‘Political game with Jt. Opp. backing’
Civil society leaders rubbish GMOA elite schools demand
by Manjula Fernando and Maneshka Borham
The mad rush for places in high quality government schools has taken a new
twist recently, with government doctors resorting to lightning strikes and,
other trade union tactics, in their agitation for such a privilege for their
children.
Led by the Government Medical Officers’ Association (GMOA), the doctors have
threatened to extend their protest island-wide, if some 200 of their children
are denied ‘best schools’ by the Education Ministry. It was the first of a kind,
a union strike over access to elite state sector schools for just one section of
the country’s professionals.
This action by the GMOA follows its recent agitation against recognition of
doctors qualifying from the new private medical college, SAITM, Malabe. In the
light of the GMOA’s elite school demand, the following revelations are
noteworthy.
As the list of schools requested by the GMOA for children of its transferred
members were released to the media, serious concerns have been raised, fairness
being one among many. According to the list, the doctors appear to only demand
certain popular ‘national schools’ despite the availability of student places in
other national schools in the respective towns to which they were transferred.
For example, according to the list, a doctor transferred from the Polpithigama
District Hospital to the Polpithigama MOH had requested Maliyadeva College,
Kurunegala, which is 45 kilometers away.
This is despite the foremost national school in the area, Polpithigama National
School, being located adjacent to the Polpithigama MOH office. Likewise, doctors
transferred from Kurunegala to other areas such as Galewela, Dambulla, Kegalle
and Nikaweratiya too have requested their children to be admitted to Maliyadeva
College.
One Doctor who was transferred from the Kurunegala District MOH office to
Kurunegala Teaching Hospital, just a few metres away too felt the urgent need to
request a new school for the child.
Another doctor who received a transfer within the city of Panadura and who is
also residing in Panadura had asked for Visakha Vidyalaya, Colombo. However,
while the publicized list caused embarrassment to the GMOA, Assistant Secretary
of the association Dr. Nalinda Herath made a feeble attempt to justify these
requests. “Every parent wishes the best schools for his children, so I do not
see any wrong in the requests made,” he was quoted as saying at a recent press
briefing. The GMOA, thereafter, challenged the Education Minister to likewise
release lists of children admitted to elite schools without adhering to proper
procedure, after March 31.
The GMOA claimed that while they have the proof they did not wish to publicize
these lists to avoid any embarrassment to those involved.However, the Sunday
Observer has learnt that lists claiming to show such admissions given by the
Ministry of Education too are now making the rounds and shared on social media
by various groups. This calls into question the respect for children’s rights as
well, since their names are being dragged all over social media. The GMOA has
now stressed, their demands should be met by the government if it wishes to
retain doctors in the country and prevent them seeking better opportunities
abroad.
The Sunday Observer obtained the views of a cross section of civil society over
this burning issue and here’s what they had to say:
Civil society activist and lawyer Dr. Nimalka Fernando:
All children in Sri Lanka, irrespective of the profession of the parent, must be
entitled to a good education.
This is guaranteed under the International Convention on Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights to which Sri Lanka is a signatory. What facilities have been
provided for children of plantation and migrant workers who through their sweat
and blood have enriched the country’s coffers? This country is dependent on
remittances from migrant workers.
They also have the equal rights as doctors, to demand admission to the best
schools for their children. The medical profession has carried out several
undignified struggles during the past two years. The GMOA has launched two
struggles recently, one against the ETCA and the latest is the school fiasco.
Both are based on special privileges.
The former demand related to a threat they would face with the expansion of the
‘health-care’ sector in the private domain. Yet, one of the private hospitals
where the government held shares during the Mahinda Rajapaksa regime had Indian
doctors.
The GMOA was silent at the time. What about the Chinese workers employed in all
the construction sites during the previous regime? This is a political game the
present leadership of GMOA has resorted to. It is no secret that the leadership
of GMOA is constantly in touch with the Members of Parliament of the Joint
Opposition and is jointly strategizing before each strike action is launched.
