was seen at the
Parliamentary election where the party managed to secure only 95 seats.
When they held rallies at various places there was significant crowd
support but there was hardly any impact on the village level. So, it was
important to assess the true strength of the rebel group before deciding
our future course of action,” a senior SLFP Parliamentarian, who was
privy to those discussions, told the Sunday Observer.
It was quite clear that the majority of SLFP seniors were livid at
the unruly conduct of the rebel group’s supporters. The rebel group,
which calls itself the ‘Joint Opposition’ (JO), particularly came under
fire for hooting at the Party headquarters, at Darley Road, during the
last stage of the Paada Yaathra march.
The party seniors’ patience was wearing thin and they insisted that
stern action should be taken to instill discipline in the party and
restructure it at the grassroots level. “Enough is enough” was the
common sentiment among party seniors who discussed the matter with the
President before the Central Committee meeting on Thursday. In this
context, many assumed that Thursday’s meeting of the Central Committee
would be characterized with fireworks.
Suspended
|
The committee appointed to
investigate the coal tender issue handed over its findings to
the Minister of Power and Renewable Energy, Ranjith
Siyambalapitiya, on Monday evening. Pic: ANCL Media Library |
When the SLFP Central Committee met on Thursday night at the
President’s House, the majority of committee members were on the same
page about taking action against the rebel group.
They first discussed the matter of several Local Government
representatives of the party burning the letters sent to them by the
party headquarters, calling for interviews to assess their suitability
to contest on the SLFP at the Local Government election. The Central
Committee members said in no uncertain terms that burning the official
letters sent by the party headquarters was a grave insult to the SLFP.
At this point, the party decided to initiate tough action against
them. The Central Committee assigned the party’s Disciplinary Committee
to take necessary action in this regard.
Meanwhile, a group of Central Committee members highlighted a
statement made by Puttalam district MP Sanath Nishantha saying that the
latter did not accept the leadership of party Chairman, President
Maithripala Sirisena.
Nishantha had reportedly launched a verbal barrage against President
Sirisena during a recent television show and its footage was widely
shared on social media platforms.
Anura Yapa ducks
The Central Committee then unanimously decided to initiate
disciplinary action immediately against MP Nisantha on the basis that
there was sufficient evidence to prove that he had rejected President
Maithripala Sirisena’s leadership. The Parliamentarian’s party
membership was suspended ahead of a disciplinary inquiry into his
conduct.
The Committee also agreed to entrust the Disciplinary Committee with
the task of identifying those who insulted the party and its leadership
during the Paada Yaatra protest march, launched by the Joint Opposition.
A senior Parliamentarian of the party told the Sunday Observer that this
inquiry would cover those who hooted at the party headquarters on the
final day of the Paada Yaathra.
“On Thursday evening, we had two important meetings, one was with
leading SLFP activists and the President on party reforms and the second
meeting held later was the convening of the Central Committee,” said
State Minister for Finance, Lakshman Yapa Abeywardena at a media
briefing held at the Ministry of Finance, on Friday, disclosing what
happened at the Central Committee meeting.
MR’s excuse
“There needs to be discipline in a party. Members who hoot at or
throw stones at the party headquarters cannot be its members. Those who
did that to Sirikotha are still suffering,” Abeywardena also added. The
minister’s remark again showed the SLFP’s disappointment over the
conduct of the rebel group.
However, when the same matter was raised at the weekly Cabinet
briefing on Wednesday, former SLFP General Secretary Minister Anura
Priyadarshana Yapa ducked the questions saying he did not see the faces
of those who hooted at the party headquarters!
Meanwhile, in an interesting turn of events, former President Mahinda
Rajapaksa, who led the Paada Yaathra march when his supporters hooted at
the party headquarters, came up with an excuse to defend their conduct.
“They should think as to why people hooted opposite the SLFP
headquarters while being silent in respect of SLFP leaders and former
Prime Ministers in front of the Bandaranaike Samadhi at Horagolla,”
Rajapaksa said, speaking to a group of reporters, after a religious
event at Abhayaramaya temple, Narahenpita. Rajapaksa’s ‘excuse’ made it
clear that the act was well orchestrated and deliberate.
