Food technology, a bane to health
By Amal Hewavissenti
Modern technology despite being an asset to man it adversely affects
his health. Genetic engineering was introduced to boost productivity
because limited land and crops are inadequate to provide food for the
soaring population.
In this regard, genetic engineering is applied not to increase the
stocks of crops but to produce the maximum to cater to the food needs, a
challenging task.
Unfortunately this process involves increasing the 'bulk of
production' rather than increasing the amount of crops or turning barren
lands into arable land. Experts on genetic engineering have focussed on
increasing the bulk of a chicken, for instance, to produce more meat and
eggs rather than increasing the population of chicken. Here, the same
principles are observed even in food production from animal sources.
We know that artificially promoted and deformed genes are infused
into the animal to upgrade the bulk and taste of the particular animal
product. Obviously, the animals, thus treated artificially and deformed
genetically grow up in complete contrast to their natural brothers that
may appear less productive and smaller. We know that fruits and
vegetables that are the direct products of genetic engineering develop a
surprising resistance to extreme weather conditions such as strong
sunlight. This definitely sounds unusual and unnatural.
These fruits and vegetables never seem to wither, lose colour or rot,
even though they are stored in markets for a long time.
We are frequently attracted to brightly coloured, jumbo sized, fresh
looking fruits or lush green, farm fresh vegetables, kept on display in
the market. People are tempted to buy these "beautiful' products and
become physically dependent on them only to open their bodies to varied
disorders.
However, researches and experiments carried out to probe the quality
and value of these foods have given out negative conclusions. Research
reveals that these foods could pose a health hazard in the long run. The
irresistibly appealing taste, appearance and shape of these foods are
adequate to attract anyone's eye and tongue. Genetically modified fruits
and vegetables strangely maintain an unnaturally fresh colour, taste,
tone and size.
The sellers and importers of GM foods prefer them over the local
fruits and vegetables considering the huge profits they could make from
these attractive products. Though consumers may have their doubts about
the quality and the nutritional value of GM foods, their appealing
appearance blinds the consumers to any possible adverse effects that
these foods may produce. On the other hand, sellers and much less
concerned about the nutritional needs of the people or the qualitative
value of the imported foods. It has now become merely a matter of
competition among commercially rival parties to grab the highest profit.
Thus it is noticeable that the" freshness" of GM Fruits and
vegetables does not at all guarantee a high level of nutritive value
assumed to be latent in them. Yet the effect of these foods has not yet
been identified as totally harmless or totally harmful. Yet certain
tests on them have revealed the presence of chemicals which may cause
serious illnesses in the human body.
Genetically produced foods have a noticeable tolerance to the damage
caused by fungi and pest attacks at the same time, genetically modified
crops and proved to be pesticide-tolerant and herbicide - tolerant. For
instance, a special variety of tomatoes was introduced by USA where the
plant had the capacity to delay the ripening of its fruit. This is
exactly the inherent nature of genetically treated crops.
A feasible solution to global hunger falls beyond the boundaries of
reality. The world's superpowers are still holding the monopoly of
genetic engineering technology and seeds. People buy GM foods and
products mainly because of their wide availability.
The masterminds behind the GM foods are introducing their products to
the world and at the sametime conducting experiments as to the possible
health risks the food may pose on the people.
They employ people from third world countries to gauge the risks or
any potential danger of their products just as scientists use mice to
test harmful substances.
Developed countries unscrupulously destroy their excess food stocks
or use them as animal food without making such excess foods available to
people who die daily due to lack of food. According to the World Health
Organisation, over 172 million children under 10 years of age throughout
the world are not taking even the minimum level of calories needed per
day. They are unable to fulfil their food needs chiefly because of
economic barriers against the background of malnutrition and hunger.
The developed countries tactfully cover-up this situation and project
the idea that a sever food scarcity is around the corner and that GM
foods are the best solution to this global predicament. The chief GM
crops widely cultivated are maize, soya, cotton and canola.
However, any possibility of GM foods and animals having a
catastrophic effect on people must be closely studied. Soya flour,
textured vegetable protein, Soya sause, Soya milk, corn flour, tomatoes,
maize flour, potatoes, potatoe products, beet sugar and yeast are some
of the main GM foods available in the market today.
How far do these foods affect our health is also a major issue and
these foods are high in taste but poor in nutritional value.
World health experts warn that people who consumes GM foods over a
long period will develop allergenic tendencies and toxicity.
It is generally accepted that genetically produced crops are a major
threat to the health and to the ecological balance.
In 2005, a Russian doctor named Irina Ermakova made a spectacular
revelation. She conducted an experiment in which 45 mice were given
genetically modified Soya. Twenty five died after consuming it. The
final question is whether we are ready to make our choices regarding the
intake of food. |