Afghan media pin hopes on new law
In her newsroom in Afghanistan's only independent news agency,
Pajhwok, Farida Nekzad sits worrying about information-gathering.
Greater curbs from government and greater threats to her reporters
have made her task more difficult.
Earlier this month she compered a function on world press freedom day
when Ajmal Naqshbandi's father limped onto the stage on crutches to
receive an honour on behalf of his journalist son who was killed by the
Taleban. The same function saw the mother of another journalist, Tawab
Niazi, accept an honour on behalf of her son, who is in jail for talking
to the Taleban.
"The death of Ajmal Naqshbandi and the media law have brought Afghan
journalists together," says Aqa Hussain Sancharaki, a journalist who
earlier held the post of deputy minister of information.
He now heads the Afghan National Journalists' Union.
Mr Sancharaki is taking a breather from campaigning for press freedom
after the lower house of parliament passed the hotly debated media bill
last week.
The bill will now go to the upper house of parliament and
subsequently for presidential assent before it becomes law.
In its initial form the bill caused a great deal of concern since it
brought the state-owned Radio Television Afghanistan under greater
government control and opened private media content to more intense
scrutiny and government control.
It also listed a number of broad-ranging restrictions on media
content that could be widely interpreted or open to misuse.
Cautious
Intense lobbying of MPs by journalists, open debates and seminars, an
informed critique of the provisions of the draft law, an awareness
campaign and some political manoeuvring have helped remove some of the
more restrictive clauses from the draft law.
Journalists are, however, cautious about celebrating, aware that the
bill might still undergo many mutations and that several of the current
provisions are still less than desirable.
"We have some concerns, though there are some good things in the new
bill," says Mr Sancharaki.
His opinion is also shared by the president of the Association of
Independent Afghan Journalists, Rahimullah Samander.
Mr Samander states their concerns bluntly when he says that
journalists were worried that the warlords who were amongst the more
conservative members would push through a law that would impact
negatively on the media. His fears were not unfounded.
Unfettered media
The Religious and Cultural Affairs Commission, headed by former
commander Haji Mohammed Mohaqeq, had argued along with the government
that an unfettered media would run amok, discrediting individuals
without any checks or balances.
Information and Culture Minister Abdul Karim Khurram argued that the
country could not afford to have a state broadcaster that was not under
government control in a situation of war.
In its current form the media bill has freed the state broadcaster
Radio Television Afghanistan from under the control of the Ministry of
Information and Culture.
Instead, the broadcaster has been brought under an independent
commission which comprises professionals and civil society
representatives, including journalists.
The move has been welcomed by journalists, but they are still unsure
about the extent of control the government will exert.
A council for formulating media policy now has representation from
journalists, although it is still heavily weighed in favour of the
government, and the commission for monitoring private media is now made
up of professionals.
There are, however, no clear provisions for resolving disputes or the
extent of powers of each of the commissions. The new draft bill also
retains some of the wide-ranging content restriction clauses.
The list of prohibitions includes:
content that goes against the principles of Islam
materials humiliating and offensive to real or legal entities
materials inconsistent with Afghanistan's constitution
anything that is considered a crime by the penal code
publicising and promotion of religions other than Islam
broadcasting pictures of victims of violence and rape in a way to
cause damage to their social dignity
topics that harm the physical, spiritual and moral well-being of
people, especially children and adolescents. Some of these prohibitions
remain open to wide interpretation.
Limit
Also worrying is the stipulation that makes it mandatory for the mass
media to include programmes on health, the environment, and education,
as well as on the dangers of cultivating, producing and consuming
illegal drugs.
While public education is indeed a necessary component of media, the
law does not stipulate a limit on the amount or nature of mandatory
material, again leaving this open to interpretation and possible misuse.
The manager of Radio Killid, Najiba Ayubi, is cautious.
"It is not a complete or perfect law, but I can say it is better than
before." Ms Ayubi has been involved with the debate and campaign for a
better law during which journalists also brought in Article 19 to
explain some of the issues to parliamentarians. This achievement of
Afghan journalists has come at a crucial time.
One of the most successful stories of post-conflict reconstruction,
Afghanistan's media are now facing one of their most challenging
periods.
Increasing curbs on information have been accompanied by greater
violence and increasing intolerance from all sides, even as a sharp cut
in donor funding has forced many media organisations to close down,
downsize or worry about their survival.
Afghan journalists hope that the new media law, once passed, will
give them more rights, rather than making their jobs more difficult.
BBC
|