Energy needs and our future options
by Patali CHAMPIKA RANAWAKA
With the beginning of a new decade, the year 2010 has dawned. The
decade, 2010 to 2020 is considered to be vital to all human beings as it
would be the period within which, the oil production will reach its peak
and then decline, triggering unprecedented serious economic and social
repercussions. On the other hand, endorsing pessimistic forecasts,
environmentalists and physical scientists have collectively warned that
the failure on our part to shift towards sustainable development would
result in irreparable damage being done to the global environment.
If we allow the present trends to take its course, some parts of the
African continent may become permanent deserts, some countries may
remain permanently inundated by oceanic waters, some glaziers and ice
caps may permanently melt down and hot water and air may force some
species to face extinction. Therefore, the scarcity of fossil fuels and
the global warming caused by fossil fuels on the other hand, have
compelled us to change our development pattern.
When I recently read the new bumpy issue of "The Economist" magazine,
which carries details of the world economic situation in 2010, I was
releived. It shows that most of the countries affected by the global
recession will recover by 2010 and even the debt ridden USA and EU
countries may achieve positive growth rates amidst serious financial
crisis. I was proud to see that our country, Sri Lanka, ranked among the
top growers, being eighth in the world! As the global economy would
emerge from the recession, it is predicted that Sri Lanka would record a
6.3% GDP growth rate which is second only to China, which will record
8.6% in the Asian region.
Our stock market was ranked second in the world! It is also predicted
that the oil prices will vary from US$ 74-80 during the period of 2010
to 2012. So, there is every sign of Sri Lanka having a great leap
forward in the sphere of economic prosperity. Having established sound
security and political stability with our significant infrastructure
development, we may reach a stage of a global hypo centre for energy,
naval, aviation, commercial and knowledge.
With determination, we must regain what we have lost. The strategic
value of our geographical position, our natural resources on our
continental shelf and our very literate learned human resources should
be treated as great opportunities, which are needed to be exploited for
our benefit. Also, it has been predicted that we would be able to double
our per-capita income level (from 2500 US$ to 5000 US$) during the
period of 2010 to 2016.
But we should not forget the fact that we would not be able to follow
the same path that the western countries had followed in the past.
Since we are now entering a new decade, which could be the turning
point in our history, we have to build structures which could one day be
transformed into sustainable development.
As we cannot depend on fossil fuels anymore, the biggest challenge we
will have to meet during this decade would be to find ways and means of
producing our own energy needs. Therefore, to work towards our economic
prosperity and sustainable development, it is of paramount importance
for us to analyze our energy situation.
If we consider the share of primary energy supply in 1980, nearly 70%
of the total energy was coming from biomass and nearly 5% of energy was
coming from hydro power. Therefore, 75% of the total energy needs were
generated from renewable sources. In 1990 the share of biomass remained
70% and the hydro power share had risen to 10% (due to Mahaweli Scheme)
thereby, 80% of the total energy being generated from renewable energy
sources. When the whole world was depending on fossil fuels for energy
needs, (86% of total energy was generated by fossil fuels where 36% from
oil, 28% from coal, 22% from natural gas) we had a very sustainable
eco-friendly energy usage pattern, which was diametrically opposite to
what the world had practised.
After 1990, the situation had dramatically changed by more and more
fossil fuel being used to generate energy, completely neglecting the
enhancement of hydro power, biomass energy or other renewable energies.
As a result, in year 2000, the share of the bio mass to primary energy
was reduced to 50% (now it is 48%) and the share of hydro power was
reduced to 8%. However, as the petroleum share was increased to 42%, our
energy security and sustainability had eroded and since then we have
been heavily depending on oil exportation.
Unfortunately, we are now saddled with the problem of borrowing money
from foreign sources to settle our oil bills. If we consider our
electricity sector, the situation is much worse than the total energy
sector. In year 1990, 99.8% of total electricity was generated using
hydro power and our per unit cost (Kwhr) was Rs.2/=. However, subsequent
years showed development of two trends.
One was the electricity sector planners being more and more inclined
towards using fossil fuels as oil and coal had been their only options.
The second one was for them to ignore the generation plans due to
various political pressure. The result was blackouts and power cuts.
Then the CEB introduced a new scheme to buy power from the private
sector producers (PPP) on emergency basis. In year 2000, our hydro power
share was reduced to 47% whereas, the thermal power was 53% of the total
value. Accordingly, our selling price was raised to Rs.5/= although its
generation cost had been much more, causing heavy losses to the CEB and
our economy. Now our unit cost has been raised to Rs.14/= per unit and
the CEB planners hope that by year 2015, when the first phase of the
Norochchole plant is in full operation, we would recover the losses
incurred by the electricity generation.
When our planners designed coal plants for Sri Lanka in early 1990s,
coal was very cheap and the plant cost also remained comparatively very
low. But as the oil production capacity reached its maximum limits, coal
was naturally treated as the complementary source of energy, specially
to generate electricity. During the two decades from 1990 to 2010, the
consumption of coal had increased, resulting in a series of exorbitant
price escalation for coal. So it cannot be considered a wise decision
for us to have changed into coal as a solution to our growing energy
demands. As one analyst had clearly shown, if we were to use coal as our
main electricity generation source, the average unit cost would be
Rs.30/= per unit for the coming 30 years time. This will clearly show
that coal is not cheap and not clean either.
If we look at the carbon footprint or direct CO2 emission to generate
one unit of electricity (Kwhr) coal emits nearly 1000 grams of CO2,
whereas natural gas or LNG emits 450gm, oil emits 600gm, solar PV 32gm
and wind-mills emits 9gm respectively. If we compare consumption of
water per mega watt hour, coal needs 1485 - 2475 litres, gas plants need
531-904 litres, solar PV about "0" (zero) litres, wind about "0" (zero)
litres respectively. So, if we incorporate all the factors, the real
cost, CO2 emission, water usage, emission of sulphur and residue ashes,
coal is not cheap and clean as mentioned earlier.
On the other hand, you could not be able to export goods and services
which are being produced by coal power electricity due to the proposed
green tariffs which are to be imposed by the western countries in time
to come.
Therefore, we have no alternative but to improve our renewable energy
sector, as early as possible. It has been identified that we have, 726Mw
of mini hydro potential with another 300Mw of large scale hydro power
projects. In pursuance to the feasibility studies that need to be
carried out to ascertain the most suitable alternate or supplementary
sources of energy, solar and wind capacity maps have already been
prepared. Although, these are considered to be very costly exercises,
one cannot help the authorities leaving no stone unturned. However, as a
tropical country our main source of energy should be biomass. Our slogan
should be "grow our energy - grow our food".
(The writer is the Minister of Environment and Natural Resources)
|