54-million-year-old skull reveals surprises about early evolution of
primate brains
by Bill Kanapaux
Researchers at the Florida Museum of Natural History and the
University of Winnipeg have developed the first detailed images of a
primitive primate brain, unexpectedly revealing that cousins of our
earliest ancestors relied on smell more than sight.
The analysis of a well-preserved skull from 54 million years ago
contradicts some common assumptions about brain structure and evolution
in the first primates. The study, also narrows the possibilities for
what caused primates to evolve larger brain sizes.
The skull belongs to a group of primitive primates known as
Plesiadapiforms, which evolved in the 10 million years between the
extinction of the dinosaurs and the first traceable ancestors of modern
primates.
 |
This image shows a translucent
rendering of the brain as it would fit inside the skull of
the 54-million-year-old primitive primate, Ignacius
graybullianus. |
The 1.5-inch-long skull was found fully intact, allowing researchers
to make the first virtual mold of a primitive primate brain.
"Most explanations on the evolution of primate brains are based on
data from living primates," said lead author Mary Silcox, an
anthropologist at the University of Winnipeg and research associate at
the Florida Museum. "There have been all these inferences about what the
brains of the earliest primates would look like, and it turns out that
most of those inferences are wrong."
Researchers used CT scans to take more than 1,200 cross-sectional
X-ray images of the skull, which were combined into a 3-D model of the
brain.
"A large and complex brain has long been regarded as one of the major
steps that sets primates apart from the rest of mammals," said Florida
Museum vertebrate paleontologist and study co-author Jonathan Bloch. "At
our very humble beginnings, we weren't so special. That happened over
tens of millions of years."
The animal, Ignacius graybullianus, represents a side branch on the
primate tree of life, Bloch said. "You can think of it as a cousin of
the main line lineage that would have given rise ultimately to us."
Nose first
In previous research, Bloch and Silcox established that
Plesiadapiforms were transitional species. Ignacius was similar to
modern primates in terms of its diet and tree-dwelling but did not leap
from tree to tree like modern fast-moving primates.
In many ways, the early primate behaved like living primates but with
a brain that was one-half to two-thirds the size of the smallest modern
primates. This means factors such as tree-dwelling and fruit-eating can
be eliminated as potential causes for primates evolving larger brain
sizes, Silcox said, because "the smaller-brained Ignacius was already
doing those things."
The mould suggests a "startling combination" of features in the early
primate that requires a re-thinking of primate brain evolution, said
Florida State University anthropologist Dean Falk, who was not involved
in the study.
"Hypotheses about early primate brain evolution often link keen smell
with nocturnal insect-eating, and a more recently evolved increase in
visual processing with fruit-eating in arboreal habitats," Falk said.
The move to larger brain size occurred during an evolutionary burst
that happened 10 million years after the extinction of the dinosaurs. At
that point, visual features in the brain became more prominent while the
olfactory bulbs became proportionately smaller.
More than likely, Bloch said, this change in brain structure and size
was related to primates living in closed canopy forests that brought
trees closer together and allowed for more leaping. But answering that
will require the discovery and analysis of new fossils.
Changes in brain size and structure in the early stages of primate
evolution have generated enormous debates for decades. But until now,
fossil evidence has been lacking. Many models of the ancestral primate
brain are based on tree shrews, which come from Southeast Asia and are
distantly related to humans. But with some 70 million years of evolution
between them and humans, "it turns out tree shrew brains are not a good
model," Silcox said.
The early primate's brain had relatively large olfactory bulbs,
indicating the animal relied on smell rather than sight. "Being visually
directed is one of the things that is a primate characteristic, but we
can tell from the brain that's not something that came in right at the
base of primates but evolved later," Silcox said.
Detailed picture
The fossil record provides the best test of inferences about brain
evolution, but until recently, fossil evidence for primates has been
mostly limited to teeth and fragmented jaws. But in past two decades,
limestone deposits in Wyoming have yielded well-preserved skeletons and
skulls.
The CT scan technique has become an accepted method for fossil
studies but most often involves medical scanners that are re-purposed
for fossils.
By contrast, the primate brain study used a more powerful
industrial-strength high-resolution scanner at Penn State University.
Claire Dalmyn, an undergraduate student at the University of Winnipeg
and paper co-author, traced more than 800 X-ray images of the braincase.
The effort took nearly a year and produced one of the best endocasts
they had ever seen for an extinct mammal.
"I couldn't believe what we were seeing," Bloch said.
Primate brains tend to be dominated by cerebrum, the most highly
evolved part of the brain, making it difficult to look at functional
areas and forcing researchers to focus solely on brain size.
"Brain size is interesting, but it's quite difficult to interpret
because in one brain, 50 percent could be made up of olfactory bulbs,
and in another brain, 50 percent could be made up of visual processing
areas," Silcox said.
In the primitive primate, the cerebrum had not yet evolved to the
point where it covered all of the other functional regions of the brain.
As a result, the relative sizes of different parts of the brain
provide a better picture of brain function and the early stages of
primate evolution.
The specimen came from north central Wyoming, near the entrance to
Yellowstone National Park. The intact skull is a rare find that allowed
the primate to be studied this way for the first time, Silcox said.
"This is very exciting in terms of the history of paleo-neurology,
the history of the study of brains in the fossil record," Silcox said.
Courtesy: Natural History
|