Women come to the fore in politics
by Lal HEWAPATHIRANA
The International Women's Day was celebrated on March 8. Many
functions and celebrations were held to mark the occasion. As usual,
topics on equal rights, equal opportunities, women and violence, women
and conflicts, women and their working conditions, and more were widely
discussed by these interested in gender issues, including the champions
of reputed non-governmental Organisations, to the most humble leader in
a small women's society in the village. The following day, everything
that was discussed 24 hours earlier was forgotten by the advocates of
women's liberation and the women suffering due to abuse of their rights,
and as usual, the society returned to square one, as if nothing had
taken place on the previous day - the International Women's Day.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58ddb/58ddb1b6828ab94191cbafe01a918256f47fcabe" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b01cc/b01cc08b37a6d31e81c3d69726d1f3a1911db8ae" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffb99/ffb99d7da42e9743b3a26cf4cc9940333d6cc5d6" alt="" |
Sirimavo Bandaranaike |
Vivian Gunawardena |
Malini Fonseka |
Commencing in the USA, the world has been celebrating this important
day for 100 years. Fifteen years ago, an important women's conference
was held in Beijing, where thousand of important Sri Lankan women
participated to draw up a declaration and a plan of action to address
many important gender issues, with focus on positive advancement of the
status of women, who are denied their rights and privileges.
While new ground has been broken in some aspects of the issue during
the past five to six years through the sponsorship of the Government, it
is a pity that those women who were denied their rights questioned as to
why they have not become stakeholders of more tangible achievements
considered success stories of women's emancipation, even fifteen years
after the Beijing conference. Perhaps, the Non-Governmental Beijing
participants may have the answer.
However, in this backdrop, one voice was clearly heard on a highly
pertinent topic raised by one of our most illustrious women leaders,
during the United Nations International Women's Day celebrations held in
Colombo the former Vice Chancellor of the Colombo university, Prof.
Savithri Gunasekera. Prof. Gunasekera, without mincing words, said that
political representation of women in Sri Lanka must be significantly
increased to enhance their influence at the decision making level.
She deplored that when compared with other countries, Sri Lanka lacks
women's participation in the field of politics. This perception of the
professor is important, because she was referring to the women's
participation as members of parliament to advance the cause of women.
The professor is probably aware that from time immemorial, women have
been in the forefront of campaigns to elect their male counterpart to
parliament. Her statement is pertinent as we are about to exercise our
right to franchise and elect our representatives next month.
If we examine the list of women Members of Parliament since 1947 we
come across only a few names of those who were elected to the Parliament
due to their own virtues, interest, active participation in politics and
true grassroots level leadership. Adeline Molamure, the wife of the
first Speaker in the first Parliament was the first women MP, and she
was heavily involved in the political activities of UNP Women's League.
Later elected to parliament were Clodagh Jayasuriya (UNP), Florence
Senanayake, Vivian Gunawardena, Kusuma Gunawardena, Thamara Kumari
Illangaratne, Soma Wickremanayake and Kusuma Rajaratne and a few others.
Though some of them were the wives of the sitting MPs, the important
fact was that they were elected by the people due to their own
performance by being engaged in local level politics, and for having
contributed vigorously towards the vision of their political parties.
According to data, none of these women parliamentarians seems to have
contributed anything substantial to upgrade the status of the women's
community of Sri Lanka, apart from promoting their political party
ideologies and securing the votes for themselves at the expense of the
poor women, living in slums and shanties or employed in rubber tapping
or tea plucking or working in factories.
The first phase of the Mahinda Chintana which President Mahinda
Rajapaksa presented at the Presidential Election in 2005, stressed the
need for some positive steps to support in upgrading the standard of the
disadvantage women. Coupled with the themes of growth and security for
children, all women were to receive adequate social and legal protection
not only for their rights, but for their well being as well. Through the
Ministry of Child Development and Women's Empowerment many unexplored
areas were targeted and considerable success was achieved in terms of
the general uplift of the status of women in some identified areas while
much more is in the pipeline.
The trend is being continued with greater vigour and foresight under
the phase two of Mahinda Chintana.
