'Bodyline bowling' should be wiped out
BODYLINE BOWLING: Bodyline bowling, also known as fast leg theory
bowling, was a cricketing tactic devised by the English cricket team for
their 1932-33 Ashes tour of Australia, specially to combat the
extraordinary batting skill of Australia's Don Bradman.
A bodyline delivery was one where the cricket ball was bowled towards
the body of the batsman on the line of the leg stump, in the hope of
creating legside deflections that could be caught by one of several
fielders in the quadrant of the field behind square leg.
This was considered by many to be intimidatory and physically
threatening, to the point of being unfair in a game once supposed to
have gentlemanly traditions, but commercialisation of the game had
subsequently tended to elevate the principle of "win at all costs" above
traditional ideals of sportsmanship.
Although no serious injuries arose from any short-pitched deliveries
while a leg theory field was set, the tactic still led to considerable
ill feeling between the two teams, with the controversy eventually
spilling into the diplomatic arena. It so happened in the two decades
that followed, several of the laws of cricket were changed to prevent
this tactic being repeated.
The occasional short-pitched ball aimed at the batsman (a bouncer)has
never been illegal and is still in widespread use as a tactic.
Don Bradman in forefront
The Australian cricket team toured England in 1930. Australia won the
five-Test series 2-1, with Don Bradman scoring 974 runs at a batting
average of 139.14, an aggregate record that still stood. By the time the
following Ashes series of 1932-3 came by, Bradman's average hovered
around 100, approximately twice that of all other world-class batsmen.
England feared that without resorting to drastic tactics, they might
not be able to defeat Australia until Bradman - then aged 24 retired,
something that might be over a decade away. It was believed that
something new was required to combat Bradman, but it was believed more
likely that Bradman could be dismissed by leg-spin as Walter Robins and
Ian Peebles had supposedly caused him problems; two leg-spinners were
included in the English touring party of 1932-33.
Bodyline originated in Oval Test of 1930
The idea of vicious bodyline tactics started in 1930 Ashes series.
When Bradman was batting, the wicket became briefly difficult following
rain. But the capable batsman that Bradman was, he managed to score 232
there was no easy way out of the Englishmen getting him out early.
Then the question arose as to how the Englishmen were going to keep
Bradman quite. When Jardine was appointed England's captain for the
1932-33 English tour of Australia, a meeting was arranged with
Nottinghamshire captain Arthur Carr and his two fast bowlers Harold
Larwood and Bill Voce at London's Piccadilly Hotel to discuss a plan to
combat Bradman's extraordinary skills.
Jardin asked Larwood and Voce if they could bowl on leg stump and
make the ball come up into the body of the batsman. The bowlers agreed
they could, and that it might prove effective. Several meetings were
held in the attempt to keep Bradman quiet. A suggestion was made to
introduce leg-theory bowling.
There was plenty of opposition to the "bodyline" bowling issue and
the MCC introduced a new rule to the laws of cricket for the 1935
English cricket season. Originally, the MCC hoped that captains would
ensure that the game was played in the correct spirit, and passed a
resolution that bodyline would breach this spirit.
Direct attack bowling unfair
When this proved to be insufficient, the MCC passed a law that
"direct attack" bowling was unfair and it became the responsibility of
the umpires to identify and stop.
In 1957, the laws were altered to prevent more than two fielders
standing behind square on the leg side; the intention was to prevent
negative bowling tactics whereby off-spinners and slow in swing bowlers
aimed at the leg stump of batsmen with fielders concentrated on the leg
side.
However, an indirect effect was to make bodyline fields impossible to
implement.
Later law changes, under the heading of "Intimidatory Short Pitched
Bowling", also restricted the number of "bouncers" which may be bowled
in an over. Nevertheless, the tactic of intimidating the batsman is
still used to an extent that would have been shocking in 1933, although
it is less dangerous now because today's players wear helmets and
generally fare more protective gear.
The West Indies teams of the 1980s, which regularly fielded a bowling
attack comprising some of the best fast bowlers in cricket history, were
perhaps the most feared exponents.
ACdeS
|