Creating a path of success with a vision
Interviewed by Charith Perera
Montage interviews Lakshman Joseph de Saram, the Artistic Director of
the Chamber Music Society of Colombo, celebrating its 5th anniversary
this year.
Question: It has been five years since the orchestra of the
fledgling Chamber Music Society of Colombo made its debut at Temple
Trees, where do you see the Society now?
Answer: Five years is not a long time, but we have
successfully managed to meet and mostly exceed our internally set
benchmarks, both artistically and fiscally.
Q: How would you qualify the artistic and fiscal success of
the Society?
A:Well, simplistically, if you listen to the recordings of our
concerts six years back and compare them to the ones we made some months
ago, it is clearly obvious that the ensemble now sounds better, it is
more cohesive, more precise, more responsive.
Financially, we have a growing permanent endowment fund audited by
Ernst & Young and headed by the Society’s honorary Chairman, the
prominent philanthropist Mohan Tissanayagam. And from this year, our
annual operating budget is generously taken care of by our Premier
sponsor. Further more, our individual concerts have very little problems
attracting sponsorship from high-end organizations because our
end-product is what it is, the classical repertoire served with the
expected elegance. No gimmicks.
Q: When you say ‘no gimmicks’, what do you mean by that?
A: Classical music does not require too much marketing or
hype, in very much the same way diamonds don’t require too much
convincing of its value, it is assumed that the people interested in
that form of music, classical music, chamber music, understand the
intrinsic value. We have found that you actually run the risk of
alienating your core audience for this kind of music if you try hard to
sell it. So, when I say the CMSC is not gimmicky, what I mean is that we
try to stay true to the rules of the game. You can call it respect too.
Respect for the composers we interpret and respect for the audience we
perform to.
Q: There is a popular trend in Colombo these days of
productions offering gift packs to ticket holders at concerts, is this a
trend you think the CMSC will follow?
A:No.
Q: Why not?
 |
Lakshman Joseph de
Saram |
A: Fortunately, that sort of generosity has still not found
its way to the formal classical concert. I think it’s mostly seen at the
semi-classical pop type show, where they might even throw in a barbecue
if you are lucky. I’m not knocking it, I live for that sort of thing,
but it could be construed as somewhat tacky if we were to do it.
Q: Your answer could be interpreted as slightly patronising,
what makes the CMSC giving gift packs at a concert tacky, and others
not?
A: No condescension meant, perhaps I should have not used the
word tacky, inappropriate would be better. It would be inappropriate for
the CMSC to hand out gift bags of soap or whatever they put in there, to
our typical audience members. And it’s not just limited to us, any
classical music production worth its salt won’t do it. As I said before,
these are some of the rules of the game. No change necessary.
Q: What would you attribute as the primary source for the
Society’s artistic rise over the last five years?
A: There are many attributes, but mostly, it has been our
focus, our mission and vision. The singular need to self check and
improve. These initial years have been where we have constantly tweaked
‘our’ sound, so to speak. It’s a never ending process.
Also, we collectively help the Chamber Music Society aspire to be
bigger than us, the individuals involved in running it.
Although I may have founded it, and drive it with a specific vision
in mind, I can’t think of anything more satisfying than to bring the
CMSC up to a point where I become totally dispensable. That would be a
very healthy position to be in. Also, a huge attribute to the Society’s
strength are its musicians, naturally.
Q: Does the Chamber Society have a democratic system in place
where the musicians can take turns in conducting or directing the
orchestra for instance?
A: I’m not sure what systems you refer to, but we take our
cues from simple orchestral norms that are accepted globally, where
among other things, you will not normally find random musicians of the
orchestra volunteering to conduct or direct.
In the same way you will not find employees of a listed company
taking turns in being CEO.
It’s hard to be taken seriously if things like that happen under your
watch, but that’s only if you care. This has nothing to do with being
democratic or otherwise, common sense is more like it. Plus the
professional musicians of the Society will not tolerate it. It’s too
confusing.
Q: You seem to be dismissive against having musicians taking
turns in directing, other than the internationally accepted norms you
mention.What specific musical reason do you have for denying musicians
of the orchestra the opportunity to direct?
A: Once more, these are not reasonings I came about in a moment of
enlightenment, I am only applying systems and common sense, these have
proven track records internationally that govern professional
orchestras. More specifically, in a professionally run orchestra, all
musicians are specialists, you don’t enjoy the versatility that amateur
groups have. The same applies to the conductor or artistic director
position, it does not help the organization to have a never ending
merry-go-round system of heads.
Every five years, yes, that’s a very real possibility.
What I think is bringing about this confusion about democracy in the
orchestra, is we are mixing the two rather glaring differences between
amateur and pro, if the original mandate of the CMSC was amateur
inspired, where we essentially get together to make music for the fun of
it, then it does not matter if I am a amateur tambourine player one day
and a harpsichordist the next, we are ethically not responsible for what
the concert is going to sound like to a paying audience, we do it
because we love it, and you are invited to the party, but please don’t
hold us accountable for any surprises, anything goes, it works
beautifully for everyone.
