|
|
 |
 |
| Sunday, 23 March 2003 |
 |
|
 |
Features |  |
| News Business Features Editorial
|
'Live on TV' - openness or propaganda? NEW YORK, Saturday (AFP) - For the first time in history, television networks are carrying simultaneous broadcasts of an ongoing military offensive, but a new and more subtle form of disinformation may lie behind the "live on TV" spectacle of war in Iraq, some experts fear. For the past two days, viewers around the world have had access to real time images of fighter planes launching sorties from US aircraft carriers and blinding explosions as cruise missiles pound targets in Baghdad. They have seen columns of tanks and armoured carriers advancing relentlessly across the desert scrubland as the US-British invasion force fans out across southern Iraq. While presenters go into raptures over the stream of images from the front-line, the New York Times noted Friday that the television networks had carried more live war coverage in 24 hours than in the whole of the 1991 Gulf War. It has all come about thanks to the invention of the videophone, a telephone system which can transmit images of mediocre but broadcastable quality, and the decision of the Pentagon to allow some 500 journalists to accompany combat troops. But US media-watchers and campaigners for impartial reporting are concerned that all may not be what it seems. "It's a total orchestration. They know that television needs pictures, characters. It's about story-telling, it's Hollywood," said Danny Schechter of the internet site Mediachannel.org which specialises in scrutiny of the media. "This is a new level of manipulation, that conceals it's own intention.". "The Pentagon is running the public relations in this war they way it would run a political campaign. And the whole idea of a political campaign is always create photo-ops, action situations in which your candidate looks good," he said. "You identify with the troops, with their problems, and therefore you identify with the mission. They don't question the mission anymore." Schechter's comments were echoed by Rachel Coen, an analyst with Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR), an NGO which monitors the media and its activity. Coen acknowledged that televised coverage of the conflict in Iraq was turning up new information, but she warned that appearances can be deceptive. "Seeing the picture of a tank rolling into the desert may give the viewer a feeling that they have an inside track to the war and know the inside scoop, but in reality, it doesn't convey very much information," she said. |
|
News | Business | Features
| Editorial | Security Produced by Lake House |
