The return to madness
after four years of temporary sanity:
An Interventionist Tribute to Kethesh Loganathan
by Rajan Philips
'Sri Lanka: Lost Opportunities' is the title of an important book on
Sri Lanka's national question. The good man who wrote that book in 1995,
Kethesh Loganathan, has fallen victim to yet another lost opportunity to
give priority to finding a political solution to the national question.
What began euphemistically as a 'humanitarian' dispute over water has
now become a full scale war. Several hundreds have been killed, almost a
lakh of people are displaced, local and foreign NGO workers have been
killed or threatened, and even the High Commissioner for Pakistan has
been targeted.
Kethesh Loganathan joins a long list of Tamils killed by Tamils over
political differences. The killing of Tamil intellectuals and political
leaders has become a predictable crime of the LTTE. Government spokesmen
have called on the international community to stop the LTTE from future
killings. The international community has done more than its part. The
banning of the LTTE in India and several Western countries is a direct
result of the LTTE's violation of the most basic of human rights: LIFE.
EU statement
The recent EU statement condemns the killing of Loganathan and makes
it clear that the EU will not lift its ban until the LTTE stops such
killings. Significantly, the EU did not indicate the LTTE's ongoing
battles with the Sri Lankan army as a reason for continuing the ban. The
international community seems to be adopting a neutral position in the
battles between the LTTE and the army, apart from calling on both sides
to stop fighting and start talking.
Will the Sri Lankan government deliver on this expectation? Or will
it again turn a deaf ear to this call of the international community
just as the LTTE always turns a deaf ear to calls for observance of the
human rights of Tamils and Muslims?
'Devolve or die', wrote Dayan Jayatilleke. 'Die rather than devolve'
seems to be the motto of the JVP and the JHU who are now in the saddle
riding the State to war.
'Self-rule and shared rule', opined Kethesh Loganathan. He joined the
Government Peace Secretariat to work towards that goal. That the JVP and
the JHU should be allowed to usurp the government agenda for their own
ends is a betrayal of Kethesh Loganathan and everything that he stood
for and hoped to achieve through the Peace Secretariat.
What is conveniently forgotten in the lamentations for Loganathan and
those who preceded him is that everyone of them, in their different
ways, not only stood up to the LTTE but also stood up for the Tamils
against the unitary state. The LTTE's human crime of killing is blatant
and is readily condemned, but the government's political crime of not
doing anything to change the unitary state is rarely mentioned and is
easily ignored.
With a macabre sense of timing, Kethesh Loganathan was killed on the
anniversary of Lakshman Kadirgamar's assassination. But I must say that
Kethesh Loganathan was different from all others before him because he
was a rare, if not the only, member of his social milieu to actually
become a member of one of the Tamil militant organizations that sprouted
after 1977. Each organization has had its bourgeois or notable fellow
travellers and benefactors at home and abroad, but few of them crossed
the line and became members of these organizations.
Kethesh was not only the son of C. Loganathan, a charming Colombo
Tamil socialite and the first Ceylonese national to head the Bank of
Ceylon, but also the nephew of C. Tharmakulasingham, C. Loganathan's
younger brother, lawyer, and an LSSP stalwart in Point Pedro whose
untimely death deprived the LSSP of a leader of potential national
prominence but based in the North. C. Loganathan was proud that Kethesh
was taking after his uncle in taking to politics.
More than his pedigree Kethesh was unique for his disinterested
commitment to the cause of peace, which he understood as being not only
the absence of war but also the assurance of justice and equality for
Sri Lanka's minorities in a federal structure. I say 'disinterested'
because he did not see politics and the peace process as launching pads
for fame and career. He did not join the Peace Secretariat to embellish
his CV but to do something positive and did so against the advice of
many about his own security. To the end he stubbornly preferred the
obscurity of his suburban residence to the panoply of state protection.
The critic
Kethesh Loganathan (KL) was critical of the Norwegian designed peace
process because it did not protect the Tamils who did not agree with the
LTTE from being killed by the LTTE. In fact, he agonised over this
lacuna. But he did not entertain any illusion that peace could be
achieved in Sri Lanka without negotiating with the LTTE. For him peace
process meant neither the appeasement of the LTTE nor a military
engagement with it. Finally, he urged the need for a southern consensus
on a federal solution as the necessary premise for negotiating with the
LTTE.
Like many others, KL went further and blamed the Norwegians for all
these shortcomings. In my view, the Norwegians have been made the
scapegoat for the failure of the government and opposition leaders in
the South to take advantage of the peace process and the ceasefire
agreement, reach consensus between them, and bring diplomatic and
international pressure to bear on the LTTE.
It is fair to say that KL did not join the Peace Secretariat to be a
party to restarting the war. But once the war restarted he was reduced
to a co-opted Tamil who had no input or relevance to government decision
making that was all about war and nothing about peace, let alone
devolution.
The least the government can do now to honour the memory of Kethesh
Loganathan, Neelan Tiruchelvam, Lakshman Kadirgamar and everyone else
who paid with their lives for Tamil democracy and Sri Lankan federalism
is to unilaterally set about federalising the state and creating
international pressure on the LTTE to accept both.
|