An outstanding director from Hong Kong
In some of my earlier columns I had discussed the work of a number of
important Chinese filmmakers such as Chen Kaige, Zhang Yomou (China),
Wong Kar-wai (Hong Kong), Hou Hsiao-hsien and Edward Yang (Taiwan).I
have had the privilege of meeting all of them.
In today’s column I wish to discuss the cinema of another Hong Kong
film maker who has made a deep impression both nationally and
internationally - Stanley Kwan. He is a Hong Kong filmmaker who has
imaginatively extended the discourse of cinema both in terms of content
and style. We in Sri Lanka can learn a great deal from his innovative
creations.
A number of filmmakers from Hong Kong have succeeded in imparting a
new vitality, sense of purpose and direction to Hong Kong cinema.
Stanley Kwan is one of them. He joins the galaxy of a number of other
famous directors such as Ann Hui, Allen Fong, John Woo, Tsui Hark, Wong
kar-wai, Fruit Chan, Johnny To, who have shaped the forward vectors of
Hong Kong cinema in interesting ways. Staney Kwan was born in 1957 in
Hong Kong.
Communications
He studied communications at Hong Kong Baptist University. After
graduation he found employment as a production assistant in the Hong
Kong Television Broadcast Company. In 1979, he left the station and
began work as an assistant director to such highly esteemed directors as
Ann Hui, peter young, Patrick Tam, Yim Ho and Ronnie Yu.
At the age of twenty-seven, in 1984, Kwan directed his first feature
film titled Women. This is a film that seeks to explore the lives and
loves of a number of career women. It is the intention of the filmmaker
to focus on the psychological complexities associated with the lives of
women in modern societies. Evidently, the weight of despair that is
invariably attached to the lives of these women is an area of great
interest to Kwan. Some film critics thought that the film was too
male-centered to do full justice to the chosen theme of the director.
Successful
In 1986 Stanley Kwan made a film titled Love Unto Waste. This was
indeed a much more accomplished work of cinematic art. The true talents
of Kwan as a film director begin to make their unmistakable presence in
this film. Kwan sees this film as among his most successful.
Film directors, as a general rule, select materials for their work
from the worlds that they are most familiar with and transform these
into memorable cinematic experience using all the resources available.
Love Unto Waste clearly bears testimony to this fact. Once again it is
the sad predicaments of women that engage Stanley Kwan’s deepest
interests.
This work, in many ways, reminds one of Federico Fellini’s great work
of cinema La Strada. As in that work, the idea of decadence and the
complex ways in which inflects human behavior is pivotal to the
narrative discourse of live unto waste.
Two years later,’ Stanley Kwan made what I think is his most
memorable film, Rouge. It is indeed a film that has delighted
international audiences with its unusual narrative and vivid visual
registers. Rouge is based on a novel of the same name by Li Bihua.
He is an author who has written about a dozen popular novels that owe
their vitality to the Chinese literary tradition. This film contains two
topics that characterise traditional Chinese literature – the ghost
story and the encounters between literary scholars and courtesans. The
film, by means of a series of carefully designed flashbacks, recounts
the tragic fate of a couple – the rich and flamboyant Chan, who is also
referred to as the twelfth master and the beautiful courtesan.
They are deeply in love; however they cannot marry because of staunch
opposition from the families. Therefore, they resolve to commit suicide
by swallowing poisoned opium. She dies and he survives, Rouge succeeds
in capturing the opulence as well as the decadence of Hong Kong of 1930s
with remarkable narrative energy and visual power. The background to the
story provides an attractive setting in which the practices and rituals,
the romance and he suicide, can be represented exotically but credibly.
Images
The juxtaposition of memorably dramatic images reconfigures for us a
in all its hypnotic power the face of Hong Kong some eight decades ago.
In many ways the more important part of the story takes place in
contemporary Hong Kong; here the host of the dead woman decides ti come
back to Hong Kong from the other world in search of her lover. All of a
sudden, she materialises in a newspaper office to place a notice, and
this arrival leads to an unanticipated intervention in the lives of a
journalist and his girlfriend with unplanned consequences.
The way realism and fantasy interacts in this film is largely
responsible for its popular appeal. In addition, the blending of the
past and the present, the natural and supernatural, gives the film its
distinctive texture and imaginative reach. What invests Rouge with a
special resonance is the conviction that the past inhabits the present
just as much as the supernatural inhabits the natural. Stanley Kwan, it
seems to me, adroitly introduces the idea of a film-within a film, with
all the artifice of popular culture evoked imaginatively to underline
its constructedness another interesting facet of this film is the way in
which it focuses on the contested and fissured cultural space of modern
Hong Kong. Unlike in the original novel, which focuses largely on the
supernatural, the film seeks to call attention to the strangeness in the
natural.
What is interesting to note is that one of the most popular in
fantastic genres in the Chinese tradition of story-telling is deployed
to depict the complexities associated with the cultural space of modern
Hong Kong.
Rouge, then, is an imaginative and stylish film that has generated a
great deal of interest both among local and international audiences.
