Sudden removal of professionals causes ...:
Stir in education
Manjula Fernando
|
|
|
|
Minister Akila
Viraj Kariyawasam |
Dr. Nirmal
Ranjith Devasiri |
Secretary, Ministry of
Education, W. M. Bandusena |
Mahinda Jayasinghe |
The sudden removal of professionals in the National Institute of
Education (NIE) Governing Council, a move independent observers dubbed
unethical and arbitrary, questions the good governance policies of the
Education Ministry.
Late last week, frantic efforts were made at the Education Ministry
to find 'fitting personalities' to fill the vacant seats, with four
names being proposed so far.
The officials argue, the minister is in fact empowered to appoint and
dismiss eight of the members in the 12 member NIE Council, excluding the
four ex-officio members - the Education Ministry Secretary, NIE Director
General and a representative each from the Treasury and the Higher
Education Ministry.
A spokesperson at the NIE Director General's office said, they
haven't received a 'definite list' nominating new members to the Council
from the Ministry, yet.
The NIE Director General (DG) is the Chief Executive Officer of the
Council and is directly responsible to the council for the efficient
functioning of the Institute. The Secretary of the Ministry of Education
is the Chief Accounting Officer and Chairman of the Council.
Although the Minister was empowered to appoint and remove the Members
of the Council, the arbitrary manner in which the dismissal took place
is being criticized in the academia. The Council members were taken by
surprise when they were handed the letter by the Education Ministry
Secretary, issued on the instructions of the Education Minister Akila
Viraj Kariyawasam. It announced the unceremonious removal of the
university academics, some of whom were Goliaths behind the rainbow
revolution that crowned the good governance government.
The NIE Council is the supreme governing body of the Institute, and
is vested with the administration, management and control of the affairs
of the NIE. The Academic Affairs Board of the NIE which decides on the
standards, contents, curricula and evaluation process of academic
programs undertaken by the Institute, functions under the Council.
The council members were leading a campaign to reform the NIE
structure at the time they were sacked without any given reason. They
were demanding critical changes to revamp the entire school education
sector which was a long felt need. Apparently, their call did not go
down well with the education big wigs who saw them as a bunch of trouble
makers. The former members said, the rigid attitude of the DG was the
main cause for dissent. The council, appointed in April 2015 was
dysfunctional since December last year.
By the time they have had six meetings in all. The removal letter
which said, 'their services were no longer needed' did not give specific
reasons for the sudden action nor did it say that the council members
have broken any rules.
But a subsequent press release issued by the Education Ministry Media
Unit gave some explanation.
The Ministry release signed by the media secretary stated, "The
government was making a mammoth effort to transform the school education
sector to improve its standard and relevance for which the NIE must play
a central role.
But of late due to internal strife and disputes among members of the
council, the NIE failed to fulfil its expected objectives. "
It justified the Minister's action that he had no other option but to
resort to this arbitrary decision, in spite of the fact that it was
undemocratic and unethical.
The Minister later criticised, saying , some members were leaking the
internal issues and matters discussed at council meetings to the media.
He charged, some former members on the Governing Council of the NIE had
violated both the NIE Act and collective responsibility as Council
Members. (The Sunday Times July 31) However, the NIE Act did not bind
the council members, who are independent academics, to an oath of
secrecy. Besides, with the Right to Information Act now securely in
place, there is all the more reason to publicly discuss matters of
public interest, the academics argued. Yet, some of the legislators and
bureaucrats seemed reluctant to accept the laws upholding people's right
to know and had forgotten that the RTI was a piece of legislation fully
sponsored by the government.
Meanwhile, a former council member among those axed, Dr. Nirmal
Ranjith Devasiri contradicted the reasons listed by the Education
authorities for their removal. Prof Jayadewa Uyangoda, Dr. Nirmal
Ranjith Dewasiri, Prof. W. D. W. Jayathilaka and Prof. D. S. Epitawatta
who served on the Council received the letters of removal from the
Education Secretary.
Dr Devasiri said: Quote, "It is absolute nonsense. I cannot
understand the logic behind that letter. We could not believe that the
Secretary would issue a letter like this. In fact, it was between him
and the Director General that there was a verbal barrage at the last
council meeting in December.
"It is also false to say there were disagreements between the council
members. We were collectively against the way the DG handled the issue,
while the claims that the members behaved in an unruly manner were
fabricated.
"The actual reason for their removal is their call for sweeping
reforms within the NIE and the entire education sector. We need to
revisit the entire functioning of the NIE. Those who enjoy various
privileges in the system are threatened, and fear that they will lose
their perks - therefore they stood in the way to block their plans. "We
were not political loyalists, hence it was easy to sacrifice us.
"There were issues in the Grade Ten English medium curriculum, the
way the secondary school history syllabus is being revised and the
manner in which finances at the NIE are handled, violating the
principles of good governance. We have written to the Prime Minister
Ranil Wickremesinghe highlighting these concerns in May this year.
"Among the issues raised are, the dependency of the entire school
education on three exams - Grade Five Scholarship, GCE Ordinary Level
and Advanced Level- the dominance of the tuition industry, the huge
disparity and inequality among state schools, as well as the financial
burden on parents to educate their children. "Since the appointment of
the new Council members in April 2015, we have been raising one issue
after another calling for reforms and capacity building within the NIE.
Prof. Uyangoda is an eminent academic, the services of such people are
vital to the NIE. The government must try to tap the best available
expertise here.
"Whatever the issues raised at the Council, were done so with
substantial evidence and we are not speaking like politicians.
"The former DG Gunapala Nanayakkara was removed by the Education
Minister as a result of these calls and subsequently the Council members
were having disagreements with the present Acting DG.
"Instead of finding a proper solution, the Ministry seems to have
resorted to the easy way out"-Unquote General Secretary of the Ceylon
Teachers' Services Union Mahinda Jayasinghe said, although the Minister
enjoyed powers to remove any council member, it should not be the way a
good governance government behaves. There should have been a proper
inquiry first to see if they violated any rules and caused any harm to
the NIE.
Jayasinghe said, by the Minister's actions it was apparent that he
despised dissenting views and added that they were keeping a close watch
over the developments with a view to retaliate if the Ministry continued
to suppress their voice.
An official at the Director General's office on Thursday said, there
was no 'definite list' from the Ministry to appoint the new council
members, stressing that the Minister had not done anything out of the
book.
"The action to remove them was within his powers," she stressed,
adding that the Council anyway, had not met for six months since January
this year.
The last meeting which was marred by disagreements between the NIE
Director General and the members, was held in December 2015. A Ministry
spokesperson said, four members have already been nominated to the
Council.
The long serving other four members would be allowed to continue in
their positions.
The Education Minister, Ministry Secretary and the NIE Director
General met Prime Minister Wickremesinghe at Temple Trees on Thursday
morning over this matter.
The unusual silence at the other end of the telephone indicated that
something was amiss in the way this whole issue had been handled by the
officials.
The authorities were not ready to confront the media.
Many attempts by the Sunday Observer to speak to the Education
Minister and Education Ministry Secretary W.M. Bandusena for their
comments last week ended in failure. |