Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa at international
symposium :
Political leadership - key factor in defeating terrorism

Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa addresses the symposium
|
Political leadership has always been the key factor in defeating
terrorism; President Mahinda Rajapaksa had the clear aim and commitment
to rescue the country from terrorism once and for all. Over the years,
there had been many attempts at militarily defeating the LTTE, but none
of these campaigns had met with lasting success. The most distinctive
feature of the humanitarian operations launched in 2006 was the clear
aim and commitment of the President to rescue the country from terrorism
once and for all, stated Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa,
delivering the keynote address at the International Defence Symposium,
‘Defeating Terrorism - The Sri Lanka Experience’ held in Colombo last
week.
Four previous presidents as well as several successive governments
comprising various political parties had grappled with the issue without
success, he said.
“Over the years, a range of different approaches including military
campaigns, peace talks, and even international mediation had been tried.
None had worked”, he said.
“At a time so many countries the world over are facing the problems
posed by domestic and international terrorism, we believe that sharing
the lessons learnt from the Sri Lankan experience in combating terrorist
tactics, providing humanitarian assistance and dealing with political
and international factors is important. It is our earnest hope that
these lessons will help our friends and allies in the international
community to defeat international terrorism”, he said.
The following is the full text of the keynote address delivered by
Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa RWP RSP PSC MSC.
“It is a pleasure and a privilege for me to address you at the
opening ceremony of the seminar organised by the Sri Lanka Army:
‘Defeating Terrorism - The Sri Lankan Experience’.
This seminar takes place at an opportune moment, just two years after
this country’s victory over the brutal terrorism of the Liberation
Tigers of Tamil Eelam, better known as the LTTE. On behalf of the
Government of Sri Lanka, I am particularly proud to welcome our
distinguished foreign delegates and other invited guests. Sri Lanka’s
experience in overcoming terrorism is the theme of this seminar. Over
the next few days, you will meet many of the field commanders involved
in the operations, who will be able to discuss the tactics used to
achieve victory.
At a time when so many countries the world over are facing the
problems posed by domestic and international terrorism, we believe that
sharing the lessons learnt from the Sri Lankan experience in combating
terrorist tactics, providing humanitarian assistance and dealing with
political and international factors is important. It is our earnest hope
that these lessons will help our friends and allies in the international
community defeat international terrorism. Sri Lanka’s experience with
terrorism began in the 1970s.

Some of the participants |
When President Mahinda Rajapaksa assumed office in December 2005,
terrorist activities in Sri Lanka had dragged on for nearly 30 years.
Four previous presidents as well as several successive governments
comprising various political parties had grappled with the issue without
success. Over the years, a range of different approaches including
military campaigns, peace talks, and even international mediation had
been tried. None had worked. With a large global financial network,
highly developed offensive capabilities and no genuine interest in
peace, the LTTE was a stubborn, hostile and formidable foe.
Over the years, the LTTE had grown from a small organisation of armed
individuals to a large, sophisticated terrorist outfit with very
advanced combat capabilities. At its height, the LTTE had more than
30,000 battle-hardened cadre; access to large stockpiles of modern
armaments, ammunition and equipment; a sophisticated naval wing and a
fledgling air wing. By 2005, the LTTE controlled almost a quarter of the
country’s territory and approximately two thirds of its coastline. Under
an internationally brokered Ceasefire Agreement, the LTTE even
maintained the illusion of a state apparatus in the areas under its
control. It must be understood that notwithstanding this, the LTTE was
one of the deadliest terrorist organisations in the world. The list of
the LTTE’s atrocities is long. Over the years, the LTTE carried out
ethnic cleansing in the North and the East, brutally driving out the
Sinhalese and Muslim civilians who lived there.
They carried out countless attacks on civilians. They attacked
villages near the areas they occupied, massacring thousands. They
attacked places of worship such as the Sri Maha Bodhi and the Temple of
the Tooth, the two most significant places of worship for Buddhists all
over the world. They also carried out massacres at mosques and attacked
churches. The LTTE attacked vital national infrastructure such as the
international airport, the central bus stand and the main railway
station in Colombo.
