'Those with vested interests should not deter parliamentary process'
By Uditha Kumarasinghe

Deputy Speaker Chandima Weerakkody
|
Deputy Speaker Chandima Weerakkody said it is important for a country
to have a judiciary that sets an example. If somebody is trying to
prolong a process by various tactics, they are directly or indirectly
trying to bring disrepute to the country in the eyes of the
international community.
The Deputy Speaker told the Sunday Observer that the Sri Lankan
Constitution is not the only Constitution in which Parliament has power
to hear allegations against a Chief Justice, Supreme Court Judge or
Court of Appeal Judge. There are similar provisions in other
Constitutions as well. Therefore as citizens, we have to be mindful of
our conduct.There are so many who are looking at us and waiting to
obstruct our way forward. These are all third parties who have gone to
Courts. What is their ulterior motive? There is a forum created by the
Constitution of this country. They should not try to halt proceedings of
that forum to gain various hidden benefits.
I believe a majority of the people who resort to such conduct will
realize that they should not attempt to halt this process. It is
important as citizens, we have to respect the existing law of the
country.
We have to think of the country not personal gains. Anybody should
not attempt to twist and turn things for personal benefits.
He said as a citizen of this country, we are a duty bound by the
nation to respect the existence and co-existence of a system.
When we look at the Articles of the Constitution, specially Article 4
where judicial authority of Parliament is exercised through Courts,
tribunals and other institutions. It refer to matters regarding
Parliamentary privilege, immunity and power of Parliament. According to
the law, Parliament may exercise jurisdiction directly.
The authority of the Speaker to appoint a Select Committee to look
into allegations stipulated in an impeachment against the Chief Justice
is derived from Articles in the Constitution.
It is defined as the power of Parliament. It is the Parliament that
has the power to hear an impeachment as per the provisions of the
Constitution. It is clear, if we look at Article 107 of the
constitution, it has set out very clearly as to how the proceedings
should take place. It refers and sets out the procedure as the law
created by Parliament or Standing Orders. There are Standing Orders for
this purpose. It is clear that the Parliament has the ultimate
authority.
The Deputy Speaker said that there is also a case law of Victor Ivan
Vs former Chief Justice Sarath N. Silva whereby Victor Ivan filed a
fundamental rights application expecting the removal of a judge. In that
case, it has been clearly set out in Article 107 of the Constitution of
the removal of a judge. It says " Article 107 (2) provides for the
procedure of removing a judge on the grounds of 'proved misbehaviour or
incapacity' this is the only way in which a judge who is in office could
be removed." As per Justice Wadugodapitiya mentioned in this Supreme
Court judgment, "It seems to me that upon a proper construction of
paragraphs (2) and (3) of Article 107 and upon the authority of various
dicta cited above, that is quite clear that paragraphs (2) and (3) of
Article 107 of the Constitution provide the only way in which the Chief
Justice (1st respondent) could be removed from office." Justice
Wadugodapitiya has also further stated "In the circumstances, the Court
has no jurisdiction in proceedings under Article 126 of the Constitution
to grant the declaration prayed for by the petitioners." So there is law
and Supreme Court judgment to substantiate that position."With all that,
I believe a third party coming to Courts to block this process or
prolong this process would damage Sri Lanka. There are allegations
against the Chief Justice.
The Chief Justice's position is that she is clean. It has to be fair
by her and we must allow her to explain and clear herself from those
allegations as she has indicated. If we don't probe that, the so-called
international community will say our judiciary is corrupt. We must think
as a country and expeditiously give opportunity for the Chief Justice to
clear herself if she can."
The next meeting of the Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) on the
impeachment of the Chief Justice will be held on December 04.
There was a Supreme Court recommendation issued on Thursday that is
prudent that the sittings of the PSC to probe the allegation of the CJ
to be differed until a determination is arrived on the matter. But my
personal view is that first of all, we have to think as Sri Lankans.
We are a country that is moving forward after 30 years of terrorism.
At present, we have a strong Government. We have no other major
obstacles which has hindered development, advancement of democracy or
improve the living standards of the people.
The country is moving forward in every other field. To realise our
goals, we should have a system which is running smoothly. We must also
be able to honour and respect the authority that is vested with every
institution by the provisions of the Constitution, the Deputy Speaker
said.
|