Lankan farmers become prisoners of land and fellow humans
by Ranil Senanayake
In 1998 a meeting of farmers convened by the CGIAR to ascertain the
farmers viewpoint in agricultural development sent the following
statement. (CGIAR stands for Consultative Group on International
Agricultural Research and determines much of the agricultural research
priorities in the world.):
We, the farmers of Sri Lanka would like to further thank the CGIAR,
for taking an interest in us.
We believe that we speak for all of our brothers and sisters the
world over when we identify ourselves as a community who are integrally
tied to the success of ensuring global food security.
In fact it is our community who have contributed to the possibility
of food security in every country since mankind evolved from a
hunter-gather existence. We have watched for many years, as the
progression of experts, scientists and development agents passed through
our communities with some or another facet of the modern scientific
world.
We confess that at the start we were unsophisticated in matters of
the outside world and welcomed this input. We followed advice and we
planted as we were instructed.
The result was a loss of the varieties of seeds that we carried with
us through history, often spanning three or more millennia. The result
was the complete dependence of high input crops that robbed us of crop
independence.
In addition we farmers, producers of food, respected for our ability
to feed populations, were turned into the poisoners of land and living
things, including fellow human beings. The result in Sri Lanka is that
we suffer from social and cultural dislocation and suffer the highest
pesticide related death toll on the planet. Was this the legacy that you
the agricultural scientists wanted to bring to us? We think not. We
think that you had good motives and intentions, but left things in the
hands of narrowly educated, insensitive people.
Danger of pesticides
The statement was listened attentively by the top agricultural
scientists from all around the world.
Hopefully some were sensitized to these realities and are addressing
the stated problems.
But for us in Sri Lanka, what has transpired? From 1998 to 2006, have
the stated problems eased? Has the rate of pesticide poisoning gone
down? Did we have a national campaign to sensitize our rural population
on the dangers of pesticides? Have we reduced the volumes of toxins
being applied on the country? Have we instituted a monitoring system for
vegetables to protect the citizen's health? The answer to all these
questions is a resounding no! We need to ask why? Could it be that the
only sources of scholarships were to examine the worth of high input
agriculture? It is patently clear that agriculture must begin to look at
the long-term health of the consumer as well as the maintenance of
biodiversity as two clear goals of the production system.
Production system
In a fossil fuel energy deficient country like Sri Lanka, a national
composting program and a reduction of external inputs should be
instituted, but this cannot be done as a planned, phasing exercise. Just
giving a farmer a bag of compost without the requisite seed and
knowledge is a recipe for disaster. Change we must, but it needs to be
done in a judicious manner, incrementally, building our farmers to the
goals espoused by the Hon. D. S. Senanayake in his book Agriculture and
Patriotism.
Basis of national life
Agriculture is not merely a way of making money by raising crops; it
is not merely an industry or a business; it is essentially a public
function or service performed by private individuals for the care and
use of the land in the national interest; and farmers in the course of
securing a living and a private profit are the custodians of the basis
of the national life.
Agriculture is therefore affected with a clear and unquestionable
public interest and its status is a matter of national concern calling
for deliberate and far-sighted national policies, not only to conserve
the national and human resources involved in it, but to provide the
national security, promote a well round prosperity and secure social and
political stability.
The farmer statement to the CGIAR would seem to signify that we have
wandered far from these goals. Our farmers are amongst the most poorly
looked after, their traditions are being broken and their contribution
to society ignored.
Their economy is in ruins; Farmer suicides have become commonplace
one consequence that effects everyone is the poisoning of the nation. It
is time to become more aware that the old saying you are what you eat
and begin to look after our children and ourselves.
|