Economic targets
They attacked economic targets such as the Central Bank, the World
Trade Centre, oil refineries and civilian harbours. They set off
countless parcel bombs, car bombs, truck bombs and claymore mines in
populated areas, killing thousands of innocent civilians, and they
perfected the tactic of suicide bombing.
The LTTE also carried out a vicious campaign of assassinations
against political targets, killing the President of Sri Lanka, the
former Prime Minister of India, the Defence Minister, the Foreign
Minister, several Cabinet ministers, leaders of political parties, and a
large number of parliamentarians. These are all the hallmarks of a
brutal, ruthless and unrestrained terrorist organisation.
The impact of the LTTE’s atrocities throughout Sri Lanka resulted in
untold suffering for our entire population. In the areas outside the
LTTE’s control, ordinary people’s day-to-day lives were transformed by
terrorism. Parents did not travel together in the same vehicle for fear
of orphaning their children by getting caught in a bomb blast. Students’
school attendance dropped every time rumours spread about impending
terrorist attacks. Law and order deteriorated as terrorism fostered
crime and corruption. The underworld became more powerful and its
members gained access to arms and ammunition from the various armed
groups operating in the country at large.
In brief, an entire generation grew up under a veil of fear. There
was a complete disruption to civilian life in the entire nation. In the
areas under the LTTE’s dominance, life was very much worse.
The LTTE were no freedom fighters on behalf of a beleaguered
populace. On the contrary, they were a vicious group of terrorists that
kept the people in the regions they dominated under a brutal
dictatorship. The LTTE did not tolerate any opposition.
The LTTE assassinated the leaders of other armed groups in these
areas, and wiped out any group members who refused to support its cause.
The LTTE also assassinated moderate democratic leaders and influential
public intellectuals in the Tamil community, and kept the people under
their dominance trapped in a state of fear. For its part, the Sri Lankan
Government did everything it could, to maintain the supply of necessary
services such as electricity, water, healthcare and education to the
people in these areas.
Unfortunately, the LTTE did not allow these services to be properly
used. As a result, while the rest of the country developed, the areas
under the LTTE stagnated. This stagnation was not only economic, but
also socio-political. Although the LTTE claimed to maintain a police
force, judicial system and the other trappings of a state apparatus
during the time the Ceasefire Agreement was in force, these were feeble
attempts to disguise a territory held under gunpoint. No one in those
areas was safe; no one was free.
Rescuing the hundreds of thousands of innocent Sri Lankans suffering
under the fist of the LTTE’s brutal fascism was a key priority of
President Rajapaksa when he was elected by the people to office in 2005.
He was given a very clear mandate by the people to solve the terrorist
problem once and for all and win an honourable peace for Sri Lanka.
As such, he invited the LTTE for direct talks and attempted to
restart the stalled negotiations. Typically, the LTTE responded by
intensifying their campaign of provocation. They blatantly violated the
Ceasefire Agreement then in place. They attacked key military targets,
including our highest ranked personnel, and continued attacking innocent
civilians.
The claymore mines set off at Kabethigollewa, and other attacks at
various locations all around the country killed hundreds of innocent
children, women and men.
The Government bore these provocations with patience, but the final
straw was when the LTTE shut down the sluice gates at Maavilaru, a key
irrigation channel for agriculture in the East. This inhumane act cut
off water to thousands of acres of agricultural land, as well as over
5,200 households and threatened a humanitarian disaster.
Military campaign
The Government could not allow this situation to worsen, and the
Government was forced to resort to a military campaign to open the
Maavilaru sluice gates.
Over the years, there had been many attempts at militarily defeating
the LTTE, but none of these campaigns had met with lasting success. The
most distinctive feature of the humanitarian operations launched in 2006
was the clear aim and commitment of the President to rescue the country
from terrorism once and for all. Having a clear, unambiguous aim is
absolutely vital, as no successful operation can be launched if any
doubt lingers in the minds of the personnel entrusted to achieve it.
