Ring in a better society
Mobile phones are in the news again. A mobile phone was behind the
tragic incident at a leading girls' school in Colombo. This is not the
first time that mobile phones have caused such misery, but the very high
profile nature of the case has awakened society to the dangers posed by
mobiles in wrong hands.
If the statistics quoted by the five mobile operators are true, there
should be around 10 million mobile telephones in active use. This is a
tremendous achievement for a Third World nation, for in reality it means
that almost everyone has a mobile phone, if you count out very young
children and very old persons. It also means that a good number of
schoolchildren have mobile phones, mostly gifted by parents or
relatives. And most of them are not basic models - they are filled to
the brim with features, including the obligatory megapixel still/video
camera, 3G, video playback, memory card slots, games et al.
Why do students need mobile phones? Generations of Lankans have gone
to school without ever seeing a telephone in their homes, leave alone
mobiles, a relatively new technology introduced to Sri Lanka in 1989,
when this writer was just finishing schooling. That has not made them
any less savvy in the wider society. If we ever wanted to take a call
during or after school hours, we went to the school office or an outside
post office. But that need hardly arose.
Today, children routinely carry mobiles into their classrooms and
even use them while taking down lessons. Texting friends has become the
norm while the classes are on, to the point that some students cannot
write even a couple of sentences in 'normal' English. Worse, with phones
equipped with cameras, web browsing and video capability becoming
common, that age old evil has crept into children's minds - pornography.
One no longer needs VCDs pr DVDs to access such material - the mobile
will do nicely.
Thus all right thinking citizens will laud the Government's decision
to ban the use of mobile phones by students. This decision should have
been taken earlier, but as they say, better late than never.
In fact, for a country that still does not allow the use of
calculators in school and public examinations, it is surprising that
banning the equally ubiquitous mobile in schools took this long. Many
international schools have done this for years - students who have
mobiles should leave them with security, where a token is given.
This being a democracy, there is no law which can possibly prevent
the use of mobiles by students outside school and school hours, but
parents can perhaps discourage their sons and daughters from carrying a
mobile on school days. But once inside the school, this new rule must be
strictly applied. We hope teachers will also lead by example, by not
using their mobiles in school.
That leaves the question of handling any emergency situation which
may require a student to phone home. We suggest the installation of a
couple of card/coin operated payphones in each school the use of which
can be supervised by a teacher or school worker. That is a fair solution
which will satisfy both students and school administrators.However,
there is no reason why school authorities should stop at mobile phones.
Children should not be allowed to bring in any device with video and/or
gaming capability - iPods, PSPs, MS Zunes, Creative Zens etc. The school
administrators are well within their rights to prohibit audio-only
devices as well including radios and MP3 players.
It is not only in schools that mobile phones have become a menace.
Granted, it is an essential communications tool in the modern world. One
can be contacted virtually anywhere, anytime if equipped with a mobile
phone. But some seem to have taken it a bit too far. For example, we see
plenty of drivers with their ears practically glued to the phone. This
is extremely dangerous for all road users, for the driver's full
attention is not on controlling the car or looking at the road ahead.
Then there are those who use the phone in restaurants or movie/drama
theatres. Years ago, I saw a promotional trailer in a Canadian cinema -
a bomb disposal expert is called into defuse a 'garden variety' nuclear
bomb.
Just as he gets ready to cut the wire, a mobile phone rings. He is
distracted and the bomb explodes. This was followed by a message to
'keep your mobile phones switched off' during the movie. Yes, it can be
quite annoying when a ringer goes off in the middle of an engrossing
movie/drama and it does ruin the experience. All phones offer a silent
mode precisely for this reason, but it should not be a big deal to keep
it entirely switched off for a couple of hours, unless your life depends
on it.
There are others who talk into their phones very loudly in public
transport. For the record, I do not want to know whether someone has
bathed the dog or taken the cat to the vet. Conversations can be
conducted without being a hindrance to others.
As I have mentioned previously, today's phones let you do a lot more
besides taking and answering voice calls. Privacy concerns have been
raised, with people using the in-built phone cameras to capture private
activities of others.
Such practices have naturally permeated into schools as well. Once
again, it is a tricky situation as phone cameras do have many legitimate
uses, just like their stand-alone counterparts. Technology evolves a
terrific pace and people will always find immoral ways to use such
technology. It is up to civil society to take steps towards eliminating
such practices.
We must also laud the Government for requesting Internet Service
Providers (ISPs) to block pornographic and other harmful websites. This
was also a long overdue measure. One might argue that such a measure
would infringe on fundamental freedoms, but such steps are vital for the
greater good of the greatest number. And the greatest number in this
country would necessarily mean the 4.5 million schoolchildren.
The Police also deserve plaudits for raiding video stores which
openly or secretly rent/sell pornographic VCDs and DVDs to children and
adults. Young school boys in uniform are frequently seen at such
so-called video parlours.
The Customs should be on alert for consignments of such videos and
destroy them if and when detected. Those running such rackets must be
apprehended.
There has been another suggestion to ban or restrict the airing on
free-to-air television of advertisements that either exploit women and
children or portray them in a bad light. It is a fact that children are
used to advertise various products in an unethical manner.
Women are used in various suggestive ways to promote everything from
shampoos to cars. The authorities should look into this matter, now that
concrete action has been taken on several similar fronts. There are many
advertisements on television, aired on prime time, that families cannot
sit together and watch.
There is an acute need for an independent and impartial Advertising
Complaints Commission in this country for probing complaints on
advertisements and regulating the industry as a whole. Such bodies exist
in several countries including England and they can become a foundation
for a similar institution here.
There should be no room for advertisers and television stations to
pollute young minds via advertisements and exploit women and children
for commercial gain. There should be laws to prevent such instances.
Creativity should not be a licence for vulgarity, in any audiovisual or
print medium.
That brings us to the whole question of teledramas aired on local
television channels. Most of them feature downright crude language and
expressions which are not suitable for young children. They also feature
themes and concepts which can affect young minds. But they are aired
from 7 p.m. to 9.30 p.m. to ensure a 'family' audience and a maximum
target level for the countless advertisers. Stopping these teledramas
would be commercial suicide for the networks, but it should be possible
to adjust the timings. In the long run, such dramas could even be phased
out and replaced with quality productions. We do not say that children
should grow up without knowing what romance is, but there is a way to
present everything in a family friendly way.
That is a challenge facing both regulators and the wider society. We
cannot stop the forward march of technology or their use by young
people. They will often be the first to use high technology as soon as
it reaches the average consumer. There is a greater role for parents in
this scenario - they can control what their children buy or access. In
any case, they have an obligation to ensure that their children do not
go astray. Teachers and principals are the next line of defence.
Religious leaders too should play a pro-active role in guiding the
children on the correct path.
It is only through such a concerted effort that we can build a
society that cherishes moral values over material things.
|