Sunday Observer Online
   

Home

Sunday, 5 June 2011

Untitled-1

observer
 ONLINE


OTHER PUBLICATIONS


OTHER LINKS

Marriage Proposals
Classified
Government Gazette

Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa at international symposium :

Political leadership - key factor in defeating terrorism



Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa addresses the symposium

Political leadership has always been the key factor in defeating terrorism; President Mahinda Rajapaksa had the clear aim and commitment to rescue the country from terrorism once and for all. Over the years, there had been many attempts at militarily defeating the LTTE, but none of these campaigns had met with lasting success. The most distinctive feature of the humanitarian operations launched in 2006 was the clear aim and commitment of the President to rescue the country from terrorism once and for all, stated Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa, delivering the keynote address at the International Defence Symposium, ‘Defeating Terrorism - The Sri Lanka Experience’ held in Colombo last week.

Four previous presidents as well as several successive governments comprising various political parties had grappled with the issue without success, he said.

“Over the years, a range of different approaches including military campaigns, peace talks, and even international mediation had been tried. None had worked”, he said.

“At a time so many countries the world over are facing the problems posed by domestic and international terrorism, we believe that sharing the lessons learnt from the Sri Lankan experience in combating terrorist tactics, providing humanitarian assistance and dealing with political and international factors is important. It is our earnest hope that these lessons will help our friends and allies in the international community to defeat international terrorism”, he said.

The following is the full text of the keynote address delivered by Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa RWP RSP PSC MSC.

“It is a pleasure and a privilege for me to address you at the opening ceremony of the seminar organised by the Sri Lanka Army: ‘Defeating Terrorism - The Sri Lankan Experience’.

This seminar takes place at an opportune moment, just two years after this country’s victory over the brutal terrorism of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, better known as the LTTE. On behalf of the Government of Sri Lanka, I am particularly proud to welcome our distinguished foreign delegates and other invited guests. Sri Lanka’s experience in overcoming terrorism is the theme of this seminar. Over the next few days, you will meet many of the field commanders involved in the operations, who will be able to discuss the tactics used to achieve victory.

At a time when so many countries the world over are facing the problems posed by domestic and international terrorism, we believe that sharing the lessons learnt from the Sri Lankan experience in combating terrorist tactics, providing humanitarian assistance and dealing with political and international factors is important. It is our earnest hope that these lessons will help our friends and allies in the international community defeat international terrorism. Sri Lanka’s experience with terrorism began in the 1970s.


Some of the participants

When President Mahinda Rajapaksa assumed office in December 2005, terrorist activities in Sri Lanka had dragged on for nearly 30 years. Four previous presidents as well as several successive governments comprising various political parties had grappled with the issue without success. Over the years, a range of different approaches including military campaigns, peace talks, and even international mediation had been tried. None had worked. With a large global financial network, highly developed offensive capabilities and no genuine interest in peace, the LTTE was a stubborn, hostile and formidable foe.

Over the years, the LTTE had grown from a small organisation of armed individuals to a large, sophisticated terrorist outfit with very advanced combat capabilities. At its height, the LTTE had more than 30,000 battle-hardened cadre; access to large stockpiles of modern armaments, ammunition and equipment; a sophisticated naval wing and a fledgling air wing. By 2005, the LTTE controlled almost a quarter of the country’s territory and approximately two thirds of its coastline. Under an internationally brokered Ceasefire Agreement, the LTTE even maintained the illusion of a state apparatus in the areas under its control. It must be understood that notwithstanding this, the LTTE was one of the deadliest terrorist organisations in the world. The list of the LTTE’s atrocities is long. Over the years, the LTTE carried out ethnic cleansing in the North and the East, brutally driving out the Sinhalese and Muslim civilians who lived there.

They carried out countless attacks on civilians. They attacked villages near the areas they occupied, massacring thousands. They attacked places of worship such as the Sri Maha Bodhi and the Temple of the Tooth, the two most significant places of worship for Buddhists all over the world. They also carried out massacres at mosques and attacked churches. The LTTE attacked vital national infrastructure such as the international airport, the central bus stand and the main railway station in Colombo.

