Sunday, 19 October 2003 |
Features |
News Business Features |
Correction An article in the Sunday Observer of October 28 titled "Learning to co-exist" stated that 'SLWCS argued that community integrated or participatory conservation projects mean working for villagers rather than with villagers'. This sentence should have read: "The SLWCS understands that it can not simply talk about 'community integrated' or 'participatory' conservation projects where they work 'for' villagers rather than 'with' villagers". The error is regretted. |
|
News | Business | Features
| Editorial | Security Produced by Lake House |