In the past, the military had pushed forward with great success on
many occasions only to be prevented from consolidating these successes
to a permanent victory due to external factors.
In contrast, when our humanitarian operation began in 2006, the
military understood that the President’s commitment to eradicating
terrorism was unshakeable. His statements and actions during the
humanitarian operations proved this beyond doubt, not only to the
military, but to the entire population. As importantly, there was no
change in his resoluteness from the first day of the operations to the
last. The committed leadership displayed by the President was also
absolutely vital.
For the duration of the humanitarian operations, over three and a
half years, the President chaired the weekly Security Council meetings,
where the debrief for the past week and the plans for the coming week
were discussed. By constantly keeping in touch with the unfolding
situation, the President, as Commander-in-Chief, was fully cognisant of
the great progress being made. When there were setbacks, as there can be
in any military operation, he understood that they were only temporary.
During the course of the operations, in the face of increasing
military casualties and mounting international criticism, no matter how
unfounded, the President stood firm and absorbed all these pressures.
As Commander-in-Chief, his resolute stance gave our personnel the
confidence to press ahead with their operations. He never faltered from
the ultimate goal. The President also reacted very promptly in crisis
situations. When the LTTE’s claymore mine attack on a bus killed close
to 70 innocent civilians at Kebethigollawa, a village in the North
Central Province very close to LTTE dominated territory, he went to the
scene immediately.
Though the situation was tense, he visited the mortuary, spoke to the
bereaved as well as the other people in the affected area.
He immediately instructed the local commander to strengthen defence
around such threatened villages to prevent further LTTE atrocities.
Similarly, when the LTTE developed its light low-flying aircraft that
threatened vital installations as well as civilians in Colombo during
night raids, the President personally supervised the rehearsals of the
new air defence system that was installed at the Katunayake Air Base to
counter this threat. Such examples of commitment and leadership at the
very top gave a lot of confidence to the entire country during this
difficult period.
The President’s personal commitment to the success of the
humanitarian operation went above and beyond the call of duty. In the
East, when the LTTE-dominated town of Vakarai was liberated, he went to
the town to congratulate our troops even though the East had not been
completely cleared. He also visited the key town of Kilinochchi, which
had been the LTTE’s stronghold in the North, as soon as it was
liberated. This was a landmark victory during the course of the war, and
although the Northern operation was still in progress, the President
went there to speak to the troops. Such acts gave our military personnel
every encouragement as well as the confidence to press ahead and see the
humanitarian operation through to its conclusion.
Humanitarian operations
There were many key factors that led to the success of the
humanitarian operations. Perhaps, the most important and critical factor
was the President’s decision to expand the Armed Forces. One of the
first things we realised when we studied the previous military campaigns
was that the Sri Lankan military was always superior to the LTTE. Our
talented commanders and dedicated personnel most often succeeded in
their encounters with the enemy. Specialised regiments such as the
Special Forces and the Commandos had developed a very high level of
skill and professionalism over the years, and were more than capable of
defeating the LTTE in single battles.
However, there just were not enough troops in the Armed Forces to
consolidate these wins in battle to achieve final victory in the war.
The primary reason for this was the sheer extent of land that the LTTE
was active in and the guerrilla tactics it used to dominate them.
These included the Eastern Province, of which one third was
controlled by the LTTE; the Jaffna peninsula, islands and the Muhamalai
Forward Defence Lines which were under Government control, but in which
the LTTE was also active; and the Vanni, which was a vast jungle terrain
fully dominated and controlled by the LTTE.
Due to the LTTE’s terrorist activities, the rest of the country also
needed attention. In the Jaffna peninsula, islands and the Forward
Defence Lines at Muhamalai, there were 40,000 troops already deployed.
