The economic integration of SAARC
by Professor Mahfuz R. Chowdhury
Economic growth today is a collective matter in a very significant
way. Not even a nation, big or small, can think of going it alone
anymore. In fact, the whole world has become so inter-linked that every
event no matter how small or where it happens is having an instant
worldwide effect. Earlier, the world had to deal with rising
nationalism, and governments had to find ways to protect domestic
industries from outside competition. Now, the world is increasingly
dealing with globalization, and so governments have to promote the
efficient management of domestic industries in order to withstand
foreign competition.
The term 'globalization' may entail many things. From an economic
point of view, globalization refers to the effects of extensive free
trade among nations as well as the increase in the movement of capital
and labor. Trade among nations is not a new phenomenon. However, because
of the free trade policy being promoted by the United States and because
of the emergence of new technologies, such as the internet, fast
communication, and rapid transportation, market globalization has
accelerated tremendously since the 1990s. Currently, things move from
one place to another almost in a flash. Capital flows wherever there is
profit, and people follow the money in search of a better life.
Accordingly, to meet the challenge of globalization, the world is
frequently undergoing various economic realignments. One of the current
major trends among the countries seems to be to bury their hatchets and
create or join a free trade block, where goods and services can move
freely from one country to another with no tariffs or duties.
The primary idea is to establish a solid market structure for
domestic industries to be able to withstand global competition. A free
trade area helps a business firm grow, as it increases the size of the
market. As mass production often leads to efficiency and lower
production costs, business firms with a bigger market become more
competitive. Moreover, competition from firms in other members of the
free trade zone forces firms to try yet harder to be more efficient, and
at the same time drives the weaker firms out. In this way, by becoming
more efficient, the domestic firms could prepare themselves to avert the
adverse effects of globalization.
Europe would be a good example for the beneficial effects of economic
realignments. Europe is essentially an amalgamation of states with
different languages, cultures and nationalities. Many of the world's
important events including the democratic movement and capitalism
originated there. However, history is filled with tales of enmity and
competition among European states.
Without even going too far back in history, one could get an idea
about the extent of hostilities that existed in Europe from the
following examples: The Hundred Years' War between France and England
that lasted from 1337 to 1453; the many wars of Napoleon Bonaparte
during his rule over France from 1804 to 1815; World War I (1914 to
1918), though classified as a global conflict, took place primarily in
Europe; World War II (1939 to 1945) originated as a conflict among
European nations; and then there was the savage war in Yugoslavia in the
1990s. In addition, one should consider traditional communal enmities
between the English and the French, the French and the Germans, the
Germans and the Poles, the Poles and the Russians, the English and the
Irish, Serbs and Croats, Serbs and Kosovars, etc.
But it is hard to imagine those old enmities nowadays. Amazingly,
economic interests are rapidly changing the situation in Europe and
bringing the previously disgruntled countries together by eliminating
all international barriers to an improved economic life. The European
Union, which was officially launched in 1993 with only six member
states, has since expanded to twenty seven, comprising a majority of
states in Europe. In 2002, twelve member states also surrendered their
national currencies and adopted the Euro as their common currency.
Slovenia adopted the Euro this year, and more countries are likely to
follow suit next year. All these moves are indeed intended to face one
thing - the market globalization. The EU countries' GDP of over $13
trillion in 2006 rivals that of the United States, and will surely go up
when additional states join the union.
In order to maintain its superiority and to counter the move by the
Europeans, the United States quickly created its North American Free
Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with Canada and Mexico in 1994. Even in the
absence of a congenial overall relationship, the United States found
good reasons to form an economic alliance with Mexico. As a free trade
block, NAFTA countries' GDP exceeds $15 trillion, which is also poised
to go up if and when Chile and other Central American countries are
granted their memberships as expected. But unlike the European Union,
NAFTA is limited in scope. For example, the United States would allow
free movement of goods and services from Mexico, but disallows free
movement of its people. In other words, this is a special kind of
marriage limited to economic integration with no social assimilation,
and it is designed simply to help domestic industries withstand global
competition.
Capitalism, the present dominant economic system, clearly thrives on
specialization and trade. So market control is the name of the game in
capitalism. In this game of market dominance, what is good for the goose
should be good for the gander! Put it another way, if the above tactic
of market integration works well for the rich and industrialized
countries, why shouldn't it work for others? In fact, it should serve as
a wake up call for the emerging economies to create their own free trade
block as it may be the best and most practical defense for the
maintenance of stability and growth.
Let's look at the situation of the South Asian Association of
Regional Cooperation (SAARC), a regional organization that has a
potential to greatly benefit from an effective free trade block.
SAARC was initially launched in 1985 with four states, but has now
expanded to eight, comprising all of the states in the Indian
sub-continent and Afghanistan, which joined this year as the newest
member. The organization encompasses a region that houses almost one
fourth of the world's population.
This region as a whole is known for its many diversities as well as
major conflicts. Yet, under trying circumstances, it has emerged as one
of the fastest growing regions on earth; this is especially true in the
case of India.
To be continued next week
|