
The essence of love
************
Men speak conveniently of love, when it suits their purpose
The giving of love is an education in itself
- Eleanor Roosevelt
*************
Love: the word connotes different meanings to diverse
personalities. From causing one to appreciate, delight in, and crave the
presence or possession of another; and, to please or promote the welfare
of the other; to sexual passion or the gratification of it; the word
love can have a variety of related but distinct meanings in different
contexts. Often, other languages use multiple words to express some of
the different concepts that English relies mainly on “love” to
encapsulate. In English, love refers to a variety of different feelings,
states, and attitudes, ranging from pleasure to interpersonal
attraction. “Love” may refer specifically to the passionate desire and
intimacy of romantic love; to the sexual love of Eros; to the emotional
closeness of familial love, or the platonic love that defines
friendship; to the profound oneness or devotion of religious love. This
diversity of uses and meanings, combined with the complexity of the
feelings involved, makes love unusually difficult to consistently
define, even compared to other emotional states.
The nature or essence of love is a subject of frequent debate. When
discussed in the abstract, love usually refers to interpersonal love, an
experience felt by a person for another person. Love often involves
caring for or identifying with a person or thing, including oneself. In
addition to cross-cultural differences in understanding love, ideas
about love have also changed greatly over time. Because of the complex
and abstract nature of love, discourse on love is commonly reduced to a
thought-terminating cliché, and there are a number of common proverbs
regarding love, from Virgil’s “Love conquers all” to The Beatles’ “All
You Need Is Love”. Aristotle, defines love as “to will the good of
another.” Bertrand Russell describes love as a condition of “absolute
value,” as opposed to relative value. Philosopher Gottfried Leibniz said
that love is: to be delighted by the happiness of another.
Love in its various forms acts as a major facilitator of
interpersonal relationships and, owing to its central psychological
importance, is one of the most common themes in the creative arts. Love
also is sometimes referred to as being the “international language”,
overriding cultural and linguistic divisions. Whatever it may be, love
seems to have three different components: intimacy, commitment, and
passion. But there are those who say that love is all about attachment,
caring, and intimacy. Whichever way one may interpret it, I find that
many of the male members of the human species in Sri Lanka, and I would
say especially the young, equate love with lust.
Lust is an emotional force that is directly associated with the
thinking or fantasizing about one’s desire, usually in a sexual way.
The link between love and lust has always been a problematic question
in philosophy. Schopenhauer notes the misery which results from sexual
relationships. According to him, this directly explains the sentiments
of shame and sadness which tend to follow the act of sexual intercourse.
For, he states, the only power that reigns is the inextinguishable
desire to face, at any price, the blind love present in human existence
without any consideration of the outcome. He estimates that a genius of
his species is an industrial being who wants only to produce, and wants
only to think.
The theme of lust for Schopenhauer is thus to consider the horrors
which will almost certainly follow the culmination of lust.
In many religious doctrines lust is loosely defined with the result
that it is often equated and confused with the physical expression of
love in the sexual act.
In fact, it is said that lusting is only the ‘thinking’ about sex,
and this thinking about the natural sexual energy gives rise to a
separate powerful emotional condition known as lust.
This emotional condition is the problem in love. There is a famous
quote on the subject of celibacy (with regard to being free of sexual
force) clarifying the definition of love: “You don’t need a celibate
body, you need a celibate mind.”
A celibate mind is a mind free of lust.
The natural attraction between the sexes is pure and holy. The
physical act of sex in the absence of wanting and trying, thinking and
fantasizing (lust), results in the creation of a state of love in the
bodies.
The error in love is to think about sex.
However, one should not confuse lust with lechery. Lust is an
interior, psychological action. Lechery is behaviour, a physical
manifestation or behavioural pattern of an interior condition (lust).
Lust does not necessarily result in the action of lechery. The
dictionary definition confirms that lechery is a behaviour: inordinate
indulgence in sexual activity; unrestrained and promiscuous sexuality;
immoderate indulgence of sexual desire; lewd and lustful behaviour.
If I have dwelt so much on love, lust and lechery; it is because not
many amongst the young know the difference between these actions. Many
tend to confuse one for the other, if one is to go by the behaviour
exhibited.
I think it is mainly due to this bewilderment, when lust is mistaken
to be love, and the error leads on to marriage, that many a newly wed
finds marriage to be a disappointing proposition once the initial
euphoria fades. Scientific research has established that lust rarely
last more than a few weeks or months. Recent studies in neuroscience
have indicated that as people fall in love, the brain consistently
releases a certain set of chemicals, which act in a manner similar to
amphetamines, stimulating the brain’s pleasure centre and leading to
side effects such as increased heart rate, loss of appetite and sleep,
and an intense feeling of excitement. Research has indicated that this
stage generally lasts from one and a half to three years. Since the lust
and attraction stages are both considered temporary, a third stage is
needed to account for long-term relationships.
Attachment is the bonding that promotes relationships lasting for
many years and even decades.
Attachment is generally based on commitments such as marriage and
children, or on mutual friendship based on things like shared
interests.Considering all the above aspects of love, I would say to the
ladies: beware; men speak conveniently of love, when it suits their
purpose. I am sure most ladies will know what that purpose is!
See you this day next week. Until then, keep thinking, keep laughing.
Life is mostly about these two activities.
For views, reviews, encomiums and brick-bats:
[email protected] |