On the point raised by Prof. Savithri Gunasekera, regarding provision
of opportunities for more women to work at decision making level in the
Parliament as MPs, it is sad to note that Sri Lanka had the lowest
percentage of women MPs in parliament which was dissolved recently a
mere 5.6 percent with 13 women MPs - when compared with other countries
in South Asia, except Bangladesh. Ironically, population-wise there are
more women than men in Sri Lanka now, and women voters exceed 50
percent. A healthy percentage of at least 10 percent of women MPs in the
new Parliament would do justice to the cause of women in the country, in
terms of fairness and justice.
Sri Lanka will then enjoy some respectable status among its South
Asian colleagues, as India has only 8.8 percent and Nepal only 5.8
percent. Pakistan has 20 percent. India is preparing to increase the
percentage to 33.
However, it is too late for us to anticipate more opportunities for
women in the next Parliament as all nominations have now been closed for
the general election next month and it is doubtful that all women who
contest will be elected. Nevertheless, there is room for satisfaction,
as all nomination lists filed by the major political parties contain
names of women aspiring to become MPs. If one were to make an analytical
guess, going by the nomination lists already filed, even the next
Parliament will hardly comprise at least 6 percent women MPs. By some
chance, if it does get 6 percent or more, all advocates of women's
rights should feel contented, for it will be history created in Sri
Lanka during President Rajapaksa's tenure, that the next Parliament will
have the highest percentage of women MPs, the majority representing the
UPFA, as all predictions and projections are for a UPFA landslide
victory.
There is, however, one practical solution that would help an
increased number of women MPs to represent the over 50 percent of the
women population in the country, if all party leaders are genuinely
interested and committed towards the progress and the forward march of
Sri Lankan women.
This is with reference to the National List, which the three leading
contending parties have already announced. Even though it is encouraging
to observe the names of some women in those lists, it should be said
that all leaders would have done better by increasing women
representation at least in the National Lists. History shows us that
these lists are, however subject to change which means if the leaders so
decide they could improve the existing lists. Our leaders, of course,
know how to set about as they have done it in the past.
A cursory look at the three National Lists concerned indicate that
there are only about nine names of women of the permitted 87, Of them
only four women are familiar in the electorate, namely, Swarna
Obeysekera (UNF), Malini Fonseka, Kamala Ranatunga (UPFA) and Swinitha
Weerasinghe (DNA). Swarna Obeysekera is well known for her role in
women's development in particular, and it is hoped that she will be
included in the UNF's final list, for she is one of those who can
represent women in Parliament effectively due to her wide experience in
the field of women and gender. (Malini Fonseka and Swinitha Weerasinghe
are film stars who have carried out the instructions of their directors
for the silver screen, only to make audiences happy.
Thus they live in a dream world far from reality, and still farther
away from the world of suffering women. Malini Fonseka could be well
recognised for her many feats and the international recognition she has
earned for the Sri Lankan cinema.
Kamala Ranatunga is the most versatile of the lot, with a very
convincing record of long and prestigious service in the fields of
women's politics as well as promotion of women's right through the
Women's Organisation of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party. Introduced to SLFP
politics by SWRD Bandaranaike himself in 1957, she contested elections
from the SLFP ticket and was elected as a SLFP women's representative to
the Western Provincial Council.
Since President Rajapaksa took over the reins of the SLFP, she has
been a tower of strength in the SLFP Women's Organisation working day
and night for the party to win elections.
Due to her oratorical skills, in verse and prose and being heavily
involved in politics, she has been one of the most sought after speakers
on SLFP platforms for several decades. Political rivals had subjected
her to violence on numerous occasions, and she was even remanded
following bogus complaints during UNP regimes. She has fought fearlessly
for over 53 years to promote the status of women in rural areas and to
politically educate them to take up social responsibilities. She is a
role model of a woman, who could champion the cause of women and women's
rights in any forum.
Faces and parties of women apart, the need is for more competent and
capable women to reach levels that would empower them to support gender
issues and promote women's right, where proper decisions on women's
issues could be made and legislation enacted, which in this country is
parliament.
Lal Hewapathirana is the former Director of World view Sri Lanka. He
is currently a consultant in Development Media and Communication.
|