It was necessary to hold these positions in strength. Once the Eastern
Province was cleared, it was equally essential to hold the territory in
strength to prevent the LTTE from infiltrating it again.
It should be noted that at the time, the LTTE leader proclaimed that
the defeat in the East was only a temporary tactical withdrawal. This is
because Government Forces had cleared the Eastern Province in the past,
only for the LTTE to return in numbers and re-occupy and restart
terrorism there while the military was actively engaged elsewhere. A
repetition of this was avoided because we had enough personnel on the
ground to hold and dominate the territory. When it came to the Vanni, it
was necessary for the military to operate on a number of different axes
and on a wider frontage.
During past operations, one of the major LTTE tactics was to
penetrate the front line of the military, infiltrate our territory and
attack from the rear. It was necessary to strongly hold the rear and
have several counter-penetration lines to guard against this tactic. It
was also absolutely essential that we have enough troops to guard
against the threat posed by LTTE suicide cadre and operatives who had
infiltrated the rest of the country.
It was absolutely essential to secure key infrastructure in and
around Colombo, such as the international airport, the harbour and the
oil refinery. It was equally important to prevent LTTE’s attacks on
civilians, and several operations were carried out to identify and
neutralise terrorist cells. President Rajapaksa had the will and courage
to take the difficult decision to expand the military to the size
required to win an extended campaign in the North and the East while
also protecting the rest of the country.
The combined strength of the Armed Forces in 2005 was nowhere near
the number that was actually required for a serious campaign to
eradicate the LTTE. This fact was clearly understood by the President,
and the decision was made to expand the strength of the military. By
projecting its intentions very clearly to the public, the Government
encouraged a lot of young people to step forward and join the Armed
Forces. They did so because they understood that the political
leadership had both the clear aim of eradicating terrorism, and the will
to achieve it. Between the end of 2005 and the end of 2009, the Army’s
nine divisions were increased to 20; its 44 brigades expanded to 71 and
its 149 battalions increased to 284.
This was a large, but essential expansion that increased the number
of Army personnel from 120,000 in 2005 to over 200,000 by the end of the
humanitarian operation. The Navy and the Air Force were also expanded
significantly, and they were also given tasks beyond their classic role.
Many of their personnel were entrusted with holding ground even in
jungles, and also given the responsibility of securing main supply
routes. These measures were essential to safeguard peace in the rest of
the country and ensure that operations could be adequately supported to
proceed uninterrupted.
Suicide-bombing tacti
In past years, whenever a military operation was being carried out
successfully, the LTTE would seek to distract the military by attacking
innocent civilians in non-combat areas. Particularly through their
perfecting of the suicide-bombing tactic, the LTTE were able to create
chaos in the rest of the country while military operations were going on
in the North and East. When this happened, pressure traditionally built
on the Government to pause the military campaign and seek alternate
solutions. By expanding the Army, Navy and Air Force, and using
paramilitary forces like the Special Task Force of the Police, and by
increasing the responsibilities of the Police itself, we addressed this
situation without halting our progress. By safeguarding the rest of the
country, the humanitarian operation could go ahead uninterrupted.
Another critical factor in this regard was formalising the Civil
Defence Force. This was initially a loose organisation of civilians who
had been given only shotguns to protect the villages under threat from
the LTTE. When the decision to once again engage the LTTE militarily was
made, it was clear that the LTTE would try to distract the operations by
attacking more innocent civilians in villages. Therefore, it was
necessary to formally organise these civilians into a proper
paramilitary force capable of protecting vulnerable villages. Over
42,000 able bodied men were recruited from the villages and given proper
training as well as equipment.
They played a significant role in protecting their villages from LTTE
attacks during the course of the humanitarian operations. Alongside the
commitment of the President and the political hierarchy to the
humanitarian operations, it was equally essential that the Government
itself has the stability to see the campaign through to its conclusion.
This was a particular issue for the President and the key political
leadership because the then Government comprised a coalition that had
only a tenuous majority in Parliament.
