The new dynamics for higher education
Facing global and local:
The
opening remarks made by Minister of Higher Education, Prof.
Wiswa Warnapala, at the round-table conference held at the
sub-regional Conference of South, South-West and Central
Asia on Higher Education, in New Delhi, India. |
The Sri Lankan system of university education began in 1921 with the
establishment of the University College, which in 1942, was elevated to
the status of a fully-fledged University, which, at its inception,
accommodated only 904 students. The University of Ceylon was modelled on
the Oxbridge formula, and it was elitist and exclusively residential in
character.
This system of University education, which came to be built on the
ideas and ideals of the late Sir Ivor Jennings, having served a valuable
purpose in providing administrative and professional skills in the three
decades after the establishment of the University of Ceylon, became
outmoded when the impact of the Free Education Scheme came to be felt in
the country.
Free education
Since 1945, this country has been enjoying what is called the Free
Education Scheme, under which education is free from kindergarten
onwards until one obtains a first degree from a University. This became
an integral part of our social welfarism which we developed since the
thirties, and though a massive burden on the Sri Lankan State, it is
still continued because it is part and parcel of the political culture
of country. No Government is willing to touch it because it is
interwoven with the electoral fortunes of political parties. Apart from
that, it still offers opportunities to rural children who otherwise may
not find access to both secondary and higher education. Sri Lanka, on
the basis of this social welfare oriented scheme of education, has
constructed what is called the Social Demand Model of Education, through
which the country has been modernized in a wide variety of ways. We have
achieved the highest literacy rate in this part of the world.
‘Redbrick’ formula
Sri Lanka can be proud of such achievements as universal primary
enrolment, equality of educational opportunity and near gender equality.
The impact of the Free Education Scheme came to be felt in the sixties
and seventies, and the University system, in response to those
pressures, some of which were political in character, made certain
adjustments whereby the system underwent a change. There was immense
dissatisfaction with the Oxbridge model, from which we wanted to break
away in order to accommodate in ‘Redbrick’ formula which brought about
an impressive change in Britain. It was on the basis of this formula
that Sri Lanka established provincial Universities to expand the
opportunities for higher education.
 |
University of Ruhuna |
These universities are new, and their infrastructure not yet
developed, even though the new system broke away from the mould of the
conventional university.
They introduced new courses which have been organised on the basis of
the concept of employability. Our present policy strategy is to produce
an employable competent graduate, who can find employment in whatever
field he or she undertake to study.
By establishing the Sri Lanka Institute of Advanced Technological
Education (SLIATE) in 1994, the Government created a system of
technological education to meet the demand for training which, at the
time, was unheard of in higher education. This kind of Institution, such
as the SLIATE, had to be in step with industrial and technological
changes in the country, particularly with regard to the technology
implemented globally. Public and private institutions engaged in
development could then make use if this intermediate level of
technicians who, in due course, could obtain higher qualifications.
Development institutions
Although there is a comprehensive system of Higher Education in the
country, the question is whether the system can absorb all the young men
and women who seek to enter the system. In other words, the question of
access is the main issue. In Sri Lanka, the enrolment rate is
tremendously low when compared to other countries. The enrolment rate in
the US is over 50 per cent and the average rate for developing countries
was 5 per cent. In Sri Lanka, enrolment in Universities have stagnated
around 2 to 2.5 per cent and it is in this context that one has to look
at the importance of Distance Mode as way of overcoming one of the major
problems in the Higher Education sector. In the beginning, I mentioned
that the elite-orientation of the university underwent a change. With a
view to providing more access, the universities began to expand but the
existing system failed to enroll the number of students who qualified at
the G.C.E. A/Level examination which, in Sri Lanka, is a highly
competitive examination.
The greatest challenge in the 21st century for higher education is
the recognition of relevance. By relevance, we mean the need to adapt to
the immediate needs of the job market. This, in other words, means that
the universities should produce an employable graduate. Through the
universities, we need to prepare individuals to contribute to the social
and economic development of the country which can be fruitfully achieved
if the undergraduates are provided with the relevant skills and the
knowledge. It is in this context that higher education needs to be
defined as a public service.
Higher education can also be defined as that which contributes to
cultural, economic and social development within the context of
pluralism and cultural diversity. It is accepted that higher education,
in any given society, whether developed or developing, has to play a
role in the production and transmission of knowledge. Knowledge is
universal and has become the heritage of the mankind. How can we convert
universities into knowledgeable institutions? The institutions in the
sphere of higher education need to be encouraged to perform an active,
creative and innovative role to help change society. In other words,
universities should function as development institutions - institutions
which promote and encourage development.
Provincial universities
It was in this given background that the government, in the period
1994 - 2000, decided to establish universities in the provinces. The
provincialisation of universities, which, in terms of policy, was an
attempt to emulate the Red Brick scheme of Britain, through which
industrialisation of Britain was accelerated.
In other words, it was our realisation that the Oxbridge Model had
already become outmoded and that the country, therefore needed a new
model that could successfully cater to specific needs. The view was that
the traditional conventional University, with its traditional
disciplines, was not the type of university that the country required at
this juncture; the country needed a set of new universities which could
specialise on courses of studies that are immediately relevant to
economic development. Above all, they needed to be courses with which
the employability of the graduate could be guaranteed. Therefore, the
new universities, which came to be established on the basis of this
formula, were expected to be innovative in character.
Conclusion
In conclusion may I say that the higher education, in the context of
current developments in Sri Lanka, is of paramount importance for
economic and social development. Today, in the global context, challenge
before all countries, specially South Asia, is how to improve the higher
education as this sector, due to a variety of problems including that of
fiscal constraints, face numerous problems which demand new policy
initiatives. The Sri Lankan system of higher education, based on a rich
historical tradition, could be reformed in such a way as to see that the
system could make a noteworthy contribution to both development and
change in the country, and new policy initiatives and a reform strategy
being planned and adopted with a view to reforming the system on the
basis of both local and global considerations. |