Fiji, paradise at crossroads?
by Ravi Perera
'The Fijian is humble, speaks softly rather than raise his voice. He
listens courteously rather than rebuff rudely'
This appreciation of his people by Ratu Ganilavu, a paramount chief
of the Fiji islands of more recent times, was obviously made in an
effort to highlight their cultural differences with the Indians, the
"other" people now calling his beloved ancestral land home.
The average Fijian as ordained by his Melanesian bloodline is big,
strong and athletic. His traditional bond with tribe and land has given
him a sense of gravity and loyalty. Many outsiders find this aspect of
the Fijians, particularly when combined with the natural, easy-going
disposition of the pacific islanders, powerfully attractive.
Until "history" began towards the end of the 18th Century with
contact with exploring European sailors, the Fijians evidently led a
lifestyle preoccupied with waging war on neighbouring tribes. In the
short intervals between these aggressive forays they occupied themselves
fishing or attending to the little gardens of yams and greens in their
bountiful island homes. It is recorded that cannibalism was rife.
Tribes
Unbeknown to the brave warlike tribes of the Fiji islands, the first
contact with the strange pale men on their large ships foreshadowed the
closing of the chapter on their accustomed way of life. A new era,
defined by written laws, colonies, strange foreigners, plantations and
global markets had begun.
In 1874, bowing to a vaguely understood reality which was
nevertheless perceived as irreversible by the Fijians, the high chiefs
put their mark of acceptance on a Deed of Cession whereby they threw
away their war clubs and placed the destiny of their beloved islands in
the care of a distant European island whose star then was shinning
splendorous.
The British wasted no time in getting about their business. Zealous
missionaries descended on the islands determined to bring the word of
God to the 'benighted heathens' and were hugely successful in converting
the Fijians to Methodism, which to this day is the most powerful church
in the country. The colonial government was able to put an end to tribal
fighting and stamp-out cannibalism.
Efforts of the colonial government to establish cane and cotton
plantations in Fiji proved a lot more controversial and were to have a
drastic impact on its future course. The large number of workers needed
to work the expanding plantations could not be found within the country.
Fijians, carefree and self sufficient, were found to be unsuitable
for the kind of regimented labour necessary for plantation work. In his
natural setting there was no concept of poverty. What little a man
needed was there in plentitude. For the Fijian, the idea of selling
one's labour or begging for his meals was an alien concept.
After a halfhearted search in the Pacific the British turned their
eyes to India, their huge teeming colony in Asia, to find an answer to
the problem of labour for the plantations in Fiji.
The passage of Indians to work as indentured labourers in distant
colonies in the Pacific, Caribbean and Africa was a saga which could
only be rivaled for its sufferings and deprivations by the African slave
trade the centuries before.
Their recruiters had promised these bedraggled immigrants a regular
salary and a new home which many of them assumed was somewhere in India.
A large number of those who en-shipped from ports such as Calcutta and
Bombay perished in the rough seas while en-route to their destinations.
Developments
The Fijians were only curious witnesses to the unfolding developments
in their country. It was generally assumed by them that these obviously
deprived people, after earning a few dollars working in the plantations
of the white man, will return to their own land. But the Indians stayed
on. They worked hard, built the plantation industry, prospered, educated
their children and in time came to almost equal the Fijians in numbers
in the country.
In culture and temperament the Indians were the opposite of the
Fijians. The constant bickering among the newcomers, their apparent
attitude of covert but permanent dissent, the chaotic social conduct
where every one wishes to speak at the same time and the lack of
hierarchical order were things unfamiliar to the native sons of the
land.
They reasoned that the perceived paisa-counting avariciousness of the
new immigrant was the outcome of a faraway culture preoccupied with
poverty and competition for scarce resources.
The Indians also viewed the Fijians with fear and misgivings. They
thought of them as intimidating, unambitious and absorbed in tribalism.
There was very little social inter-action between the communities. The
Indians lived in farms and towns while the Fijians preferred their
villages.
While the tough Fijian is in his element in the bruising game of
Rugby the Indians went for Soccer where physical contact is less
frequent. The Indian plans his investments carefully. A Fijian will
think nothing of partying all night with his friends on payday.
For the Fijian, the dangers and the rugged physicality inherent in
soldiering, was heaven recreated. When their faraway Sovereign to whom
they had now pledged their loyalty went to war in Europe, the Fijians
served her with notable dedication. Even today the country's army is
almost totally constituted of native Fijians.
In 1970 Britain, bored with her imperial responsibilities in the
distant outpost granted independence to Fiji, an act, viewed with
anxiety by both communities. As a colony Fiji had prospered and was
considered the most advanced economy in the South Pacific.
The Constitution adopted in 1970 acknowledged the Fijian claim to
primacy and introduced the idea of race-based electoral rolls, which
accentuated the divide. Their undeniable economic gains made it easier
for the Indian community to reconcile with a situation where they were
politically less than equal.
The appointment at the outset of the patrician High Chief Ratu
Kamisese Mara as Prime Minister, a moderate respected by all
communities, helped to achieve almost two decades of peaceful progress
in Fiji.
The elections of 1987 upset the apple cart. In a close result, the
Labour Party, which was led by Dr. Bavendra a Fijian academic, defeated
the ruling party thus moving the experienced Ratu Mara to the
opposition.
Not only was Dr.Bavendra a commoner, but it was also widely accepted
that the union based Labour Party was predominantly Indian dominated.
This deeply rankled the Fijians who saw it both as an affront to their
High Chief as well as an attempt by Indians to gain control of the
government using a few Fijians as a front.
A few weeks later Colonel Sitiveni Rabuka, a reputed soldier, led the
Army in a coup, which deposed the short-lived Bavendra government and
reinstalled Ratu Mara as Prime Minister before getting back to barracks.
This unconstitutional act led to the suspension of Fiji from the
Commonwealth as well as to various economic sanctions by international
organizations. The period, which followed, was marked by attempts to
find a stable constitutional arrangement for the divided nation, which
included the adoption of two Constitutions, in 1990 and then in 1997.
Fijian politics
The 1999 elections saw a coalition of political parties led by labour
leader Mahendra Chaudry gaining power, making him the first ethnic
Indian to become Fiji's Prime Minister.Chaudry's declared intention of
whittling down some of the privileges accorded to the native Fijians and
his somewhat abrasive style set the stage for the coup of May 2000.
This was led by a failed businessman by the name of George Speight
who was of mixed Fijian ethnicity.
Speight simply marched on parliament with a small group of renegade
soldiers and Fijian toughs to oust the civilian government by an act of
plain thuggary. In Fiji the power to coerce is exclusively in the hands
of the native Fijians who by and large had no sympathy for the Chaudry
government and preferred to remain mere spectators to the ugly drama
enacted at their parliament.
In fact the recently deposed Prime Minister Laisema Qarase described
George Speight's blatant attack of the concept of constitutionality as
'an act of God'. |