What is remarkable about this film by Stanley Kwan is the play of
imagination that orchestrates with a light, but deft. touch the apparent
irreconcilables, the sworn enemies, of realism and fantasy; past and
present, melodrama and gravitas and natural and supernatural.
It is evident that the author of this film is keen to shuttle back
and forth between two distinctly different cultural worlds – the Hong
Kong of 1930s and that of 1980s – yet the two places are connected by a
single minded and well-focused quest. Stanley Kwan’s gift for
establishing the feel of place and atmosphere through the adroitly
controlled flow of images adds immeasurably to the power of the film.
Exploration
In 1989, Kwan made another widely-discussed film, not necessarily in
positive terms, Full Moon in New York. Kwan has always displayed a
predilection and flair for selecting new areas for cinematic exploration
with each new film. He once remarked that he has been influenced by Ann
Hui’s admonition that, ‘a director should treat each of the films he
makes as the last chance given in experimenting with filmmaking.’
Full Moon in New York, to my mind, is not an accomplished work of
cinema in the way that Rouge was. It had many deficiencies. Commenting
on his film, Kwan said that, ‘my fourth film was a project assigned to
me by an independent producer who had lined up three famous actresses
from Hong Kong, Taiwan, and mainland china for a Chinatown story. I feel
deeply for the Chinese who have migrated.They will always feel anguished
about being Chinese. Despite the fact that they will never return,
leading a better life overseas, they cannot forget the past and nothing
is forgiven.’
Full moon in New York enters into the space of cross-cultural
interaction. The need for cultural adjustment, the importance of
cultural identity and its problematic nature, and the salience of
notions of freedom and memory play a significant role in the cinematic
discourse. Three characters from China, Taiwan and Hong Kong meet in New
York and they become friends. These three women, it is apparent, share
very little in common except their obvious Chineseness. As the film
progresses, we become aware of the fact that even this is more
problematic and complicated than one would have anticipated. In a way,
the three women are intrigued by the new environment in which they find
themselves, and they interact more with that setting than with each
other. Although they seem to exult in the new found freedom, emotional
as well as sexual, the imperatives of being a Chinese and the diverse
ways in which Chineseness has been inflected in their respective
homelands, have been emphasized throughout the film, giving the film its
energy and direction.
The tension and the urgency of the cinematic discourse are in part
derived from this fact. Although the experience itself clearly contains
many possibilities, and incipient narrative trajectories, the director
has opted not to follow the deepest insights of this problematic. Had
the director chosen to pursue this line of activity more resolutely, it
is my judgment, that this film would have been a much greater work of
cinematic art. However, the director’s desire to explore a novel area of
experience should be lauded.
Maturity
In 1991 Kwan made Centre Stage, a film that to my mind reflects his
growing maturity of outlook and his sensitive deployment of the medium
of cinema. Center Stage was honoured with the Golden Horse Award at the
Taipei film festival. This film is very different from Kwan’s earlier
creations. It represents the amalgamation of the documentary and the
fictional. At a deeper level of artistic apprehension, however, one
finds in it a number of discursive threads that run throughout Kwan’s
work; an extreme sensitivity to nuances if interpersonal relations, the
despair and suffering that seems to be endemic to female experiences,
the quest for newer understandings of human living and a desire to
provide society with compelling reflections of itself.
Centre Stage narrates the short and famous life of Ruan Lingyu,
possibly the most well-known star of Chinese silent cinema. It is
evident that the director has chosen to blend fact and fiction,
documentary and narrative styles, in order to present to us a more
complex awareness of this actress and the demands of her time. Black and
white footage of the director and his cast talking about their roles and
their valuations are interpolated with the basic narrative of the
actresses life.
However, it is important to note that there is a kind of role
reversal in the employment of documentary and narrative. What we see is
how the fictional or narrative segments recounting the known facts of
her life while it is the documentary segment that provides us with
elements of speculation.
Sensitivity
Ruan, who was generally regarded as Greta Garbo of China, brought a
special aura of sensitivity and sensuality to her depictions of tragic
characters. Her own personal life, in many ways, manifested the tragic
experiences embodied by the characters whom she portrayed. In 1935, at
the young age of twenty five, force of circumstances led to her suicide.
A dark despair and insurmountable pain pervaded her life. Given the
prestige she enjoyed and the tragedy of her life, it is scarcely
surprising that she became a compelling subject for cinematic
representation. In Centre Stage, however, Kwan has given the story as we
know it a new inflection. Centre Stage, it has to be emphasized,
constitutes an audacious attempt in its desire to incorporate
documentary footage into the flow of narrative.
The self-reflexivity, introspection and the imaginative amalgamation
of forms serve to lend the experience a depth of perception and critical
distance, as it faces up to certain dominant and ingrained ambivalences
of society. The skillful and inspired performance by Maggie Cheung as
Ruan adds greatly to the final impact of the film.
Despite the fact that Centre Stage clearly seeks to present the
biography of Ruan, the aim of the director extends far beyond that; in
fact, one can discern a larger ambition in the film. Stanley Kwan is
keen to investigate cinematically into the complex and unanticipated
ways in which legends, particularly those associated with public
performers and celebrities are produced and circulated in society,
highlighting certain deeply –formed desires. Centre Stage, in my
judgment, is a mature, intelligent, insightful film that bears witness
to the talents of a film director who is in full possession of his
powers.