But that’s not how the CMSC was incorporated, we are playing the
long-game, and the basic framework towards a full-fledged professional
orchestra was laid out at the on-set, and we would like to keep close to
that as much as possible.
Q: What is the typical Chamber Music Society rehearsal like?
Are the rehearsal techniques different between the classical groups in
Sri Lanka?
A: I don’t know if there are differences per se, but usually,
if it’s a classical program being rehearsed by an orchestra, the basics
are similar.
Our rehearsals, when we don’t employ a full fledged conductor, are
more inclusive, much more attentive and collaborative, and for that to
work, the musicians need to like each other, firstly, and be musically
on the same page, ideally. We are lucky to have those traits working for
us.
Q: Programming a concert, how important is that?
A: Hugely important. Your classical concert program is the
equivalent of a menu of a fine dining restaurant. Thought and
practicality have to go into the planning, plenty of variables to deal
with.
This is all before you even get to the interpretive potion of it.
It’s all pretty hit or miss, truly.
Q: What rules do you employ when programming a typical CMSC
concert?
A: Firstly, and quite boringly, I am practical. I look at the
personnel we have and plan accordingly, if the CMSC had 104 players, I
doubt we would be playing mid-period Haydn. It’s that simple.
It’s all about acoustic ratios, using the right number for the music
and the space it will be performed in. After I short-list some
appropriate repertoire, I consult the principal players on possible
combinations, and then we have an exploratory rehearsal with the rest of
the players and decide if it’s a go. It’s a simple process.
Q: What if certain players would like to perform pieces you
have not chosen, does the CMSC allow room for discussion on the
programming level?
A: Interesting question, and at the risk of sounding
absolutist, the answer in no.
We do not have a stage in the concert programming process where such
requests can be made, it could change, but as we speak, programing
decisions and made by the artistic director and the soloists involved.
Of course, there is plenty of informal discussion on appropriate
repertoire amongst us, and many of those ideas are incorporated in the
final lists.
But what is important to note, the programmatic decisions are made
solely based on how best the CMSC will sound in a live concert setting,
full stop.
Not because of some selfish need to play the music we like. If that
were the case, it would be Bruckner, Sibelius and Shostakovich mainly.
Q: The frequency of CMSC concerts are limited, why is that?
A: There are several reasons, mostly, we feel that three
concerts spread over the year featuring the main orchestra with soloist
and conductor is sufficient for Colombo’s tier-one classical music
population at this point.
More concerts, and you could run the risk of thinning anticipation,
and anticipation is a potent ingredient in enhancing your concert
experience. You don’t want predictability creeping in.
We will obviously increase the frequency when more people show
interest in attending, the good news is that the numbers are indeed
rising. Also, there is scope for the smaller more intimate
recital/concert, and we now perform six of those concerts at the
Goethe-Institute over the year. So our season actually contains nine
distinct programs, not counting the private soirées.
Q: The CMSC has many affiliations to prominent Embassies and
cultural institutions, how important are these relationships to a
cultural organisation?
A: Very important, especially working with institutions and
Embassies that understand the time-tested value of supporting culture
and all the nurturing aspects aligned with that. We are fortunate to
have the support.
Q: It would seem that the CMSC does not have an obvious
commercial angle to its sponsorship tie-ups, is there a reason behind
this?
A: Not really, our sponsorship and funding approach is
discreet, exclusive and un-aggressive. We are very lucky to have
like-minded people and organisations believe in that as well.
Like I said before, the people who support us, take for instance our
first public concert sponsored by a company, they did it because they
primarily love art and culture and this country, not because they felt
the need to use a classical concert to push their product on you. There
is a time and place for everything. Mercifully, we don’t attract the
mercenary in-your-face commercial attitudes.
Q: If you don’t mind us asking, based on the reputation of the
CMSC being one of the more financially stable arts organisations in the
country, even rivaling those supported by the Government, how is the
CMSC funded?
A: I don’t know if we are the most financially stable
anything, the question is best answered by Mohan Tissanayagam, or our
Treasurer Rajeev Aloysius, but in a nutshell, we have an annual
operating budget and a permanent endowment fund. This month, we are
thrilled to be signing an all-important multi-year premier
sponsorship/funding package with a company.
This very generous financial gesture will give the Chamber Music
Society total financial independence by eliminating our annual operating
budget, thus enabling us to concentrate on investing in and enhancing
our end-product, taking it to the next level of professionalism.
This is a major milestone. Our permanent endowment is funded
primarily through the significant contributions to the elite ‘Chairman’s
Circle’ of the Society. We are grateful for the long term financial
commitment shown to us by leading commercial establishments.
Q: Do you see the CMSC supporting other less fortunate arts
organisation in the future?
A: We are still in the midst of solidifying our foundations,
when we do eventually get to a point where our funds are rock solid, I
can see the Society increase its outreach program significantly.
Q: What can we expect from the CMSC in the coming months?
A: Great music! All information can be found on our website,
colombochambermusic.org and on Facebook. |