Restructuring
However, the SLFP’s rebels have already indicated that they would not
cooperate with the party’s disciplinary inquiry process. Speaking to the
Sunday Observer, UPFA MP Sanath Nishantha said he did nothing wrong and
he would strongly stand-by his stance. This was a clear indication that
the MP did not accept the party Central Committee’s decision on the
matter.
Another rebel group MP, Dilum Amunugama, told a gathering in Kandy
that they would take legal action against the SLFP if the party decided
to suspend their membership. This shows that the gap between the two
warring groups within the SLFP is widening.
The SLFP too, on the other hand, is preparing for a major but
unavoidable split. Party General Secretary Duminda Dissanayake told
media last week that the party had decided to embark on a major
restructuring program. “Those who want to divide the party will anyway
attempt to divide the party. We are not afraid of their efforts. We will
proceed with our plans for restructuring,” Dissanyake told reporters,
this week, speaking to reporters following the rebel group’s Paada
Yaathra campaign.
“It is quite obvious that the rebel group wants to form a separate
political party before the Local Government election. They are preparing
the ground for that with campaigns such as the Paada Yaathra. The party,
at this point, has to prepare for an inevitable split. That’s why we
have opened the doors for new applicants. That’s why we have decided to
fast track the restructuring program,” another SLFP Central Committee
member told the Sunday Observer, on Saturday.
In response, the party’s Local Government representatives supporting
former President Rajapaksa have already shown a hostile approach towards
the party’s stance. Speaking to media a few days after the Paada Yaathra,
former Mayor of Moratuwa, Samanlal Fernando said, they would not contest
the forthcoming Local Government election on the SLFP ticket.
“We will contest the election under a broad political alliance under
the leadership of former President Rajapaksa. We hope the SLFP too will
join us,” Fernando said, expressing the sentiments of the LG members
supporting the rebel group.
Actresses
Meanwhile, in another interesting turn of events, two actresses
supporting the former President’s camp put their feet in the mouths when
they attempted to show their solidarity with farcical remarks.
One of them was Geetha Kumarasinghe who also functions as an elected
Parliamentarian of the UPFA.
Kumarasinghe, addressing a press briefing in Colombo a few days ago,
said over 20 million people attended the Joint Opposition’s Paada
Yaathra. Therefore, going by the reports released by the Department of
Census of Statistics, one can safely come to the conclusion that the
entire population of the country had taken part in the Paada Yaathra
campaign!
“This is the power of the people. The government is afraid of the
people’s support received by the Joint Opposition. All anti-government
forces have now rallied around the Joint Opposition. Our supporters
defied rain and many other difficulties to attend the Joint Opposition’s
Paada Yaathra. That demonstrated the love they had for former President
Rajapaksa,” Kumarasinghe said, boasting about the success of their
political campaigns. However, none of the politicians present at the
press conference stepped in to correct the Galle district
Parliamentarian’s monumental blunder.
Oshadi Hewamadduma, another actress supporting the Joint Opposition
campaign, made an equally farcical remark when she commented in public
on the charges under which former Economic Development Minister Basil
Rajapaksa was arrested.
“The former Economic Development Minister was arrested for
distributing almanacs (litha). Why was he arrested for distributing
almanacs? Almanac is an essential part of our culture. Under the guise
of arresting Basil Rajapaksa, the government is attacking our culture
and traditions!” the actress said, raising many an eyebrow.
Coal bombshell
Her farcical statement came under fire on social media platforms and
it made a disastrous impact on the joint Opposition group’s propaganda
campaign this week.
“Both these actress walked alongside former President Rajapaksa, when
the latter attended the last stage of the Paada Yaathra rally at Town
Hall junction in Colombo. When the former President has friends like
them, he does not need enemies!” a senior SLFP Parliamentarian quipped,
during one of the party’s ‘inner circle discussions’.
