Ramsar Convention at 41 shows new dimensions
When Donald Campbell broke the land speed record on 17 July 1964,
travelling 649 kilometres per hour across a parched desert landscape, he
likely climbed out of the specially designed Bluebird- Proteus CN7 car,
stepped out onto the salty ground, and took a deep breath of the dry
desert air.
There
were probably many things on his mind at that moment, but one thing
almost certainly wasn't: wetlands. It would have probably surprised him
to know that he was standing in one at that very moment.
As a dry salt flat, could the place where the land speed record was
broken someday be included on the List of Wetlands of International
Importance? It seems impossible, yet Australia's Lake Eyre Basin seems
to break records and rules.
Then again, the Convention on Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar
Convention) has always been a little different. While international
conventions often coalesce around action led by major states, the Ramsar
Convention arose from intense dialogue among three NGOs, namely the
International Union for Conservation of Nature, the International
Waterfowl Wetlands Research Bureau (now, Wetlands International) and the
International Council for Bird Preservation (now BirdLife
International).
During a 1962 conference in the area of French Camarque, the three
NGOs called for the creation of an international convention to address
the decrease in the world's wetlands and the associated threats to
waterfowl.
Eight technical meetings followed and, in 1971, 18 nations met in
Ramsar, Iran, to sign the Convention. Today, there are 160 signatories
to the Ramsar Convention and, as it celebrated its 40th anniversary last
year, it is clear that it has found lasting resonance in the global
community. A total of over 2,000 Ramsar sites now exist around the world
and cover over 1.9 million square kilometres.
More signatories, more sites, more activities. At the core of the
convention is its mission of promoting conservation and wise use of
wetlands "as a contribution towards achieving sustainable development
throughout the world". The heavy focus on the establishment of sites has
also been crucial, with each new signatory being required to designate
at least one wetland for inclusion on the Ramsar List at the time of its
accession. Few things remain unchanged after 41 years though, and the
Ramsar Convention is no exception.
The text of the Convention includes a strong focus on waterfowl and
their habitats, leading some people to believe that the Convention is
mostly about birds. Over the years, however, the Convention has evolved
and the scope of its activities has broadened.
A crucial development started in the mid-1990s at the Sixth
Conference of the Parties (COP) to the Ramsar Convention held in
Brisbane, Australia, as focus shifted away from simple wetland
management for waterfowl. At COP 7 in San Jose, Costa Rica, increasing
focus was placed on issues such as integrated river basin management and
improving environmental quality in waters. By COP 8, held in Spain in
2002, a suite of new issues emerged under the umbrella of Ramsar, namely
water allocation, climate change and wetlands, integrated coastal zone
management, and the cultural value of wetlands.
From "wetlands for birds" to "water for people"This expansion in the
range of issues being considered by the parties to the Ramsar Convention
is perhaps evidence of a deeper understanding that humankind and
communities are inextricably linked with the health of the wetlands that
surround them. The ecosystem services provided by wetlands have shaped
human civilisation from its earliest stages.
Water is one of the most critical environmental issue in the world
today, and, if anything, it will only grow in importance as the global
population expands and the forecast effects of climate change generate
increasingly unpredictable and severe weather patterns.Indeed, the
increased societal demands on wetlands - as a source of drinking water,
food, transportation, hydropower, etc. - means that even if the parties
to the Ramsar Convention wanted to limit its focus exclusively to
waterfowl habitats, there would be no feasible way to ignore the
communities surrounding these ecosystems and their basic needs. It
therefore seems both reasonable and useful that the Ramsar Convention
has broadened its scope to consider these issues in a more holistic
sense. - Our World
|