Economic targets

They attacked economic targets such as the Central Bank, the World Trade Centre, oil refineries and civilian harbours. They set off countless parcel bombs, car bombs, truck bombs and claymore mines in populated areas, killing thousands of innocent civilians, and they perfected the tactic of suicide bombing.

The LTTE also carried out a vicious campaign of assassinations against political targets, killing the President of Sri Lanka, the former Prime Minister of India, the Defence Minister, the Foreign Minister, several Cabinet ministers, leaders of political parties, and a large number of parliamentarians. These are all the hallmarks of a brutal, ruthless and unrestrained terrorist organisation.

The impact of the LTTE’s atrocities throughout Sri Lanka resulted in untold suffering for our entire population. In the areas outside the LTTE’s control, ordinary people’s day-to-day lives were transformed by terrorism. Parents did not travel together in the same vehicle for fear of orphaning their children by getting caught in a bomb blast. Students’ school attendance dropped every time rumours spread about impending terrorist attacks. Law and order deteriorated as terrorism fostered crime and corruption. The underworld became more powerful and its members gained access to arms and ammunition from the various armed groups operating in the country at large.

In brief, an entire generation grew up under a veil of fear. There was a complete disruption to civilian life in the entire nation. In the areas under the LTTE’s dominance, life was very much worse.

The LTTE were no freedom fighters on behalf of a beleaguered populace. On the contrary, they were a vicious group of terrorists that kept the people in the regions they dominated under a brutal dictatorship. The LTTE did not tolerate any opposition.

The LTTE assassinated the leaders of other armed groups in these areas, and wiped out any group members who refused to support its cause. The LTTE also assassinated moderate democratic leaders and influential public intellectuals in the Tamil community, and kept the people under their dominance trapped in a state of fear. For its part, the Sri Lankan Government did everything it could, to maintain the supply of necessary services such as electricity, water, healthcare and education to the people in these areas.

Unfortunately, the LTTE did not allow these services to be properly used. As a result, while the rest of the country developed, the areas under the LTTE stagnated. This stagnation was not only economic, but also socio-political. Although the LTTE claimed to maintain a police force, judicial system and the other trappings of a state apparatus during the time the Ceasefire Agreement was in force, these were feeble attempts to disguise a territory held under gunpoint. No one in those areas was safe; no one was free.

Rescuing the hundreds of thousands of innocent Sri Lankans suffering under the fist of the LTTE’s brutal fascism was a key priority of President Rajapaksa when he was elected by the people to office in 2005. He was given a very clear mandate by the people to solve the terrorist problem once and for all and win an honourable peace for Sri Lanka.

As such, he invited the LTTE for direct talks and attempted to restart the stalled negotiations. Typically, the LTTE responded by intensifying their campaign of provocation. They blatantly violated the Ceasefire Agreement then in place. They attacked key military targets, including our highest ranked personnel, and continued attacking innocent civilians.

The claymore mines set off at Kabethigollewa, and other attacks at various locations all around the country killed hundreds of innocent children, women and men.

The Government bore these provocations with patience, but the final straw was when the LTTE shut down the sluice gates at Maavilaru, a key irrigation channel for agriculture in the East. This inhumane act cut off water to thousands of acres of agricultural land, as well as over 5,200 households and threatened a humanitarian disaster.

Military campaign

The Government could not allow this situation to worsen, and the Government was forced to resort to a military campaign to open the Maavilaru sluice gates.

Over the years, there had been many attempts at militarily defeating the LTTE, but none of these campaigns had met with lasting success. The most distinctive feature of the humanitarian operations launched in 2006 was the clear aim and commitment of the President to rescue the country from terrorism once and for all. Having a clear, unambiguous aim is absolutely vital, as no successful operation can be launched if any doubt lingers in the minds of the personnel entrusted to achieve it.