The recent bombshell reported in our sister paper, the Daily News,
had the Ministry of Power and Energy reeling at the discovery that
internal audit revealed a Rs. 300 million fraud in connection with the
purchase of coal for the Lakvijaya Plant in Norochcholai.
Transparency groups now claim that the Right to Information Bill (RTI)
has to be implemented as fast as possible, to help good governance in
situations like this, where the public would need more information to
understand the depths of an alleged crime. One concerned party told the
Sunday Observer that what was necessary in this case was quick access to
copies of the contract, invoices, bills of lading, quality certificates
at load and discharge ports and the letters of credit. Analysing these
documents, one could get to the bottom of how this manipulation was
orchestrated.
Informed sources said that there was a difference between the
requirement stipulated in the tender document and the signed contract.
In the signed contract, formulas for the penalty for high sulphur and
high ash contents in the coal supplies had been surreptitiously altered
to the advantage of the supplier.
In the case of high sulphur, the price adjustment formula has been
tampered with i.e. where it had to be divided by 0.1 percent, the
contract had stated it as 1 percent and in the case of ash content, the
division which should have been by 1 percent had been adjusted to 10
percent, allowing the seller to understate the penalty by 90 percent.
The transparency activists say that this is clearly a matter for the
bribery commission under section 70, as the public servants involved in
this act have to be investigated.
Section 70 says that “any public servant who, with the intent, to
cause wrongful or unlawful loss to the Government, or to confer a
wrongful or unlawful benefit, favour or advantage on himself or any
person, or with knowledge, that any wrongful or unlawful loss will be
caused to any person or to the government, or that any wrongful or
unlawful benefit, favour or advantage will be conferred on any person —
a) does or forebears to do, any act, which he is empowered to do by
virtue of his office as a public servant; b) induce any other public
servant servant to perform, or refrain from performing, any act, which
the other public servant is empowered to do by virtue of his office as a
public servant; c) uses any information coming to his knowledge by
virtue of his office as a public servant; d) participates in the making
of any decision by virtue of his office as a public servant; e) induces
any other person, by the use, whether directly or indirectly, of his
office as a public servant to perform, or refrain from performing, any
act; shall be guilty of the offense of corruption and shall upon summary
trial and conviction by a magistrate be liable to imprisonment for a
term not exceeding 10 years or to a fine not exceeding Rs. 100,000 or to
both imprisonment and fine.”
Considering that such alterations had been accommodated in a contract
between the seller, Liberty Commodities Limited and the Lanka Coal
Company Pvt. Ltd, at the expense of the public having to bear the
consequences, Transparency groups say that the public officials involved
in this transaction have to take the fall. Especially due to the fact
that proper checks and balances have not been made, by not sending the
contract to be vetted by the Attorney General’s Department prior to
signing; a required practice for transparency and good governance. They
say that in public interests this matter has to be taken to the bribery
commission for investigation.
Report to Minister
It was in this backdrop that the committee of three appointed to
investigate the coal tender issue regarding the Norochcholai coal power
plant, handed over its findings in a report to the Minister of Power and
Renewable Energy, RanjithSiyambalapitiya, on Monday evening.
The committee comprising of K.K.Y. Perera, Lakshman R. Watawala and
Janaka Ekanayake, was appointed by the minister last month to probe the
issue. Many believe that the content of the committee report will be a
key factor in determining the future of the coal controversy. The
ministry has so far kept the content of the experts’ committee report as
a closely guarded secret.
However, The findings of the reporting, according to highly placed
ministry sources, will soon be produced in Parliament. The Auditor
General is also scheduled to submit his report on the controversial coal
tender to COPE within the next two weeks.
That report is being prepared at the request of the COPE. It is
reported that the Audit had been submitted to the CEB from time to time
since 2009 but the CEB has acted without taking the Auditor General’s
recommendations into consideration. Many opine that the COPE report on
the coal controversy will stir up a hornets’ nest, especially among
political circles as many some believe that political power may have
played a significant role in the whole issue. |