The next film of Kwan was Red Rose White Rose. In this film, the
director was seeking to explore feminine psychology guided by his own
definite views on the subject. The film is based in a well-known story
by the celebrated writer Eileen Chan, and the story as it is told in the
film bears the distinct imprint of Kwan’s personal vision of feminine
sensibility. Red Rose White Rose went on to win five awards at the
golden horse film festival in Taiwan and was nominated for the golden
ear award at the 1995 Berlin film festival. Through the narrative and
observations rendered by a male voice, the film aims at exploring
psychological dimensions of Chinese femininity. However, the
interpretive trajectory of this work moves more in the direction of
Freud than traditional Chinese understandings.
Objective
Stanley Kwan has said that, in making this film, his objective was to
provide audiences with a new vision of femininity. He feels that the
idea of femininity has been distorted in traditional Chinese culture.
As the film unfolds we begin to recognise the fact that red rose
stands for male sexual fantasy and white rose for the social and
familial role expected of a wife in traditional Chinese culture; they
are now converted into two psychoanalytic facets of femininity. It is
Kwan’s intention to put into ply a new understanding of human
relationships.
It is interesting to note that Stanley Kwan in an interview
maintained that all of his films are centrally concerned with the
re-envisioning of human relationships in their most raw and
unembroidered ways.
In this regard, he says openly that he has been influenced by the
great Japanese film director Yasujiro Ozu – the author of such films as
Tokyo Story, Late Spring, Early Summer and An Autumn Afternoon.
It has to be stated that in Stanley Kwan’s films, there is in
evidence a rare intelligence, and human empathy and boldness of outlook
that are wholly admirable and that go to form his cinematic signature.
The deep concord between form and content which is not always evident to
a superficial gaze, the stylistic hybridity which releases energy, the
calculated counterposition of feeling and moral imagination, the
constant focus on the predicament of women are distinctive features that
mark his cinema.
Kwan is the author of about 13 films. In this column, I chose to
focus on four of them, mostly associated with his early phase, that
allow us to probe his distinctive ambitions and achievement; these films
reflect his directorial preoccupations as well as the stylistic
innovations he introduced to Hong Kong cinema. Each of his films is
different from the previous one, thereby manifesting his innovative
tendencies and experimental agenda. Through these diverse films, winds a
readily identifiable pattern that is linked to the imaginative and
sympathetic probing into the suffering of women. This consistency has
the effect of generating a moral admiration for his work.
In one sense, it can be plausibly argued that Stanley Kwan’s films
are moral chronicles in which private anguishes have their public
reverberations. Indeed, it is on women characters, throughout his films,
that he has chosen to bestow his most memorable cinematic care. And it
is those episodes and sequences that underscore the privations and
dilemmas of women that command the greatest authority; in these
instances one observes how he has succeeded in exhibiting his complex
representational energies to the greatest effect.
Desideratum
The troubling and inescapable truths of life need cinematic
witnesses, and Stanley Kwan has stepped forward as one who can fulfil
this desideratum most effectively. What he has consistently aimed to do,
even in those works that do not quite reach his intended mark, is to
offer complex re-articulations of human problems and predicaments whose
full force we often fail to recognise through lack of empathy and
understanding. Through these means, one can say that Kwan has been able
to sponsor a cultural diagnosis that is allied to a deep moral
imagination and that avoids undue simplifications.
Earlier on I commented on the importance of Kwan’s film Centre Stage.
One of way of contextualizing its significance is by locating it in the
tradition of documentary filmmaking in Hong Kong. Despite the salience
of films such as leaving in sorrow and sunless days, there has not been
a vigorous tradition of documentary filmmaking in Hong Kong, although
the last few years have seen some change.
It seems to me that one useful way of understanding the significance
of Kwan’s centre stage is by situating it in the documentary tradition
of filmmaking in Hong Kong. Until he made this film, he was primarily
interested in feature films with a marked emphasis on emotionally
charged narratives. In that sense, centre stage signifies a new
direction for him. This film, it can be said, was different from the
generality of Hong Kong films. The way the resources and the
representational strategies of the documentary were mobilised by Stanley
Kwan testifies to his innovative cast o mind.
Film scholar
In this regard I wish to call attention to the eminent film scholar
and my former colleague at the University of Hong Kong, Mette Hjort.
’Kwan’s ingenious insistence in centre stage on the dynamics of belief
and, more specifically, on the problems of distinguishing between
unfounded and justifiable beliefs, was to make elements of documentary
form salient in ways that were groundbreaking in Hong Kong by virtue of
the absence of a vigorous documentary tradition, and certainly of
documentary filmmaking in a reflexive or poetic vein.
And these same elements would certainly define centre stage as an
innovative work within the largely transnational framework of the
biopic’s characteristic genre formulae.’ Stanley Kwan, it seems to me,
is a highly talented filmmaker who is unafraid to chart new territories
for cinematic representation. We in Sri Lanka can learn some valuable
lessons from his efforts. |