In the past, the military had pushed forward with great success on many occasions only to be prevented from consolidating these successes to a permanent victory due to external factors.

In contrast, when our humanitarian operation began in 2006, the military understood that the President’s commitment to eradicating terrorism was unshakeable. His statements and actions during the humanitarian operations proved this beyond doubt, not only to the military, but to the entire population. As importantly, there was no change in his resoluteness from the first day of the operations to the last. The committed leadership displayed by the President was also absolutely vital.

For the duration of the humanitarian operations, over three and a half years, the President chaired the weekly Security Council meetings, where the debrief for the past week and the plans for the coming week were discussed. By constantly keeping in touch with the unfolding situation, the President, as Commander-in-Chief, was fully cognisant of the great progress being made. When there were setbacks, as there can be in any military operation, he understood that they were only temporary.

During the course of the operations, in the face of increasing military casualties and mounting international criticism, no matter how unfounded, the President stood firm and absorbed all these pressures.

As Commander-in-Chief, his resolute stance gave our personnel the confidence to press ahead with their operations. He never faltered from the ultimate goal. The President also reacted very promptly in crisis situations. When the LTTE’s claymore mine attack on a bus killed close to 70 innocent civilians at Kebethigollawa, a village in the North Central Province very close to LTTE dominated territory, he went to the scene immediately.

Though the situation was tense, he visited the mortuary, spoke to the bereaved as well as the other people in the affected area.

He immediately instructed the local commander to strengthen defence around such threatened villages to prevent further LTTE atrocities. Similarly, when the LTTE developed its light low-flying aircraft that threatened vital installations as well as civilians in Colombo during night raids, the President personally supervised the rehearsals of the new air defence system that was installed at the Katunayake Air Base to counter this threat. Such examples of commitment and leadership at the very top gave a lot of confidence to the entire country during this difficult period.

The President’s personal commitment to the success of the humanitarian operation went above and beyond the call of duty. In the East, when the LTTE-dominated town of Vakarai was liberated, he went to the town to congratulate our troops even though the East had not been completely cleared. He also visited the key town of Kilinochchi, which had been the LTTE’s stronghold in the North, as soon as it was liberated. This was a landmark victory during the course of the war, and although the Northern operation was still in progress, the President went there to speak to the troops. Such acts gave our military personnel every encouragement as well as the confidence to press ahead and see the humanitarian operation through to its conclusion.

Humanitarian operations

There were many key factors that led to the success of the humanitarian operations. Perhaps, the most important and critical factor was the President’s decision to expand the Armed Forces. One of the first things we realised when we studied the previous military campaigns was that the Sri Lankan military was always superior to the LTTE. Our talented commanders and dedicated personnel most often succeeded in their encounters with the enemy. Specialised regiments such as the Special Forces and the Commandos had developed a very high level of skill and professionalism over the years, and were more than capable of defeating the LTTE in single battles.

However, there just were not enough troops in the Armed Forces to consolidate these wins in battle to achieve final victory in the war. The primary reason for this was the sheer extent of land that the LTTE was active in and the guerrilla tactics it used to dominate them.

These included the Eastern Province, of which one third was controlled by the LTTE; the Jaffna peninsula, islands and the Muhamalai Forward Defence Lines which were under Government control, but in which the LTTE was also active; and the Vanni, which was a vast jungle terrain fully dominated and controlled by the LTTE.

Due to the LTTE’s terrorist activities, the rest of the country also needed attention. In the Jaffna peninsula, islands and the Forward Defence Lines at Muhamalai, there were 40,000 troops already deployed. It was necessary to hold these positions in strength. Once the Eastern Province was cleared, it was equally essential to hold the territory in strength to prevent the LTTE from infiltrating it again.