If the Government had collapsed at any point during the military
campaign, all our efforts would have been in vain. The President managed
this issue by keeping his party’s coalition partners together and
persuading Opposition figures to support him and consolidate the party’s
position in Parliament.
For this reason, the Cabinet had to be increased to a historic size,
and various portfolios were handed over to notable party members within
the coalition. There was a great deal of criticism for this at the time,
but it was an absolutely necessary step in maintaining the Government’s
stability and political stability.
Even more important than maintaining political stability was
generating popular support. By 2005, the Sri Lankan population had gone
from war to peace and back. There was a lot of cynicism and
war-weariness in the public at large. If the Government had focused only
on the war, it was entirely possible that the people would not have
supported the war effort.
This is one of the reasons why the Government invested so much on
welfare efforts, even at a time when it could hardly afford to because
of the large war budget. A sterling example of the thought given to the
well-being of ordinary Sri Lankans was the fertiliser subsidy granted at
a time when international prices were skyrocketing. This eased the heavy
burden felt by Sri Lankan farmers, and kept food prices affordable to
the general population. It should also not be forgotten that Sri Lanka
had been ravaged by the Asian tsunami only two years before the military
campaign was resumed.
There was a lot of rebuilding that had not yet been completed. In
addition, a lot of infrastructure development, particularly in power
generation and the upgrading of the road networks, was necessary to spur
economic growth. The President and the Government did not ignore these
responsibilities. Instead, they skilfully engaged in multi-focal
governance, where the other critical national requirements were met
while the focus on the military campaign was not in any way reduced.
Along with these domestic issues, another key factor underpinning the
success of our operations was the management of international pressure
by the political leadership. In 1987, the enormously successful
Vadamarachchi operations had pushed the LTTE to the brink of defeat.
However, these operations could not be sustained because the Indian
Government intervened.
The primary problem in 1987 was that the relationship between the two
countries had not been managed very effectively. In contrast, from the
time of his election, President Rajapaksa went out of his way to keep
New Delhi briefed about all the new developments taking place in Sri
Lanka.
He understood that while other countries could mount pressure on us
through diplomatic channels or economic means, only India could
influence the military campaign. From very early in the humanitarian
operations, the relationship between Sri Lanka and India was managed
through maintaining a clear communications line at the very highest
level.
A special committee was established to engage in constant dialogue.
The Sri Lankan side comprised then Senior Advisor to the President Basil
Rajapaksa, Secretary to the President Lalith Weeratunga, and myself, as
Defence Secretary. The Indian side comprised former National Security
Advisor M.K. Narayan, then Foreign Secretary Shiv Shankar Menon and then
Defence Secretary Vijay Singh.
This troika had continuous discussions and ensured that whenever any
sensitive issues arose, they would be resolved immediately. The
Government also ensured that our relationships with other important
regional allies and other friendly countries were well maintained
through usual diplomatic channels and regular dialogue. Ultimately this
able management of critical international relations was another key
success factor in the eradication of terrorism. Unfortunately, it has to
be noted that influential figures in a few countries outside the region
were sceptical about the Government’s decision to re-open a military
campaign against the LTTE. There were many reasons for this.
Key reason
A key reason was a fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of
the LTTE and the necessity to eradicate it. I spoke earlier about the
numerous atrocities and human rights violations carried out by the LTTE.
Unfortunately, the LTTE also had a great deal of global influence
through some elements of the Tamil diaspora, which played a significant
role in the electoral politics of certain Western nations.This
influence, combined with the skill of the LTTE propaganda machine, was
strong enough to create a false, competing narrative in which the LTTE
assumed the guise of a liberation army for an oppressed population.
This is far from the truth. While it is true that the LTTE’s first
major attack on an Army convoy in 1983 sparked riots in the South during
which the Tamil community suffered at the hands of violent mobs, Sri
Lanka as a nation grew up very rapidly after that incident and left
those dark days far behind. ?
Continued next week
|