Integrating industry into Indian supply chains - 'vital for growth'
Integrating the Sri Lankan industry into the Indian supply chains is
the best option for fast growth, said Dr. Sirimal Abeyratne.
Based on a study he conducted for the Pathfinder Foundation, Dr.
Abeyratne said that Sri Lanka has little integration into production
processes in India and exports of manufactured 'parts and components' to
India is insignificant because India does not have globalised supply
chains.
 |
Dr Sirimal Abeyratne |
According to Dr. Abeyratne, an integration of countries into a supply
chain of a commodity at its different stages of production is a
fast-growing modern phenomenon. International trade is no longer
dominated by 'old-style' trade patterns because of the fragmentation of
production across countries and the formation of global supply chains.
The production and supply of parts and components by countries and
then assembling the final product in another country, is a phenomenon
that has been growing rapidly in the East and the South East Asian
region since the 1980s and thereafter spreading across the world.
This new facet of globalisation has been made possible by liberal
policy reforms, technological changes in production processes, and the
decline in transport and communication costs, that has allowed countries
to find best locations for production of parts and components leading to
globalised supply chains and to enhance mutual benefits of integration.
At a glance, anyone would think that if the Sri Lankan industry is
entering into global supply chains, the most attractive market, for many
reasons, would be in India. All factors underlying economic relations
between Sri Lanka and India remain strong in favour of deeper
integration. The biggest and fast-growing market within close proximity,
bilateral free-trade established through Indo-Lanka Free Trade Agreement
(FTA), the biggest trading partner of the country, the biggest source
market for travel and tourism, port and airport services, and in some
years even for direct investment and historical links beyond economic
spheres.
The studies, however, show quite paradoxically that Sri Lanka's trade
with its neighbouring countries in the South Asian region continued to
remain marginal. With over a decade of experience under the bilateral
Indo-Lanka Free Trade Agreement (FTA), one would anticipate
well-established and fast-growing economic integration between the two
countries.
Despite the greater scope for deeper integration in merchandise
trade, investment and trade in services between the two countries, the
studies portray a slow and lopsided pace of transformation.
After the implementation of the Indo-Lanka FTA in 2000, trade
expansion during the first half of the decade (2000-2005) was
remarkable.
On average annual exports grew by over 300 percent and imports by
nearly 200 percent. During the second half of the decade (2005-2010),
exports contracted by 2.7 percent, while imports grew only by 12.8
percent, presumably due to both internal policy changes and external
shocks.
In spite of all the good things, surprisingly the study finds that
the Sri Lankan integration into the manufacturing processes in India is
rather weak. The findings were based on a classification of trade data
into different categories: finished goods, raw materials, parts and
components and capital goods.
The most important commodity category entering the supply chains is
the export of parts and components which accounts for only seven percent
of Sri Lanka's total exports to India, while it is also overwhelmingly
concentrated in two categories, rubber tyres and some machinery items.
While Sri Lanka also exports a smaller share of capital goods
(machinery), over 20 percent of Sri Lanka's exports to India still
exhibit 'old-style' raw material supply. In fact, the Indian
manufacturing processes seems to have made little changes in terms of
expanding into a globalised production processes unlike the case of
labour-abundant China and other countries in East and South East Asia.
This is confirmed by India's total import mix from the world in which
raw materials account for 45 percent and parts and components only six
percent.
The nature and the degree of Sri Lanka's integration into the Indian
supply chains is a result of supply-side factors in Sri Lanka and the
demand-side factors in India. These factors that need to be analysed at
both ends encompassing the level of economic progress, trade and
development policies, the nature and the degree of trade facilitation,
and the cross-country differences in comparative advantages.
This means that as Dr. Abeyratne concludes the mere 'tariff-free'
trade regime established under the Indo-Lanka FTA would not be
sufficient, while even the FTAs implemented in the context of rising
protectionism could be detrimental.
GW
|