Understanding Ozu
In recent times, there has been a resurgence of interest in the work
of Yasujiro Ozu. He is, by common consent, one of the greatest Japanese
filmmakers of all time. Some critics have called him the greatest
Japanese film director; others would prefer to bestow that high honour
on Akira Kurosawa.
That Ozu was a remarkable filmmaker, with a distinctive style of his
own, that drew on traditional Japanese aesthetics is a fact that almost
all discerning commentators of Japanese cinema would not contest.
Yasujiro Ozu was born in 1903 and died in 1963; over fifty of his
films are currently available; some were lost.
He was preoccupied with one central theme - the Japanese family and
is palpable decline as a consequence of the impact of the forces of
modernization and Westernization.
While he dealt with this theme in a way that engendered a complex
clarity, he was also deeply interested in forging a visual style that
was consonant with the structures of feeling of the Japanese. Ozu, like
his younger contemporary Akira Kurosawa, was profoundly influenced by
Hollywood.
At the same time, he sought to re-discover the vitality of Japanese
aesthetics and poetics of as a consequence of this encounter with the
West. He was clearly inspired by Zen Buddhism; the sense of restraint
and serenity that mark his films bear evidence to this fact.
Stylistically speaking there are a number defining features in
Yasujiro Ozu's films; the pace of his films is extremely slow, almost
meditative; his camera which is immobile most of the time is placed
about three feet from the floor; the intention is to capture the
low-level viewpoint of Japanese seated on a 'tatami' mat.
Most of the action of his films takes place inside homes. Some
critics of Japanese cinema have maintained that the poetics of his
cinema can be usefully related to Zen Buddhist culture as well such
facets of Japanese culture as haiku poetry, flower arrangement, the tea
ceremony, and ink paintings.
The Japanese concept of 'mono no aware' or melancholia, according to
some, opens a wonderful window onto the creative imagination of Yasijiro
Ozu.
A certain charming minimalism informs Ozu's cinema. The unchanging
angle of vision, stationary camera, limited deployment of cinematic
punctuations like dissolves and fade-ins, underline this fact.
Some years ago, in my book 'Cinema and Cultural Identity' (University
Press of America), speaking of Ozu's cinema I made the following
observation.
'Ozu's central theme, the nature of the Japanese family, his vision
of wistful sadness, and his technique if filmmaking - distinguished by
stationary and low-level camera set-ups, frontality of image,
arrangement of characters, tempo, and the constant focus on empty rooms-
can most easily be related to the traditional Japanese artistic
sensibility.'
Some Western scholars like David Bordwell, who admire greatly the
work of Ozu, reject such a clear-cut delineation of Japanese aesthetics
as overly simplistic.
He insists on the need to bring into the equation such factors as the
historical context in which he worked, the way Japanese tradition was,
as all traditions are, constructed from the perspective of current
concerns, and the interplay between Hollywood and Japanese culture in
his imagination.
Ozu dealt with simple stories, non-heroic, mundane, underlining the
extraordinary in the ordinary. Let us for example consider 'Tokyo
Story', one of his most memorable films. It has been selected by many
film scholars and critics, as one of the greatest films ever made.
Its story is uncomplicated. Two elderly parents who live in the
provinces - in the seaside town of Onomichi - decide to visit their
children living in Tokyo.
They are full of expectations. However, when they meet the children,
they feel neglected. The children are busy, have their on lives to lead,
and have very little time to spend with their parents. Only the widowed
daughter-in-law, Noriko, is happy to spend some time with them and
entertain them.
This sense of despair is what is at the heart of the film. The
decline of the Japanese family, his pet theme, is clearly articulated in
'Tokyo Story'.
Yasujiro's Ozu's films are significant in terms of the use of space
and time. The way he invests space, both full and empty, with human
meaning is indeed interesting. Similarly, the ways in which he makes use
of time compels admiration. Gilles Deleuze, the eminent French
philosopher, has written two important books on cinematic time and image
- what he terms movement image and time image. Movement image represents
succession of instants of time, while time image is a direct
representation of time. He finds the time image used imaginatively and
productively by Ozu.
Ozu is a continuing presence in international cinema. Filmmakers from
Taiwan to India, as well as those in the West, have been inspired by his
work.
|