Private practice goes unabated even during strikes in state hospitals.
It is the poor and the marginalized who seek health care from government
hospitals. This is an unjustified struggle. We must endeavour to raise the
standards of all schools to be like Royal, Ananda and Nalanda, and not have such
exclusive club attitude.
Former Federation of University Teachers’ Association (FUTA) President Dr.
Nirmal Ranjith Devasiri:
I am on principle against professionals being given special treatment, be it
popular schools or any other. But there are some practical issues related to
certain groups in state service. University teachers are also among this group.
Unfortunately, this requirement is wrongly interpreted for personal advantage.
The bottom line is, doctors and university teachers are not the only two groups
entitled to this benefit. If the Minister proposes to abolish such special
privileges, it must cover every sector. There should not be discrimination. We
agree that elite groups dominate and enjoy preferential treatment and the
children of poor shanty dwellers are barred from entry to popular schools under
various pretexts.
I am not in favour of the GMOA or any other group infringing the rights of the
general public, but the issue is not as simple as that. If the Education
Minister stands for equal treatment, he has to be consistent. If the officials
deny special treatment for doctors, then the same has to be applied to
politicians and other privileged groups. No one can be allowed to indulge in
their own idiosyncrasies. You must represent a common view. But I admit that
here is an issue of ethics.
Jagath Gunawardene, Environmental Activist and Lawyer:
A union or similar association should only use the strike action as a weapon in
professional situations and not for other personal purposes. By striking for an
issue such as this they have overstepped the boundaries of unionism, using the
strike weapon for personal purposes and holding people to ransom.
It is extremely unbecoming of a supposed professional union. It is not ethical
in any way to act in such a manner. The majority of Doctors are products of free
education and are bound by conscience, morality and duty to serve the country.
It is a transgression of their professional duties, ethics, as well as a
betrayal of trust the people have placed on them.
Only a few get the opportunity to become doctors due to the competition to enter
local universities and therefore, they have a moral obligation to serve the
people. According to the basic tenets of education all children should get equal
opportunity to study in any school around the country. The GMOA or any other
professional body getting what is considered the lion’s share of popular schools
will mean that other children who complete the necessary requisites will be
denied that opportunity. This goes against the basic tenets of free education.
The GMOA´s actions make the group, enemies of free education. Doctors are not
the only professionals or government employees on transferable service. For
example, Police Officers are transferred every four years and many others go
through the same process.
If the government opens the gates to one profession alone by granting such
demands they will not have a way to stop others making similar demands.While I,
in no way, oppose children of professionals being admitted to national schools
it should be done in a fair manner and by not holding the country to ransom.
Rajith Keerthi Tennakoon, Executive Director of CaFFE:
Any trade union, group or association demanding popular schools that are
considered elite for their children is not justifiable under any circumstances.
There is a National Education Policy and all citizens should adhere to it. The
profession of a parent should not be a qualifying factor when granting entrance
to any school.Under the constitution all citizens in a country are equal and
therefore, favouritism to a particular profession is not acceptable. Unlike
other trade unions the GMOA always takes the upper hand regarding transfers of
its members, only making such demands all the more unconscionable.
How justifiable is it to request a new school for a child when the Doctor is
being transferred from Homagama to Maharagama which is a town only a short
distance away? The government should not at all bow down to such demands.
Senior policy analyst
Dr. Sujatha Gamage:
I am strongly of the view that national schools must be open for students who
excel in studies and extra curricular activities across the country, instead of
becoming places that serve children of a privileged few. Due to influential
public servants and old boy-old-girl networks, admissions to popular national
schools are wrought with inequities.
We need to question, how many scholarship holders get due opportunity to get
admitted to these national schools every year, what is their percentage against
others? The popular schools that serve special groups also violate the free
education concept. We must end this culture.
The national schools should not be ‘buses’ that arrive half full with privileged
groups such as doctors’ or politicians’ children. The government servants who go
on transfers should have a school closest to their postings. |