It should be noted that at the time, the LTTE leader proclaimed that the defeat in the East was only a temporary tactical withdrawal. This is because Government Forces had cleared the Eastern Province in the past, only for the LTTE to return in numbers and re-occupy and restart terrorism there while the military was actively engaged elsewhere. A repetition of this was avoided because we had enough personnel on the ground to hold and dominate the territory. When it came to the Vanni, it was necessary for the military to operate on a number of different axes and on a wider frontage.

During past operations, one of the major LTTE tactics was to penetrate the front line of the military, infiltrate our territory and attack from the rear. It was necessary to strongly hold the rear and have several counter-penetration lines to guard against this tactic. It was also absolutely essential that we have enough troops to guard against the threat posed by LTTE suicide cadre and operatives who had infiltrated the rest of the country.

It was absolutely essential to secure key infrastructure in and around Colombo, such as the international airport, the harbour and the oil refinery. It was equally important to prevent LTTE’s attacks on civilians, and several operations were carried out to identify and neutralise terrorist cells. President Rajapaksa had the will and courage to take the difficult decision to expand the military to the size required to win an extended campaign in the North and the East while also protecting the rest of the country.

The combined strength of the Armed Forces in 2005 was nowhere near the number that was actually required for a serious campaign to eradicate the LTTE. This fact was clearly understood by the President, and the decision was made to expand the strength of the military. By projecting its intentions very clearly to the public, the Government encouraged a lot of young people to step forward and join the Armed Forces. They did so because they understood that the political leadership had both the clear aim of eradicating terrorism, and the will to achieve it. Between the end of 2005 and the end of 2009, the Army’s nine divisions were increased to 20; its 44 brigades expanded to 71 and its 149 battalions increased to 284.

This was a large, but essential expansion that increased the number of Army personnel from 120,000 in 2005 to over 200,000 by the end of the humanitarian operation. The Navy and the Air Force were also expanded significantly, and they were also given tasks beyond their classic role. Many of their personnel were entrusted with holding ground even in jungles, and also given the responsibility of securing main supply routes. These measures were essential to safeguard peace in the rest of the country and ensure that operations could be adequately supported to proceed uninterrupted.

Suicide-bombing tacti

In past years, whenever a military operation was being carried out successfully, the LTTE would seek to distract the military by attacking innocent civilians in non-combat areas. Particularly through their perfecting of the suicide-bombing tactic, the LTTE were able to create chaos in the rest of the country while military operations were going on in the North and East. When this happened, pressure traditionally built on the Government to pause the military campaign and seek alternate solutions. By expanding the Army, Navy and Air Force, and using paramilitary forces like the Special Task Force of the Police, and by increasing the responsibilities of the Police itself, we addressed this situation without halting our progress. By safeguarding the rest of the country, the humanitarian operation could go ahead uninterrupted.

Another critical factor in this regard was formalising the Civil Defence Force. This was initially a loose organisation of civilians who had been given only shotguns to protect the villages under threat from the LTTE. When the decision to once again engage the LTTE militarily was made, it was clear that the LTTE would try to distract the operations by attacking more innocent civilians in villages. Therefore, it was necessary to formally organise these civilians into a proper paramilitary force capable of protecting vulnerable villages. Over 42,000 able bodied men were recruited from the villages and given proper training as well as equipment.

They played a significant role in protecting their villages from LTTE attacks during the course of the humanitarian operations. Alongside the commitment of the President and the political hierarchy to the humanitarian operations, it was equally essential that the Government itself has the stability to see the campaign through to its conclusion.

This was a particular issue for the President and the key political leadership because the then Government comprised a coalition that had only a tenuous majority in Parliament.

If the Government had collapsed at any point during the military campaign, all our efforts would have been in vain. The President managed this issue by keeping his party’s coalition partners together and persuading Opposition figures to support him and consolidate the party’s position in Parliament.

For this reason, the Cabinet had to be increased to a historic size, and various portfolios were handed over to notable party members within the coalition. There was a great deal of criticism for this at the time, but it was an absolutely necessary step in maintaining the Government’s stability and political stability.

Even more important than maintaining political stability was generating popular support. By 2005, the Sri Lankan population had gone from war to peace and back. There was a lot of cynicism and war-weariness in the public at large. If the Government had focused only on the war, it was entirely possible that the people would not have supported the war effort.

This is one of the reasons why the Government invested so much on welfare efforts, even at a time when it could hardly afford to because of the large war budget. A sterling example of the thought given to the well-being of ordinary Sri Lankans was the fertiliser subsidy granted at a time when international prices were skyrocketing. This eased the heavy burden felt by Sri Lankan farmers, and kept food prices affordable to the general population. It should also not be forgotten that Sri Lanka had been ravaged by the Asian tsunami only two years before the military campaign was resumed.

There was a lot of rebuilding that had not yet been completed. In addition, a lot of infrastructure development, particularly in power generation and the upgrading of the road networks, was necessary to spur economic growth. The President and the Government did not ignore these responsibilities. Instead, they skilfully engaged in multi-focal governance, where the other critical national requirements were met while the focus on the military campaign was not in any way reduced.

Along with these domestic issues, another key factor underpinning the success of our operations was the management of international pressure by the political leadership. In 1987, the enormously successful Vadamarachchi operations had pushed the LTTE to the brink of defeat. However, these operations could not be sustained because the Indian Government intervened.

The primary problem in 1987 was that the relationship between the two countries had not been managed very effectively. In contrast, from the time of his election, President Rajapaksa went out of his way to keep New Delhi briefed about all the new developments taking place in Sri Lanka.

He understood that while other countries could mount pressure on us through diplomatic channels or economic means, only India could influence the military campaign. From very early in the humanitarian operations, the relationship between Sri Lanka and India was managed through maintaining a clear communications line at the very highest level.

A special committee was established to engage in constant dialogue. The Sri Lankan side comprised then Senior Advisor to the President Basil Rajapaksa, Secretary to the President Lalith Weeratunga, and myself, as Defence Secretary. The Indian side comprised former National Security Advisor M.K. Narayan, then Foreign Secretary Shiv Shankar Menon and then Defence Secretary Vijay Singh.

This troika had continuous discussions and ensured that whenever any sensitive issues arose, they would be resolved immediately. The Government also ensured that our relationships with other important regional allies and other friendly countries were well maintained through usual diplomatic channels and regular dialogue. Ultimately this able management of critical international relations was another key success factor in the eradication of terrorism. Unfortunately, it has to be noted that influential figures in a few countries outside the region were sceptical about the Government’s decision to re-open a military campaign against the LTTE. There were many reasons for this.

Key reason

A key reason was a fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of the LTTE and the necessity to eradicate it. I spoke earlier about the numerous atrocities and human rights violations carried out by the LTTE. Unfortunately, the LTTE also had a great deal of global influence through some elements of the Tamil diaspora, which played a significant role in the electoral politics of certain Western nations.This influence, combined with the skill of the LTTE propaganda machine, was strong enough to create a false, competing narrative in which the LTTE assumed the guise of a liberation army for an oppressed population.

This is far from the truth. While it is true that the LTTE’s first major attack on an Army convoy in 1983 sparked riots in the South during which the Tamil community suffered at the hands of violent mobs, Sri Lanka as a nation grew up very rapidly after that incident and left those dark days far behind. ?

Continued next week

 

EMAIL |   PRINTABLE VIEW | FEEDBACK

Kapruka
www.news.lk
www.defence.lk
Donate Now | defence.lk
www.apiwenuwenapi.co.uk
LANKAPUVATH - National News Agency of Sri Lanka
Telecommunications Regulatory Commission of Sri Lanka (TRCSL)
www.army.lk
 

| News | Editorial | Finance | Features | Political | Security | Sports | Spectrum | Montage | Impact | World | Obituaries | Junior | Magazine |

 
 

Produced by Lake House Copyright © 2011 The Associated Newspapers of Ceylon Ltd.

Comments and suggestions to : Web Editor